![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
{{ resolved}} Wouldn't it have been better to have relisted Marineland of Canada's RM instead of closing it completely? There was only one comment after I posted substantial evidence of Marineland being the common name and only one of the oppose rationales citing PAGs ( WP:NATURALDAB). Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hi! I was really surprised by your close of Talk:Faizabad_district#Requested_move_14_March_2023. The explanation seemed to assume that the old name was still the common name. But what in the discussion does that assumption rest on? – Uanfala ( talk) 09:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Hello, ClydeFranklin,
If you are going to do NAC CFD closures, please follow through and tag any categories that should be deleted appropriately. For example, I came across Category:Anglophone people and apparently this category should be deleted but it was never tagged for deletion, it still has the CFD tags on it. The other NAC closers do this routinely so please ask them for assistance if the process doesn't seem clear to you. But remember, you can't just close a discussion, you need to make sure that the decision is carried out. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:SpaceX Starship on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hello, ClydeFranklin,
If you are going to close CFD discussions, you have to ClOSE them. That means handling the categories involved in the discussions. In this case, you need to remove the CFD tag from this category, and tag it for speedy deletion including a link back to this CFD discussion (very important). If you don't want to take care of the categories, then please do not attempt to close CFD discussions. Let another, more experienced editor handle this task. You can't do this process halfway, you have to follow through or you aren't enacting a closure decision. If you don't know how to do this, then please ask . Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
one of the other editors who frequent CFDs and do close discussionsI thought of, so can you clarify what Liz is refering to here? I thought the course of action with that CFD was to close as delete and list it at WT:CFDW. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE 03:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Armenia on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
Other notable performances were put in by
Sammi Brie,
Thebiguglyalien,
MyCatIsAChonk,
PCN02WPS, and
AirshipJungleman29.
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
Hello, ClydeFranklin,
Please take care of this empty category that is part of your closure of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 April 21#Category:Rulers of Brittany. And take care of these categories in any future CFDs you choose to close. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hi, I saw that your signature had the icon File:OOUI icon userAdd-ltr.svg, and while I find it clever, unfortunately signatures on Wikipedia are not allowed to have images per WP:SIGIMAGE. Try an emoji instead ;) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 02:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
{{
resolved}}
There is currently a discussion at
Talk:SpaceX Starship regarding a note that a user is repeatedly trying to insert into the "failures" section. The thread is
RfC on "clarifying failure in infobox". Thank you.
DASL51984 (
Speak to me!)
19:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hi, please would you reopen Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_7#Category:Redirects_from_Uighur-language_terms? This was resolved the other way last year for a good reason at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_30#Category:Redirects_from_Uyghur-language_terms, as is linked on the talk page. – Fayenatic London 14:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Australian Survivor contestants. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Happily888 ( talk) 04:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hello, ClydeFranklin,
You can not tag categories like Category:Daughters of heads of state and Category:Daughters of prime ministers for speedy deletion until they are emptied. Please use the bot used at CFD to handle emptying out categories. After they are emptied, then the bot will delete the categories. If you are unsure how this is done, please ask Marco or another CFD regular. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Thank you for closing multiple CFD nominations at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 13. It looks like those closures haven't been acted upon yet so I just wanted to make sure you had the directions right here: WP:CfDClosings. I saw the comment above from Liz so, if you need a little help here, you can get it at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working or feel free to tag me too. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 14:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Libreboot on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} I strongly oppose this move and do not believe there was a consensus for it. Please revert your close. Srnec ( talk) 01:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} I would have strongly opposed this one too. It goes against point #1 at WP:SOVEREIGN. I don't know how you came to that move over the one actually proposed. Please explain. Srnec ( talk) 01:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Hi ClydeFranklin. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! DanCherek ( talk) 22:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
![]() |
