![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
![]() Archives |
---|
1. April 27, 2005 – May 21, 2006 |
2. May 21, 2006 – August 9, 2006 |
3. August 9, 2006 – January 14, 2007 |
4.
January 14, 2007 – March 24, 2010
|
^<>^><^><^<^^^><^<^><^><^<<^><^><^^^>^><>^<>^<>^>^<^<^>^<^>^<>^<><^>^<<^^
Lets Us Dance as Kirby! (>^.^)> -{Woo!} Smile Lee 05:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
<(^o^)> -{Raise the roof!} Smile Lee 05:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
(>'.' )> -(That's better and now it has dancing). When in the Consumed Crustacean Talk page, do as the Consumed Crustaceans do! <(^.^<)
Wow, this User Talk building is really nice, I took a long time on the interior decorating. You've probably noticed the green couch, it may be the only thing in this room, unless you count that plasma TV. But, I hope you like it. Smile Lee 09:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
P.S There's probably a slice of cheesecake leftover from the inauguration. You can have it, and I'm pretty sure the Hormel's Chili and hot dogs are still good, so have at 'em. Smile Lee 05:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
<(°.^<)u2 are odd.
How did you make it so no one can edit the main page?-- Laura 00:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
What do you mean by that, friend? -- HubHikari 02:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
The detection of "Fast Walker", if genuine, would be one of the more solid detections of UFOs, probably one of the most difficult of explain. If you AfD it, you can AfD the majority of UFO articles. MaxCosta 00:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
BTW you should probably AfD the article "David fox the satanist" - I think it "seems rather stupid". MaxCosta 00:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
If sites like GNAA can have a wiki article - they're far worst to be honest. Why not TPU.
Furthermore TPU is not a club nor is it about someone. It is an IDEA, come on wikipedia you know what they are surely.
Anyone with half a brain can join. Its not about abuse, its about the birth of a new internet where nothing is free from potential dispute by others, no one is safe. Before this gets deleted, which it probably will. I urge you to reconsider your speedy deletions. Think a little more. Give time for me to add more substance; ideology, methodolgy, a genuine study into why how and what the posting units does and how it exists. You've succesfully demonstrated the thing most people do, judge a book by its cover and for this i forgive your ignorance. This is not an attack on you merely an anoyyance at hasty decisions by people in power with nothing better to do at 23:31 GMT. To be honest I'm off to bed, and if this is still here in the morning I'll judge it as my second chance. Until tommorow.
PU—Preceding unsigned comment added by Posting Unit ( talk • contribs)
I do not own the posting units. I merely posted the article under the posting units username as a mock tribute to the group.. Is the username a problem I could change it if you like. Can you tell me what is going on as i'd really like to retire and go to bed.
I accidently messed up on the page of Ahni Luv can you plese delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilfella106 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, This is the email and the permission to put the text:
Dear Raul,
Opus Dei Awareness Network, Inc. (ODAN) grants you permission to put the web page http://www.odan.org/questionable_practices.htm that appears on the Opus Dei Awareness Network, Inc. (ODAN) web site on Wikipedia.
Sincerely yours,
Dianne DiNicola Executive Director
From: Raúl Bermejo [1] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:48 PM To: odan@odan.org Subject: I need your permission to copy some paragraph of your page
Hi, and sorry for my bad english.
