This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi! I helped with a new editor training session recently, and three of the new editors received ClueBot auto-reverts for good-faith edits, and they were quite confused. I reported the false positives on their behalf, but I would also like to make suggestions for revising the automated user talk page message to be more understandable for newcomers. I tried visiting the IRC channel listed at User:ClueBot NG#IRC Channel to discuss this, but the one other human there said it wasn't the right place. Where should I go to learn more about your thinking for this talk page message and discuss it, so I can make informed suggestions for improving it? And is that IRC advice outdated? Thanks! Dreamyshade ( talk) 17:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
67.169.46.241 ( talk) 23:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
You may not be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you help Wikipedia. ThisGuyIsGreat ( talk) 00:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Um...I have never been to that cheer-leading article in my life! WTF??? 112.198.83.99 ( talk) 07:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
ClueBot NG should analyse all edits of one user, not just one edit. I had got false positives by ClueBot NG, with examples in my talkpage. See the histories of those edits too. 125.239.151.237 ( talk) 06:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
{{ atop}} Thanks for your guideline. ( Gopikarthikeyan.k ( talk) 09:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC))
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi! I helped with a new editor training session recently, and three of the new editors received ClueBot auto-reverts for good-faith edits, and they were quite confused. I reported the false positives on their behalf, but I would also like to make suggestions for revising the automated user talk page message to be more understandable for newcomers. I tried visiting the IRC channel listed at User:ClueBot NG#IRC Channel to discuss this, but the one other human there said it wasn't the right place. Where should I go to learn more about your thinking for this talk page message and discuss it, so I can make informed suggestions for improving it? And is that IRC advice outdated? Thanks! Dreamyshade ( talk) 17:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
67.169.46.241 ( talk) 23:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
You may not be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you help Wikipedia. ThisGuyIsGreat ( talk) 00:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Um...I have never been to that cheer-leading article in my life! WTF??? 112.198.83.99 ( talk) 07:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
ClueBot NG should analyse all edits of one user, not just one edit. I had got false positives by ClueBot NG, with examples in my talkpage. See the histories of those edits too. 125.239.151.237 ( talk) 06:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
{{ atop}} Thanks for your guideline. ( Gopikarthikeyan.k ( talk) 09:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC))