Good start on improving this article! Here are some suggestions:
Keep up the good work! Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 15:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
I encourage you to totally overhaul this article! HopsonRoad ( talk) 15:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi CornishFourColumns,
Congratulations on the progress that you are making in improving this article!
Two phrases caught my eye in light of MOS:FLOWERY:
MOS:SURNAME says that, "After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only....", so we should be talking about "Fuller", instead of "Lucia".
I hope that these suggestions are helpful. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 22:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi C4C, you might want to review MOS:NEE on how to handle the change of names from birth into marriage in the lead sentence. The fact that she is mentioned in the article before and after marriage indicates, per MOS:SURNAME, that you should avoid calling her "Lucia", but instead refer to her as "Fairchild" prior to marriage and "Fuller" thereafter. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 16:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
CornishFourColumns Thanks for the ping regarding the Lucia Fairchild Fuller. My interest in her is her participation in the Chicago World's Fair. Happy to see you have kept that. I am writing you back to mention that there is a segment of editors who do not condone rewriting an article in user sandbox and then moving it. Please see the discussion at Women in Red archives under "Incoming batch of biographies from Wiki Education". It is great that you are working on updating women artists! I don't want you to be alarmed if you get some negative feed back for this technique. You are adding cited material. Go ahead and work in the main space! Best. WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 18:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC) PS Think about becoming involved in Women in Red...We are an active community with a variety of ongoing events.
I was wondering what you think of having the images run down the right side of the article so that they can be enjoyed as one read's the article.
I hope I wasn't too heavy handed with copy edits. Feel free to revert something if you don't agree. Other than some copy edits, I moved side comments into a "Notes" section, removed people in "See also" that are already linked in the article, moved the remaining See also up to the Early life and education and added to the intro.
When you are ready, I think the article is ready to copy to the article. The comment for the paste into the article should provide a link to your sandbox.
Great job!– CaroleHenson ( talk) 06:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Subsequent to the participation of a third editor, who made substantive contributions to the draft article in this sandbox, the material was moved in its entirety to Lucia Fairchild Fuller with this edit. The above two sections in this talk page were copied to Talk:Lucia Fairchild Fuller with this edit. HopsonRoad ( talk) 02:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Good start on improving this article! Here are some suggestions:
Keep up the good work! Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 15:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
I encourage you to totally overhaul this article! HopsonRoad ( talk) 15:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi CornishFourColumns,
Congratulations on the progress that you are making in improving this article!
Two phrases caught my eye in light of MOS:FLOWERY:
MOS:SURNAME says that, "After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only....", so we should be talking about "Fuller", instead of "Lucia".
I hope that these suggestions are helpful. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 22:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi C4C, you might want to review MOS:NEE on how to handle the change of names from birth into marriage in the lead sentence. The fact that she is mentioned in the article before and after marriage indicates, per MOS:SURNAME, that you should avoid calling her "Lucia", but instead refer to her as "Fairchild" prior to marriage and "Fuller" thereafter. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 16:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
CornishFourColumns Thanks for the ping regarding the Lucia Fairchild Fuller. My interest in her is her participation in the Chicago World's Fair. Happy to see you have kept that. I am writing you back to mention that there is a segment of editors who do not condone rewriting an article in user sandbox and then moving it. Please see the discussion at Women in Red archives under "Incoming batch of biographies from Wiki Education". It is great that you are working on updating women artists! I don't want you to be alarmed if you get some negative feed back for this technique. You are adding cited material. Go ahead and work in the main space! Best. WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 18:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC) PS Think about becoming involved in Women in Red...We are an active community with a variety of ongoing events.
I was wondering what you think of having the images run down the right side of the article so that they can be enjoyed as one read's the article.
I hope I wasn't too heavy handed with copy edits. Feel free to revert something if you don't agree. Other than some copy edits, I moved side comments into a "Notes" section, removed people in "See also" that are already linked in the article, moved the remaining See also up to the Early life and education and added to the intro.
When you are ready, I think the article is ready to copy to the article. The comment for the paste into the article should provide a link to your sandbox.
Great job!– CaroleHenson ( talk) 06:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Subsequent to the participation of a third editor, who made substantive contributions to the draft article in this sandbox, the material was moved in its entirety to Lucia Fairchild Fuller with this edit. The above two sections in this talk page were copied to Talk:Lucia Fairchild Fuller with this edit. HopsonRoad ( talk) 02:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)