I am an editor of wikipedia. Can you help me, please? see this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_Opus_Dei If you read the historial, I try to put some paragraph about certain questionable practices of Opus Dei. But other wikipedian pro Opus Dei, says that it is a copyviolation to put some parts of this webpage to illustrate the bad practices of the work. Your page is: http://www.odan.org/questionable_practices.htm I need your permission to quote these paragraphs, Is it possible? Best regards Raul
I don't like your deleting pages that aren't experiments. So DON@T DELETE1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abyab ( talk • contribs)
Sorry, i'll not do it again. Sonic 09:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Can you give me a description of vandalizing, and also a colour code, for exemple: 000 - Black That might not be correct, just lay it out like that, please? Sonic 09:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
And thanks for the advise. Sonic 09:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations! You are the current winner wikipedian. I have always been waiting for a wikipedian like you. I just can't find enough praise. What do you want to inprove wikipedia? Sonic 10:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Concerning deletion of the article on Joseph D. Campbell. Now that I've found some verification of Dr. Campbell's biography, separate and distinct from his own books, what is the next step? I have requested on inter=library loan a copy of the article written by Arthur Sager and published Nov. 2002 in the Trumpeter, but as it is a British publication, it may be a while before it arrives. Bejnar 02:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your effort on Links to Web Directories and Search engine. As you might see, I've been trying to help User:Chuck Marean understand why such lists of links aren't appropriate. It doesn't seem to be working... -- mtz206 ( talk) 22:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Can I please have just one more chance, Mr Cock Knocker, sir? I don't know what I'll do with my days if I can't vandalise wikis... Stinky 04:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for mantaining the articles about War for the Throne and its duplicate War for the Throne (Disney). I appreciate your help; I din't expect anyone to watch a short article. Bye -- Starionwolf 04:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I am the author of the Article on The Dark Channel, you have marked it for deletion because you say their is not enough notable sources for my article on the site. Well I hope this helps as noteable sources:
( Dee' 06:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC))
Just thought you might like to know that this page was delleted (speedy) as it has been deleted and recreated 3 times. The last one being a couple of hours before you added the proposed deletion tag. skorpion 07:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Actually I only edited 1 time, the first time the article was blank and I tought someone had vandalized it. Why are you claiming I edited 3 times? ( Dee' 10:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC))
Why did you change my article on Runescape Hiscores??? I worked so hard on that!-- Webstergenius 20:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Your input is most welcome.-- SB | T 20:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean by citing sources. It's an article about a short story. The story itself is the source. Johnny Pez 06:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Greetings! I am glad to say that the above case, Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/ReginaA, has all been taken care of. You can click the above link of see the entire June '06 archive. Thank you for taking the time to report this to the page. Regards, K ilo-Lima| (talk) 11:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Firstly, I am new to Wikipedia and this is the first page I have added. I see that the new page I have created is marked for deletion. I have already answered to the question on web presence(search on google, A9 etc) [2]. Who makes the final decison to keep or delete this page? What will that be based on? and, What else should I do? Thanks . Manikond@gmail.com 01:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I have two more questions.
Thank you for your time and patience.
I'm glad to see someone else patrolling new pages. I was feeling rather lonely, rummaging through Wikipedia's dumping grounds. BTW, I tagged that "lesser known facts about George Washington" article for speedy deletion as an attack page after you tagged it for PROD, but of course I left the PROD on just in case. Erik the Rude 01:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for that explanation, it was truly baffling to me for a while there... what a strange and fascinating world this stuff is W guice 01:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
There's an ongoing RFC about this sort of misbehavior. You may want to comment here or endorse some views. FeloniousMonk 20:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I found it on es:Richard Hoagland, but upon taking a second look and seeing that it has no source there either, I guess it should be removed there as well. -- M e rovingian { T C @} 21:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello Consumed Crustacean, are you interested in becoming an administrator? — Quarl ( talk) 2006-06-28 22:52Z
I don't believe your Skepdic.com link is a good addition to the ionized bracelet page. The article itself is just a sarcastic overview of the obviously weak claims inside Q-Ray's commercials. Firstly, this isn't very academic and not at all encyclopedic. Secondly, the article is about ionized bracelets in general, not about the poor practices of QT Inc.
But, as your edit summary said, you were linking to it primarily because of the interesting articles it links to. I also argue with this. The first two articles that it links to are already linked to directly from the entry. Firstly, the Mayo Clinic study and secondly, Dr. Barrett's Quackwatch entry. Nearly all of the rest of the links deals exclusively with pain relief and arthritis, which have been thoroughly debunked by the Mayo Clinic study and the following FTC injunction. Further external linking on the subject is just beating a dead horse.
The remaining two links are Consumeraffairs.com's complaints about QT Inc's product and an article about some horse racer that mentions the Q-Ray bracelet tangentially. It was clear that the bracelet was on his left hand, while the article was about what he had in his right hand. It really has no bearing on the subject of ionized bracelet that's worth mentioning. As for the consumer complaints, again, they are either about pain relief or poor business practices on the part of QT Inc. Neither subject warrants further discussion within, or external linking from the entry in question.
Do you disagree with any of this? – Gunslinger47 03:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry that my time was off. It wasn't that I was calling my timezone (UTC). I know that my timezone is (UTC-6). The last two entries I made on the Super Smash Bros. Brawl talk page I was on a different computer than my own and the clock on the computer was off, so when I added six hours, my time was inadvertantly one hour ahead. Thanks for looking into it, though. SaturnYoshi| TALK 14:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I appologise for my edits on your page. They were just meant to be a joke. DavidJJJ 09:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Did you know that the Houston Press cited an earlier version of the Hightower High School article (which you reverted) as a way of showing malcontent with the principal. I tried to rewrite this in an NPOV manner. WhisperToMe 22:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
The "fluffle" is a name that me and my mate give to a hackle. we came up with it at the ISCRIM meeting at Bisley. fluffle - fluffy puffy thing. it is only a joke name, so dont re-direct it to hackle.
