![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
An arbitration case regarding Tree shaping has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dougweller ( talk) 15:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Colincbn, hi, I was noticing that your talkpage is getting a bit long. If you'd like, I could setup an archivebot for you? It would automatically archive any messages that hadn't had any activity in a certain amount of time (like 60 days). Then you wouldn't have to worry about it anymore. Let me know, -- El on ka 14:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Colin,
this
is just an encapsulation of
. I had a feeling you thought you had "vectorized" it. You have not vectorized it, there is no easy way to vectorize it well, and even if there were, vector representation would be far less efficient because the image of natural origin. Please don't do this again.
Dzenanz (
talk)
08:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Colincbn, your recent comment at the Tree shaping talkpage could be construed as a borderline personal attack, [1] since you are directly challenging the motives of another editor. I would ask you to please try to speak in a more measured fashion? As for your concern, please rest assured that the discussion is being closely monitored. At this time, ?oygul has asked two questions, a few days apart. Both appear to be reasonable questions, directly related to the discussion, so I am not seeing anything that looks like a violation of the ArbCom sanctions. If you continue to challenge things with the language that you've been using though, and creating inflammatory section headers like "This is ridiculous", then that could be seen as disruptive, which would be in violation. So please, tone things down a bit? Even better, consider modifying your existing post? And please, just be patient for a few days, and let the RM run its course? Thanks, -- El on ka 02:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I have no reference, but made the discovery some time ago. I looked at the Appeal to Tradition article and I do not think it can be classified as a subset. However, the opposite may be true.
As for the rest of the information you provided to aid in my discussing the topic with the community. Im not clear on. I will look into it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VindicatedVigilante ( talk • contribs) 05:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
It seems you have asked me a question. To insure that there can be no misunderstanding down the line will you please edit your comment to add my name if that is in fact the case. I'm finished for today but I will answer you in the next day or so. Thanks Blackash have a chat 09:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Colincbnさん、はじめまして! 私は、主に日本語版Wikipediaで活動してます Damena ( talk)です。Colincbnさんは、 ja-5のUserということなので、日本語で書きます。
私は、Colincbnさんに相談したいことがあります。先日、私は Dinosaur brains and intelligenceというarticleで、 #Sapient dinosaursというsectionをつくりました。しかし、私のEnglishは完全ではありません。私が書いたsentencesには、grammatical mistakesがあるかもしれません。そこで私は、日本語とEnglishの両方をつかえる人にcheckをお願いしたいと考えました。私は Wikipedia:Local Embassyを探し、Colincbnさんをみつけました。Colincbnさんは、correction可能ですか?-- Damena ( talk) 08:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Colincbn, this comment was unacceptable. [5] Accordingly, here is a formal warning about the potential of discretionary sanctions:
Please try to moderate your own behavior so that sanctions are not necessary. Thanks, -- El on ka 01:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
An arbitration case regarding Tree shaping has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dougweller ( talk) 15:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Colincbn, hi, I was noticing that your talkpage is getting a bit long. If you'd like, I could setup an archivebot for you? It would automatically archive any messages that hadn't had any activity in a certain amount of time (like 60 days). Then you wouldn't have to worry about it anymore. Let me know, -- El on ka 14:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Colin,
this
is just an encapsulation of
. I had a feeling you thought you had "vectorized" it. You have not vectorized it, there is no easy way to vectorize it well, and even if there were, vector representation would be far less efficient because the image of natural origin. Please don't do this again.
Dzenanz (
talk)
08:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Colincbn, your recent comment at the Tree shaping talkpage could be construed as a borderline personal attack, [1] since you are directly challenging the motives of another editor. I would ask you to please try to speak in a more measured fashion? As for your concern, please rest assured that the discussion is being closely monitored. At this time, ?oygul has asked two questions, a few days apart. Both appear to be reasonable questions, directly related to the discussion, so I am not seeing anything that looks like a violation of the ArbCom sanctions. If you continue to challenge things with the language that you've been using though, and creating inflammatory section headers like "This is ridiculous", then that could be seen as disruptive, which would be in violation. So please, tone things down a bit? Even better, consider modifying your existing post? And please, just be patient for a few days, and let the RM run its course? Thanks, -- El on ka 02:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I have no reference, but made the discovery some time ago. I looked at the Appeal to Tradition article and I do not think it can be classified as a subset. However, the opposite may be true.
As for the rest of the information you provided to aid in my discussing the topic with the community. Im not clear on. I will look into it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VindicatedVigilante ( talk • contribs) 05:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
It seems you have asked me a question. To insure that there can be no misunderstanding down the line will you please edit your comment to add my name if that is in fact the case. I'm finished for today but I will answer you in the next day or so. Thanks Blackash have a chat 09:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Colincbnさん、はじめまして! 私は、主に日本語版Wikipediaで活動してます Damena ( talk)です。Colincbnさんは、 ja-5のUserということなので、日本語で書きます。
私は、Colincbnさんに相談したいことがあります。先日、私は Dinosaur brains and intelligenceというarticleで、 #Sapient dinosaursというsectionをつくりました。しかし、私のEnglishは完全ではありません。私が書いたsentencesには、grammatical mistakesがあるかもしれません。そこで私は、日本語とEnglishの両方をつかえる人にcheckをお願いしたいと考えました。私は Wikipedia:Local Embassyを探し、Colincbnさんをみつけました。Colincbnさんは、correction可能ですか?-- Damena ( talk) 08:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Colincbn, this comment was unacceptable. [5] Accordingly, here is a formal warning about the potential of discretionary sanctions:
Please try to moderate your own behavior so that sanctions are not necessary. Thanks, -- El on ka 01:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)