Welcome!
Hello, Contestcen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —
arf!
06:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
A "{{
prod}}" template has been added to the article
Word Rebus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached.
Fram
08:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
{{ helpme}} The articles that I have written or edited contain many math expressions and equations. When the article is displayed, these expressions often get split in the middle li
ke this. It makes them hard to read. I have tried using the HTML tag nobr but that just causes the tag to be displayed.
Contescen, your repeated edits and reverts based on belief rather than verifiable sources are becoming increasingly annoying. Please, note that wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Original research, such as the new definition of the Three-pass protocol are not welcome. Rather you should reflect what is already published (see WP:OR). Cryptography is not as easy as one might think first. In particular, you should refer to source if you want to claim an attack against a cryptosystem (such as you did with Massey-Omura cryptosystem) or if you want to claim that a scheme is secure against a certain type of attack (e.g. you claim that certain three-pass protocols are secure against certain attacks). In fact, your claims can shown to be incorrect. Please stop removing requests for citations, just because you might think that certain facts are true. There are quite a few editors on wikipedia having a PhD, working on one or having similar education and could help out. But remember that finding appropriate citations can take some time. Finally, note that removing contested edits and marking such reverts as minor edits is considered to be rude. Thanks. 85.2.48.141 ( talk) 08:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Word Rebus, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word Rebus. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Muchness ( talk) 21:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Contestcen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —
arf!
06:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
A "{{
prod}}" template has been added to the article
Word Rebus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached.
Fram
08:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
{{ helpme}} The articles that I have written or edited contain many math expressions and equations. When the article is displayed, these expressions often get split in the middle li
ke this. It makes them hard to read. I have tried using the HTML tag nobr but that just causes the tag to be displayed.
Contescen, your repeated edits and reverts based on belief rather than verifiable sources are becoming increasingly annoying. Please, note that wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Original research, such as the new definition of the Three-pass protocol are not welcome. Rather you should reflect what is already published (see WP:OR). Cryptography is not as easy as one might think first. In particular, you should refer to source if you want to claim an attack against a cryptosystem (such as you did with Massey-Omura cryptosystem) or if you want to claim that a scheme is secure against a certain type of attack (e.g. you claim that certain three-pass protocols are secure against certain attacks). In fact, your claims can shown to be incorrect. Please stop removing requests for citations, just because you might think that certain facts are true. There are quite a few editors on wikipedia having a PhD, working on one or having similar education and could help out. But remember that finding appropriate citations can take some time. Finally, note that removing contested edits and marking such reverts as minor edits is considered to be rude. Thanks. 85.2.48.141 ( talk) 08:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Word Rebus, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Word Rebus. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Muchness ( talk) 21:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)