Hello, I'm
ItsCheck. An edit that you recently made to
Bryan Cranston seemed to be a test and has been
reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use
your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
ItsCheck (
talk)
23:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Burial (musician), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Waxworker (
talk)
04:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bryan Cranston, you may be blocked from editing. Date of birth isn't extremely important for a short description. ItsCheck ( talk) 02:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Culture of England, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Articles that are "sufficiently detailed that an additional short description would not be helpful" do not need shortdescs repeating them in equivalent words, per
WP:SDNONE.
Belbury (
talk)
14:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Revirvlkodlaku (
talk)
14:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Ne-Yo, you may be
blocked from editing. Again, we don't need to add things like birthplace in short descriptions unless there's really a reasonable likelihood the article might be confused with someone else with the same name and occupation. Please heed these warnings.
ZimZalaBim
talk
13:54, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
As has been noted in the warnings above, you seem to be adding lengthy, trivial, and often unnecessary details to short descriptions (ie, [1]. Please stop, and instead use the article's talk page if you want to build consensus for these changes that seem to go contrary to guidelines. -- ZimZalaBim talk 14:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Read WP:SDLENGTH please -- FMSky ( talk) 16:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Please note there is a conversation at the Administrators Noticeboard Incidents that you are involved in. Here is a direct link. Canterbury Tail talk 14:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Since you seem to be ignoring all the warnings above, and you're outright refusing to participate in the ANI thread about your actions, I'm giving you a final warning. If you continue to make disruptive edits to the Short Descriptions against WP:SHORTDESC, or continue to make disruptive and incorrect edits to it as you have been doing, you will be blocked from editing. You don't appear to understand the purpose of the short description field nor are you paying enough attention to the articles to continuously write even accurate short descriptions. Canterbury Tail talk 01:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Cornucopiaa ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have read the short description page fully and understand that short description field should remain below 60 characters
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. UtherSRG (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
OK. Do you understand why? Can you say that for us in your own words? Daniel Case ( talk) 04:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ItsCheck. An edit that you recently made to
Bryan Cranston seemed to be a test and has been
reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use
your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
ItsCheck (
talk)
23:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Burial (musician), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Waxworker (
talk)
04:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bryan Cranston, you may be blocked from editing. Date of birth isn't extremely important for a short description. ItsCheck ( talk) 02:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Culture of England, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Articles that are "sufficiently detailed that an additional short description would not be helpful" do not need shortdescs repeating them in equivalent words, per
WP:SDNONE.
Belbury (
talk)
14:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Revirvlkodlaku (
talk)
14:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Ne-Yo, you may be
blocked from editing. Again, we don't need to add things like birthplace in short descriptions unless there's really a reasonable likelihood the article might be confused with someone else with the same name and occupation. Please heed these warnings.
ZimZalaBim
talk
13:54, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
As has been noted in the warnings above, you seem to be adding lengthy, trivial, and often unnecessary details to short descriptions (ie, [1]. Please stop, and instead use the article's talk page if you want to build consensus for these changes that seem to go contrary to guidelines. -- ZimZalaBim talk 14:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Read WP:SDLENGTH please -- FMSky ( talk) 16:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Please note there is a conversation at the Administrators Noticeboard Incidents that you are involved in. Here is a direct link. Canterbury Tail talk 14:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Since you seem to be ignoring all the warnings above, and you're outright refusing to participate in the ANI thread about your actions, I'm giving you a final warning. If you continue to make disruptive edits to the Short Descriptions against WP:SHORTDESC, or continue to make disruptive and incorrect edits to it as you have been doing, you will be blocked from editing. You don't appear to understand the purpose of the short description field nor are you paying enough attention to the articles to continuously write even accurate short descriptions. Canterbury Tail talk 01:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Cornucopiaa ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have read the short description page fully and understand that short description field should remain below 60 characters
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. UtherSRG (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
OK. Do you understand why? Can you say that for us in your own words? Daniel Case ( talk) 04:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)