Thanks for signing my guestbook, and for your extensive work around Wikipedia! I wanted to ask you, what’s wrong with only having 5,000 edits? - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 20:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) |
{{ resolved}} Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's currently at MFD, and a large cleanup project is underway to repair the citations damaged by the script. I and several other users have !voted that the script be deleted or disabled, and I wouldn't recommend using it at all unless you thoroughly check every reference it modifies against the previous revision. If you're interested in a more detailed explanation of the script's issues, Folly Mox has provided an excellent summary at the MFD. — SamX [ talk · contribs] 05:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:Romanization of Ukrainian on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:SpaceX Starship on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Per WP:RMNOMIN, No minimum participation is required for requested moves. If no one has objected, go ahead and perform the move as requested... Emphasis original. Please revise your close. Srnec ( talk) 21:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Per lack of participation, ineligible for moving as unopposed.But (1) that's not true, that's not the rule, and (2) it wasn't merely unopposed, it had had an explicit support. Srnec ( talk) 01:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Per lack of participation, ineligible for moving as unopposed. NPASR.No Prejudice Against Speedy Renomination. (1) what is the rule then? and (2) that support vote was a weak one which was still skeptical, and doesn't singlehandedly outweigh the reverting reason. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 17:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
making a bold move and being reverted. To what do you refer? My bold move of 4 September 2019 had the same rationale as the RM:
mostly not an archdiocese. This move was undone on 15 May 2023 with the edit summary
Fix grammar: Different from document content.You say that the support !vote does not
singlehandedly outweigh the reverting reason. But what is that reason? It was a nonsensical reference to fixing grammar.
{{ resolved}} I note that the categories in this discussion which you closed are still not merged/deleted. Laurel Lodged ( talk) 14:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Thank you for your careful and detailed summary — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 10:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Uhh... hmm. I closed Talk:Brihadisvara Temple, Thanjavur#Requested move 7 June 2023 as moved two minutes after you relisted it. Do you have a strong opinion on whether it should be moved or relisted? I'm open to either, but my interpretation of WP:RMNOMIN seems to say this should go through as an unopposed move request. I'll revert my close for the moment until we clear this up (since the move itself didn't go through using RMcloser). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Aleksandar Vučić on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
{{ resolved}} Wouldn't it have been better to have relisted Marineland of Canada's RM instead of closing it completely? There was only one comment after I posted substantial evidence of Marineland being the common name and only one of the oppose rationales citing PAGs ( WP:NATURALDAB). Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hi! I was really surprised by your close of Talk:Faizabad_district#Requested_move_14_March_2023. The explanation seemed to assume that the old name was still the common name. But what in the discussion does that assumption rest on? – Uanfala ( talk) 09:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Hello, ClydeFranklin,
If you are going to do NAC CFD closures, please follow through and tag any categories that should be deleted appropriately. For example, I came across Category:Anglophone people and apparently this category should be deleted but it was never tagged for deletion, it still has the CFD tags on it. The other NAC closers do this routinely so please ask them for assistance if the process doesn't seem clear to you. But remember, you can't just close a discussion, you need to make sure that the decision is carried out. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:SpaceX Starship on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hello, ClydeFranklin,
If you are going to close CFD discussions, you have to ClOSE them. That means handling the categories involved in the discussions. In this case, you need to remove the CFD tag from this category, and tag it for speedy deletion including a link back to this CFD discussion (very important). If you don't want to take care of the categories, then please do not attempt to close CFD discussions. Let another, more experienced editor handle this task. You can't do this process halfway, you have to follow through or you aren't enacting a closure decision. If you don't know how to do this, then please ask . Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
one of the other editors who frequent CFDs and do close discussionsI thought of, so can you clarify what Liz is refering to here? I thought the course of action with that CFD was to close as delete and list it at WT:CFDW. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE 03:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Armenia on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
Other notable performances were put in by
Sammi Brie,
Thebiguglyalien,
MyCatIsAChonk,
PCN02WPS, and
AirshipJungleman29.