"If the accuser has not formed a proper evidence page, you are allowed to remove the notice from your user page." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acromagalin ( talk • contribs)
Why did you remove the links that I put on Aura (paranormal) they are related to Aura (paranormal). John R G 18:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
The sites that I put on Aura (paranormal) are about Auras and how to see auras so I feel that they are important links for that site. I feel that they need to be put back on Aura (paranormal). John R G 19:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Please don't add nonsense to my page. If you can to talk to me, fins, but don't vandalise my user pasge. Thank you Reggae Sanderz 19:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
If you wish to replace it, discuss the matter, or view my explanation for removal, feel free. I left my remarks at Talk:Bobbi Ethier. BigNate37 T· C 17:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I took out any mention of an organization. Is this okay? -- Hglff 04:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia, “A topic has notability if it is known outside a narrow interest group or constituency, or should be because of its particular importance or impact.” The HGLFF is an educational tool offered to a very broad audience ranging beyond just sexual orientation. The festival takes place in venues all around Houston, TX. They’ve also had artists and activists from around the U.S come to Houston for lectures and panel discussions broadening their audience even further. I’ve also edited the article by adding more history, a link to their website and citing from reliable resources such as the Houston Press and The Houston Chronicle. Please help understand what's missing. -- Hglff 03:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
The guy who posted that Paquin rant is back. I'm not sure what to do with the rant he re-posted. For now I stated that it was in the older version of the article and that it was removed for a lack of sources.
The Press article does mention the FBISD dress code "over-enforcement". WhisperToMe 16:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Look for ^BuGs^. And I make it personal? -- Shane ( talk/ contrib) 07:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Please stop posting that "sock" tag on my page. Just because I commented in an AFD doesn't mean my account belongs to User:Scottydukes. How would you feel if your page was vandalized like that? Reggae Sanderz 10:22, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for removing your delete tag. I can't believe I didn't realise that was a vanity page. Ah well, we're in agreement now, that' what counts! Mallanox 00:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
It's pretty obvious to me as well that we've got ourselves a reasonable case of sockpuppetry. Do you think it's worthwhile taking it to the appropriate authorities, or is it sufficiently low-grade that it doesn't matter? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BigHaz ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
![]() Archives |
---|
1. April 27, 2005 – May 21, 2006 |
2. May 21, 2006 – August 9, 2006 |
3. August 9, 2006 – January 14, 2007 |
4.
January 14, 2007 – March 24, 2010
|
^<>^><^><^<^^^><^<^><^><^<<^><^><^^^>^><>^<>^<>^>^<^<^>^<^>^<>^<><^>^<<^^
Lets Us Dance as Kirby! (>^.^)> -{Woo!} Smile Lee 05:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
<(^o^)> -{Raise the roof!} Smile Lee 05:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
(>'.' )> -(That's better and now it has dancing). When in the Consumed Crustacean Talk page, do as the Consumed Crustaceans do! <(^.^<)
Wow, this User Talk building is really nice, I took a long time on the interior decorating. You've probably noticed the green couch, it may be the only thing in this room, unless you count that plasma TV. But, I hope you like it. Smile Lee 09:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
P.S There's probably a slice of cheesecake leftover from the inauguration. You can have it, and I'm pretty sure the Hormel's Chili and hot dogs are still good, so have at 'em. Smile Lee 05:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
<(°.^<)u2 are odd.
How did you make it so no one can edit the main page?-- Laura 00:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
What do you mean by that, friend? -- HubHikari 02:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
The detection of "Fast Walker", if genuine, would be one of the more solid detections of UFOs, probably one of the most difficult of explain. If you AfD it, you can AfD the majority of UFO articles. MaxCosta 00:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
BTW you should probably AfD the article "David fox the satanist" - I think it "seems rather stupid". MaxCosta 00:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
If sites like GNAA can have a wiki article - they're far worst to be honest. Why not TPU.
Furthermore TPU is not a club nor is it about someone. It is an IDEA, come on wikipedia you know what they are surely.
Anyone with half a brain can join. Its not about abuse, its about the birth of a new internet where nothing is free from potential dispute by others, no one is safe. Before this gets deleted, which it probably will. I urge you to reconsider your speedy deletions. Think a little more. Give time for me to add more substance; ideology, methodolgy, a genuine study into why how and what the posting units does and how it exists. You've succesfully demonstrated the thing most people do, judge a book by its cover and for this i forgive your ignorance. This is not an attack on you merely an anoyyance at hasty decisions by people in power with nothing better to do at 23:31 GMT. To be honest I'm off to bed, and if this is still here in the morning I'll judge it as my second chance. Until tommorow.
