![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
User talk:TTN, which uses ClueBot III, has the archive index starting with 2, 1, 3, 4... instead of 1, 2, 3, 4... What is the reason for this? JIP | Talk 13:57, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Also: does it take into consideration the fact that the user used the “Preview” function at least once before posting the edit?
I’m asking because I have a feeling that my edit would not have been considered vandalism if the bot had seen that it was accompanied by a carefully worded summary and had been previewed.
I read the FAQ and other documentation, so I understand that the bot “learns”, which is very nice, but isn’t it desirable that users like me get an opportunity to learn as well? Failing that, the result of what I consider to be an unjustified revert by this bot is that I am that much less likely to bother to contribute anything to Wikipedia from now on. 74.58.147.69 ( talk) 14:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
ClueBot NG is flagged as a pending changes reviewer. But, it have never accepted pending changes ( /info/en/?search=Special:Log?type=review&user=ClueBot+NG&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=accept) or unaccepted accepted revisions ( /info/en/?search=Special:Log?type=review&user=ClueBot+NG&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=unaccept), so it has never used the rights. Furthermore, looking at the BRFAs I found I don't see any approval to act as a reviewer. The rights were added by @ Cobi in 2010 with the summary "+ClueBot's flags." - are these still needed? Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 21:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
User talk:TTN, which uses ClueBot III, has the archive index starting with 2, 1, 3, 4... instead of 1, 2, 3, 4... What is the reason for this? JIP | Talk 13:57, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Also: does it take into consideration the fact that the user used the “Preview” function at least once before posting the edit?
I’m asking because I have a feeling that my edit would not have been considered vandalism if the bot had seen that it was accompanied by a carefully worded summary and had been previewed.
I read the FAQ and other documentation, so I understand that the bot “learns”, which is very nice, but isn’t it desirable that users like me get an opportunity to learn as well? Failing that, the result of what I consider to be an unjustified revert by this bot is that I am that much less likely to bother to contribute anything to Wikipedia from now on. 74.58.147.69 ( talk) 14:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
ClueBot NG is flagged as a pending changes reviewer. But, it have never accepted pending changes ( /info/en/?search=Special:Log?type=review&user=ClueBot+NG&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=accept) or unaccepted accepted revisions ( /info/en/?search=Special:Log?type=review&user=ClueBot+NG&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=unaccept), so it has never used the rights. Furthermore, looking at the BRFAs I found I don't see any approval to act as a reviewer. The rights were added by @ Cobi in 2010 with the summary "+ClueBot's flags." - are these still needed? Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 21:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)