Welcome to Wikipedia, Conradcnn! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije ( talk) 22:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Conradcnn,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CNN Young African Writers Forum (CNNYAW) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije ( talk) 22:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CNNYAW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNNYAW until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 07:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
CNNYAW. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
09:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to remove
Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be
blocked from editing.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
15:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Conradcnn. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
15:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
07:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Please do not place any more speedy tags until you have read WP:NPP and WP:CSD. The page Toluna was already tagged with WP:CSD#G11, which was enough. You added WP:CSD#A7, but the article made claims which could be regarded as claims of significance (remember that A7 is a low bar and does not require sources). You also added WP:CSD#A1, WP:CSD#A3 and WP:CSD#G1, which were plain wrong - the article had content, it was not nonsense and its subject was clear. Adding excessive and inappropriate speedy tags is confusing to the article author and does nothing to help them understand how to do better. JohnCD ( talk) 22:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
09:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Conradcnn! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije ( talk) 22:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Conradcnn,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CNN Young African Writers Forum (CNNYAW) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije ( talk) 22:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CNNYAW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNNYAW until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 07:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
CNNYAW. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
09:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to remove
Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be
blocked from editing.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
15:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Conradcnn. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.
2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk)
15:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
07:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Please do not place any more speedy tags until you have read WP:NPP and WP:CSD. The page Toluna was already tagged with WP:CSD#G11, which was enough. You added WP:CSD#A7, but the article made claims which could be regarded as claims of significance (remember that A7 is a low bar and does not require sources). You also added WP:CSD#A1, WP:CSD#A3 and WP:CSD#G1, which were plain wrong - the article had content, it was not nonsense and its subject was clear. Adding excessive and inappropriate speedy tags is confusing to the article author and does nothing to help them understand how to do better. JohnCD ( talk) 22:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
09:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)