Home | Talk | Contributions | Projects |
I'm trying not to edit the Exetel talk page or the Exetel article for a while because of the edit wars but I wanted to comment on some of the things you said.
Essentially there's a lot of merit in what you've suggested and I've taken it on board. I've completely revised the Exetel article correcting links, rewriting text etc and I've incorporated a lot of what you've suggested. You can see my proposal at User:AussieLegend/Exetel/Article. (Ignore the header icons etc. They only exist on my user pages.)
The following are some specific comments.
"The entire "Residential Services" and "Small/Large Business" seem superfluous and I would have thought that the quality of the article would be improved by removing them."
"Corporate Employee ADSL Service includes mention of "lower cost" which may border on advertising / promotion of Exetel"
"Online Gaming Services seems to devote too large of a contribution."
"Traffic shaping 50% of P2P traffic and 40->48Gb offpeak limit seem to be separate policies and could be separated"
"In fact, "off-peak" download limits don't seem to be an "atypical policy of Australian ISPs" at all and could be removed"
"The atypical policy relating to off-peak is the unique shaping protocols in place (i.e. 48Gb to 72Gb = restricted pool, 72Gb and over - charged). So this may require a new subheading under Policies"
"Items 4, 5 and 6 (dealing with Traffic Shaping) to be replaced with the original and official Exetel source of
http://forum.exetel.com.au/viewtopic.php?t=17721. 2 of the 3 cited sources in question each reference the official Exetel source anyway, so why not replace with the original?"
"Removal of items 10, 11 and 13 as they cite blogs"
"In fact, complete removal of the sentence linking to these footnotes: "In June 2007, this policy was reported on after a post was made on Boing Boing.[10] [11] [12] [13]"
"Item 12 is entered as a footnote to "Boing Boing" and should be relocated to be next to [9]"
I've incoprporated the changes from my (our) proposed version into the main Exetel article. Cheers. -- AussieLegend 10:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Home | Talk | Contributions | Projects |
I'm trying not to edit the Exetel talk page or the Exetel article for a while because of the edit wars but I wanted to comment on some of the things you said.
Essentially there's a lot of merit in what you've suggested and I've taken it on board. I've completely revised the Exetel article correcting links, rewriting text etc and I've incorporated a lot of what you've suggested. You can see my proposal at User:AussieLegend/Exetel/Article. (Ignore the header icons etc. They only exist on my user pages.)
The following are some specific comments.
"The entire "Residential Services" and "Small/Large Business" seem superfluous and I would have thought that the quality of the article would be improved by removing them."
"Corporate Employee ADSL Service includes mention of "lower cost" which may border on advertising / promotion of Exetel"
"Online Gaming Services seems to devote too large of a contribution."
"Traffic shaping 50% of P2P traffic and 40->48Gb offpeak limit seem to be separate policies and could be separated"
"In fact, "off-peak" download limits don't seem to be an "atypical policy of Australian ISPs" at all and could be removed"
"The atypical policy relating to off-peak is the unique shaping protocols in place (i.e. 48Gb to 72Gb = restricted pool, 72Gb and over - charged). So this may require a new subheading under Policies"
"Items 4, 5 and 6 (dealing with Traffic Shaping) to be replaced with the original and official Exetel source of
http://forum.exetel.com.au/viewtopic.php?t=17721. 2 of the 3 cited sources in question each reference the official Exetel source anyway, so why not replace with the original?"
"Removal of items 10, 11 and 13 as they cite blogs"
"In fact, complete removal of the sentence linking to these footnotes: "In June 2007, this policy was reported on after a post was made on Boing Boing.[10] [11] [12] [13]"
"Item 12 is entered as a footnote to "Boing Boing" and should be relocated to be next to [9]"
I've incoprporated the changes from my (our) proposed version into the main Exetel article. Cheers. -- AussieLegend 10:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)