PU—Preceding unsigned comment added by Posting Unit ( talk • contribs)
I do not own the posting units. I merely posted the article under the posting units username as a mock tribute to the group.. Is the username a problem I could change it if you like. Can you tell me what is going on as i'd really like to retire and go to bed.
I accidently messed up on the page of Ahni Luv can you plese delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilfella106 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, This is the email and the permission to put the text:
Dear Raul,
Opus Dei Awareness Network, Inc. (ODAN) grants you permission to put the web page http://www.odan.org/questionable_practices.htm that appears on the Opus Dei Awareness Network, Inc. (ODAN) web site on Wikipedia.
Sincerely yours,
Dianne DiNicola Executive Director
From: Raúl Bermejo [1] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:48 PM To: odan@odan.org Subject: I need your permission to copy some paragraph of your page
Hi, and sorry for my bad english.
I am an editor of wikipedia. Can you help me, please? see this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_Opus_Dei If you read the historial, I try to put some paragraph about certain questionable practices of Opus Dei. But other wikipedian pro Opus Dei, says that it is a copyviolation to put some parts of this webpage to illustrate the bad practices of the work. Your page is: http://www.odan.org/questionable_practices.htm I need your permission to quote these paragraphs, Is it possible? Best regards Raul
I don't like your deleting pages that aren't experiments. So DON@T DELETE1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abyab ( talk • contribs)
Sorry, i'll not do it again. Sonic 09:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Can you give me a description of vandalizing, and also a colour code, for exemple: 000 - Black That might not be correct, just lay it out like that, please? Sonic 09:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
And thanks for the advise. Sonic 09:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations! You are the current winner wikipedian. I have always been waiting for a wikipedian like you. I just can't find enough praise. What do you want to inprove wikipedia? Sonic 10:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Concerning deletion of the article on Joseph D. Campbell. Now that I've found some verification of Dr. Campbell's biography, separate and distinct from his own books, what is the next step? I have requested on inter=library loan a copy of the article written by Arthur Sager and published Nov. 2002 in the Trumpeter, but as it is a British publication, it may be a while before it arrives. Bejnar 02:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your effort on Links to Web Directories and Search engine. As you might see, I've been trying to help User:Chuck Marean understand why such lists of links aren't appropriate. It doesn't seem to be working... -- mtz206 ( talk) 22:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Can I please have just one more chance, Mr Cock Knocker, sir? I don't know what I'll do with my days if I can't vandalise wikis... Stinky 04:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for mantaining the articles about War for the Throne and its duplicate War for the Throne (Disney). I appreciate your help; I din't expect anyone to watch a short article. Bye -- Starionwolf 04:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I am the author of the Article on The Dark Channel, you have marked it for deletion because you say their is not enough notable sources for my article on the site. Well I hope this helps as noteable sources:
( Dee' 06:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC))
Just thought you might like to know that this page was delleted (speedy) as it has been deleted and recreated 3 times. The last one being a couple of hours before you added the proposed deletion tag. skorpion 07:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Actually I only edited 1 time, the first time the article was blank and I tought someone had vandalized it. Why are you claiming I edited 3 times? ( Dee' 10:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC))
Why did you change my article on Runescape Hiscores??? I worked so hard on that!-- Webstergenius 20:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Your input is most welcome.-- SB | T 20:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean by citing sources. It's an article about a short story. The story itself is the source. Johnny Pez 06:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Greetings! I am glad to say that the above case, Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/ReginaA, has all been taken care of. You can click the above link of see the entire June '06 archive. Thank you for taking the time to report this to the page. Regards, K ilo-Lima| (talk) 11:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Firstly, I am new to Wikipedia and this is the first page I have added. I see that the new page I have created is marked for deletion. I have already answered to the question on web presence(search on google, A9 etc) [2]. Who makes the final decison to keep or delete this page? What will that be based on? and, What else should I do? Thanks . Manikond@gmail.com 01:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I have two more questions.
Thank you for your time and patience.
