Hi Correctfact! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC) |
A person does not have to be the biological parent of a child to be a parent. If there's a kid living in the house with her and Alex, then she has a kid, period — we will not disappear the fact from her article just because she didn't personally give birth to the child. And if you dispute the fact again, the article is going to be locked so that you can't edit it at all. Bearcat ( talk) 14:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Please show me a tertiary reference for where she is the parent of the child? The child has two equally involved parents. End of story. If Zoie and her partner were married then she would have a step son, not being married doesn't make you the parent? I missed all the anger in the messages... so here it is. Base your anger on facts. I find it more outrageous you discredit his actual parents of which he has two. Zoie might be a great role model or step mother figure but the fact is she is not his adoptive mother, his step mother, actual mother etc. So if you can find a label that actually fits then use that.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zoie Palmer. AussieLegend ( ✉) 11:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 12:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 12:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 12:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Zoie Palmer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AussieLegend ( ✉) 12:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 13:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
NeilN
talk to me
14:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Hi Correctfact! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC) |
A person does not have to be the biological parent of a child to be a parent. If there's a kid living in the house with her and Alex, then she has a kid, period — we will not disappear the fact from her article just because she didn't personally give birth to the child. And if you dispute the fact again, the article is going to be locked so that you can't edit it at all. Bearcat ( talk) 14:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Please show me a tertiary reference for where she is the parent of the child? The child has two equally involved parents. End of story. If Zoie and her partner were married then she would have a step son, not being married doesn't make you the parent? I missed all the anger in the messages... so here it is. Base your anger on facts. I find it more outrageous you discredit his actual parents of which he has two. Zoie might be a great role model or step mother figure but the fact is she is not his adoptive mother, his step mother, actual mother etc. So if you can find a label that actually fits then use that.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zoie Palmer. AussieLegend ( ✉) 11:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 12:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 12:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 12:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Zoie Palmer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AussieLegend ( ✉) 12:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 13:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
NeilN
talk to me
14:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)