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
Hello, ClydeFranklin,
Please take care of this empty category that is part of your closure of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 April 21#Category:Rulers of Brittany. And take care of these categories in any future CFDs you choose to close. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hi, I saw that your signature had the icon File:OOUI icon userAdd-ltr.svg, and while I find it clever, unfortunately signatures on Wikipedia are not allowed to have images per WP:SIGIMAGE. Try an emoji instead ;) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 02:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
{{
resolved}}
There is currently a discussion at
Talk:SpaceX Starship regarding a note that a user is repeatedly trying to insert into the "failures" section. The thread is
RfC on "clarifying failure in infobox". Thank you.
DASL51984 (
Speak to me!)
19:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hi, please would you reopen Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_7#Category:Redirects_from_Uighur-language_terms? This was resolved the other way last year for a good reason at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_30#Category:Redirects_from_Uyghur-language_terms, as is linked on the talk page. – Fayenatic London 14:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Australian Survivor contestants. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Happily888 ( talk) 04:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Hello, ClydeFranklin,
You can not tag categories like Category:Daughters of heads of state and Category:Daughters of prime ministers for speedy deletion until they are emptied. Please use the bot used at CFD to handle emptying out categories. After they are emptied, then the bot will delete the categories. If you are unsure how this is done, please ask Marco or another CFD regular. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Thank you for closing multiple CFD nominations at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 13. It looks like those closures haven't been acted upon yet so I just wanted to make sure you had the directions right here: WP:CfDClosings. I saw the comment above from Liz so, if you need a little help here, you can get it at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working or feel free to tag me too. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 14:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Libreboot on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} I strongly oppose this move and do not believe there was a consensus for it. Please revert your close. Srnec ( talk) 01:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} I would have strongly opposed this one too. It goes against point #1 at WP:SOVEREIGN. I don't know how you came to that move over the one actually proposed. Please explain. Srnec ( talk) 01:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
Hi ClydeFranklin. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! DanCherek ( talk) 22:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}}
![]() |
Thanks for signing my guestbook, and for your extensive work around Wikipedia! I wanted to ask you, what’s wrong with only having 5,000 edits? - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 20:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) |
{{ resolved}} Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's currently at MFD, and a large cleanup project is underway to repair the citations damaged by the script. I and several other users have !voted that the script be deleted or disabled, and I wouldn't recommend using it at all unless you thoroughly check every reference it modifies against the previous revision. If you're interested in a more detailed explanation of the script's issues, Folly Mox has provided an excellent summary at the MFD. — SamX [ talk · contribs] 05:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:Romanization of Ukrainian on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:SpaceX Starship on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Per WP:RMNOMIN, No minimum participation is required for requested moves. If no one has objected, go ahead and perform the move as requested... Emphasis original. Please revise your close. Srnec ( talk) 21:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Per lack of participation, ineligible for moving as unopposed.But (1) that's not true, that's not the rule, and (2) it wasn't merely unopposed, it had had an explicit support. Srnec ( talk) 01:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Per lack of participation, ineligible for moving as unopposed. NPASR.No Prejudice Against Speedy Renomination. (1) what is the rule then? and (2) that support vote was a weak one which was still skeptical, and doesn't singlehandedly outweigh the reverting reason. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 17:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
making a bold move and being reverted. To what do you refer? My bold move of 4 September 2019 had the same rationale as the RM:
mostly not an archdiocese. This move was undone on 15 May 2023 with the edit summary
Fix grammar: Different from document content.You say that the support !vote does not
singlehandedly outweigh the reverting reason. But what is that reason? It was a nonsensical reference to fixing grammar.
{{ resolved}} I note that the categories in this discussion which you closed are still not merged/deleted. Laurel Lodged ( talk) 14:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Thank you for your careful and detailed summary — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 10:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
{{ resolved}} Uhh... hmm. I closed Talk:Brihadisvara Temple, Thanjavur#Requested move 7 June 2023 as moved two minutes after you relisted it. Do you have a strong opinion on whether it should be moved or relisted? I'm open to either, but my interpretation of WP:RMNOMIN seems to say this should go through as an unopposed move request. I'll revert my close for the moment until we clear this up (since the move itself didn't go through using RMcloser). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Aleksandar Vučić on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)