I'm glad to see someone else patrolling new pages. I was feeling rather lonely, rummaging through Wikipedia's dumping grounds. BTW, I tagged that "lesser known facts about George Washington" article for speedy deletion as an attack page after you tagged it for PROD, but of course I left the PROD on just in case. Erik the Rude 01:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for that explanation, it was truly baffling to me for a while there... what a strange and fascinating world this stuff is W guice 01:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
There's an ongoing RFC about this sort of misbehavior. You may want to comment here or endorse some views. FeloniousMonk 20:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I found it on es:Richard Hoagland, but upon taking a second look and seeing that it has no source there either, I guess it should be removed there as well. -- M e rovingian { T C @} 21:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello Consumed Crustacean, are you interested in becoming an administrator? — Quarl ( talk) 2006-06-28 22:52Z
I don't believe your Skepdic.com link is a good addition to the ionized bracelet page. The article itself is just a sarcastic overview of the obviously weak claims inside Q-Ray's commercials. Firstly, this isn't very academic and not at all encyclopedic. Secondly, the article is about ionized bracelets in general, not about the poor practices of QT Inc.
But, as your edit summary said, you were linking to it primarily because of the interesting articles it links to. I also argue with this. The first two articles that it links to are already linked to directly from the entry. Firstly, the Mayo Clinic study and secondly, Dr. Barrett's Quackwatch entry. Nearly all of the rest of the links deals exclusively with pain relief and arthritis, which have been thoroughly debunked by the Mayo Clinic study and the following FTC injunction. Further external linking on the subject is just beating a dead horse.
The remaining two links are Consumeraffairs.com's complaints about QT Inc's product and an article about some horse racer that mentions the Q-Ray bracelet tangentially. It was clear that the bracelet was on his left hand, while the article was about what he had in his right hand. It really has no bearing on the subject of ionized bracelet that's worth mentioning. As for the consumer complaints, again, they are either about pain relief or poor business practices on the part of QT Inc. Neither subject warrants further discussion within, or external linking from the entry in question.
Do you disagree with any of this? – Gunslinger47 03:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry that my time was off. It wasn't that I was calling my timezone (UTC). I know that my timezone is (UTC-6). The last two entries I made on the Super Smash Bros. Brawl talk page I was on a different computer than my own and the clock on the computer was off, so when I added six hours, my time was inadvertantly one hour ahead. Thanks for looking into it, though. SaturnYoshi| TALK 14:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I appologise for my edits on your page. They were just meant to be a joke. DavidJJJ 09:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Did you know that the Houston Press cited an earlier version of the Hightower High School article (which you reverted) as a way of showing malcontent with the principal. I tried to rewrite this in an NPOV manner. WhisperToMe 22:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
The "fluffle" is a name that me and my mate give to a hackle. we came up with it at the ISCRIM meeting at Bisley. fluffle - fluffy puffy thing. it is only a joke name, so dont re-direct it to hackle.
"If the accuser has not formed a proper evidence page, you are allowed to remove the notice from your user page." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acromagalin ( talk • contribs)
Why did you remove the links that I put on Aura (paranormal) they are related to Aura (paranormal). John R G 18:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
The sites that I put on Aura (paranormal) are about Auras and how to see auras so I feel that they are important links for that site. I feel that they need to be put back on Aura (paranormal). John R G 19:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Please don't add nonsense to my page. If you can to talk to me, fins, but don't vandalise my user pasge. Thank you Reggae Sanderz 19:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
If you wish to replace it, discuss the matter, or view my explanation for removal, feel free. I left my remarks at Talk:Bobbi Ethier. BigNate37 T· C 17:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I took out any mention of an organization. Is this okay? -- Hglff 04:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia, “A topic has notability if it is known outside a narrow interest group or constituency, or should be because of its particular importance or impact.” The HGLFF is an educational tool offered to a very broad audience ranging beyond just sexual orientation. The festival takes place in venues all around Houston, TX. They’ve also had artists and activists from around the U.S come to Houston for lectures and panel discussions broadening their audience even further. I’ve also edited the article by adding more history, a link to their website and citing from reliable resources such as the Houston Press and The Houston Chronicle. Please help understand what's missing. -- Hglff 03:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
The guy who posted that Paquin rant is back. I'm not sure what to do with the rant he re-posted. For now I stated that it was in the older version of the article and that it was removed for a lack of sources.
The Press article does mention the FBISD dress code "over-enforcement". WhisperToMe 16:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Look for ^BuGs^. And I make it personal? -- Shane ( talk/ contrib) 07:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Please stop posting that "sock" tag on my page. Just because I commented in an AFD doesn't mean my account belongs to User:Scottydukes. How would you feel if your page was vandalized like that? Reggae Sanderz 10:22, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for removing your delete tag. I can't believe I didn't realise that was a vanity page. Ah well, we're in agreement now, that' what counts! Mallanox 00:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
It's pretty obvious to me as well that we've got ourselves a reasonable case of sockpuppetry. Do you think it's worthwhile taking it to the appropriate authorities, or is it sufficiently low-grade that it doesn't matter? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BigHaz ( talk • contribs)