Happy to see another Corkman editing. I presume your from Coachford? I'm from Macroom myself. Ceoil ( talk) 01:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, yep I'm from around the Coachford area myself. Corkonian2013 ( talk) 22:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, would you like an up to date picture of Saint Olans Rectory? I'm not an editor but could send you a file via e-mail.
I might be passing Coachford next weekend, will I try and get a replacement photograph? Ceoil ( talk) 14:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
That would be great Ceoil. This is a private property, so a distant road-shot as opposed to that quality close-up would be the only option. I did explain when uploading that the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage (whose image that is) are happy for their images to be used for educational purposes (as confirmed on their website) but that doesn't seem to have worked here. Corkonian2013 ( talk) 22:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
It should be possible to get an image of the house (and its nice surrounds/demesne too) with a camera lens from the road to the south .... from about this spot ... http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,544040,575247,6,10 The (un)funny thing is that road wasn't there when the house was built (or when the ornamental tower on the other side of the road now across the field was built. That's one of those famine relief roads/works of 1846/1847.
It gets better. That road was sanctioned at Coachford Courthouse Petty Sessions in late 1846, but its location was disputed by the famine relief committees of Aghabullogue & Magourney. Both areas were (are still are) in the catholic parish of Aghabullogue, but in the Civil administrative parishes of Aghabullogue & Magourney. The road travels along the border of both civil parishes, through a bog. I dread to think of the conditions of those who actually built it amidst local political meanderings.
Alternate image up re Aghavrin House, copyright free. I'll upload a better one later on. Corkonian2013 ( talk) 16:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Aghavrin House.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
The image has been replaced in an article by an image which I took myself. Therefore I am happy for image File:Aghavrin House.jpg to be deleted with immediate effect if desired Corkonian2013 ( talk) 22:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mullinhassig Wood & Waterfalls, Aghavrin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Fixed now. Corkonian2013 ( talk) 09:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luskin's Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mallow ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, if you create any more can you add them to this list. Trying to create as comprehensive a list as possible, your help is needed! Keep up the good work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Corkonian2013. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Corkonian2013. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clonmoyle House West until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Boleyn ( talk) 21:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
The article Clontead House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable private house. Appears on some maps. But is not subject to any protection or any survey by any heritage body in Ireland. For example, it does not appear in the RMP (Records of Monments and Places) for County Cork. Nor has it been listed in the RPS (Record of Protected Structures by Cork County Council]. Nor has it been surveyed by the NIAH (National Inventory of Architectural Heritage) for even potential inclusion in any registry. Subject hence fails WP:NBUILDING as well as WP:SIGCOV (the only source we have to support the text are maps. And directory listings. And they barely support the text. And do not support notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Guliolopez (
talk)
20:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
The article Larchfield House, Carrignamuck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable private house. Fails WP:NBUILDING (not a protected structure) and WP:GNG (no coverage of any description beyond the ROTM entry in the NIAH database). And, even at that, the NIAH entry doesn't give the building a name.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Guliolopez (
talk)
14:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aghavrin Cottage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Guliolopez ( talk) 16:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
The article Aghabullogue Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable (early 20th century) single-span bridge that isn't a protected structure, has not been the subject of any coverage or survey, and doesn't meet WP:NBUILDING or WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Guliolopez (
talk)
09:58, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Happy to see another Corkman editing. I presume your from Coachford? I'm from Macroom myself. Ceoil ( talk) 01:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, yep I'm from around the Coachford area myself. Corkonian2013 ( talk) 22:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, would you like an up to date picture of Saint Olans Rectory? I'm not an editor but could send you a file via e-mail.
I might be passing Coachford next weekend, will I try and get a replacement photograph? Ceoil ( talk) 14:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
That would be great Ceoil. This is a private property, so a distant road-shot as opposed to that quality close-up would be the only option. I did explain when uploading that the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage (whose image that is) are happy for their images to be used for educational purposes (as confirmed on their website) but that doesn't seem to have worked here. Corkonian2013 ( talk) 22:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
It should be possible to get an image of the house (and its nice surrounds/demesne too) with a camera lens from the road to the south .... from about this spot ... http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,544040,575247,6,10 The (un)funny thing is that road wasn't there when the house was built (or when the ornamental tower on the other side of the road now across the field was built. That's one of those famine relief roads/works of 1846/1847.
It gets better. That road was sanctioned at Coachford Courthouse Petty Sessions in late 1846, but its location was disputed by the famine relief committees of Aghabullogue & Magourney. Both areas were (are still are) in the catholic parish of Aghabullogue, but in the Civil administrative parishes of Aghabullogue & Magourney. The road travels along the border of both civil parishes, through a bog. I dread to think of the conditions of those who actually built it amidst local political meanderings.
Alternate image up re Aghavrin House, copyright free. I'll upload a better one later on. Corkonian2013 ( talk) 16:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Aghavrin House.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
The image has been replaced in an article by an image which I took myself. Therefore I am happy for image File:Aghavrin House.jpg to be deleted with immediate effect if desired Corkonian2013 ( talk) 22:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mullinhassig Wood & Waterfalls, Aghavrin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Fixed now. Corkonian2013 ( talk) 09:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luskin's Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mallow ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, if you create any more can you add them to this list. Trying to create as comprehensive a list as possible, your help is needed! Keep up the good work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Corkonian2013. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Corkonian2013. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clonmoyle House West until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Boleyn ( talk) 21:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
The article Clontead House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable private house. Appears on some maps. But is not subject to any protection or any survey by any heritage body in Ireland. For example, it does not appear in the RMP (Records of Monments and Places) for County Cork. Nor has it been listed in the RPS (Record of Protected Structures by Cork County Council]. Nor has it been surveyed by the NIAH (National Inventory of Architectural Heritage) for even potential inclusion in any registry. Subject hence fails WP:NBUILDING as well as WP:SIGCOV (the only source we have to support the text are maps. And directory listings. And they barely support the text. And do not support notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Guliolopez (
talk)
20:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
The article Larchfield House, Carrignamuck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable private house. Fails WP:NBUILDING (not a protected structure) and WP:GNG (no coverage of any description beyond the ROTM entry in the NIAH database). And, even at that, the NIAH entry doesn't give the building a name.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Guliolopez (
talk)
14:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aghavrin Cottage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Guliolopez ( talk) 16:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
The article Aghabullogue Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable (early 20th century) single-span bridge that isn't a protected structure, has not been the subject of any coverage or survey, and doesn't meet WP:NBUILDING or WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Guliolopez (
talk)
09:58, 7 September 2023 (UTC)