![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Why is User:ClueBot_III/Master_Detailed_Indices/Talk:2012_Benghazi_attack blank? And looking at the page history, it looks like ClueBot III is edit-warring with itself (repeatedly deleting its own changes)? — Lowellian ( reply) 06:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
If there is a possible vandalism, do not revert it too soon. Check it especially the article you are editing is not familiar enough to you for you've done a great mistake. After all, YOU, BOT, are to Blamed!!!!!!-- 114.38.195.251 ( talk) 15:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I have read through the ClueBot's policies and would like to join.. I have read through the dataset as well... I'm also under Theo's CVU Academy, a constant support to the Cluebot... Please let me know if I can join... And by the way, you stole around 5 of my reverts, because you found articles a second faster then I did!!! The Wikimon ( talk) 14:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Not sure if this is the right place to ask. I applied for access to the Cluebot review interface [1] to help classify edits. It's been about a week, and no response. Should I apply again, or can I find out if there is a problem with my application? RudolfRed ( talk) 16:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! RudolfRed ( talk) 23:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Can you and Oxfordwang stop threatening me? 82.153.101.160 ( talk) 13:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
You undid my edit to the page 108_(number) page, although it was a valid and true edit. I hope your programming gets checked frequently for errors, as you often have false positives. 67.43.19.26 ( talk) 16:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
[2]. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 09:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I would report this through the usual channels but cluebot.org and report.cluebot.org seem to be down. 1593116 was mostly (if not all) a false positive. Someone actually cleaned up a huge amount of vandalism on the DVD article and ClueBot brought the vandalism back. -- andrew ( talk) 15:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
It's archiving to User talk:Nerdfighter/Archives/ 9 instead of User talk:Nerdfighter/Archive 9. Help? nerd fighter 16:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm currently building up to the first release of WP:Snuggle, a newcomer socialization system that's similar in design to WP:Huggle, but geared towards identifying good newcomers who need help. As part of this system, I have a simple Bayesian model determining the probability that a newcomer is editing in good faith based on per edit vandal scores published by [[WP:STiki]. Sadly, STiki only scores main namespace revisions. I'm posting this message in hope that I'd be able to use ClueBot NG's scores to boost my coverage to revisions performed anywhere in the wiki. Do you publish an API or is there a way I could obtain regular data dumps of the scores ClueBot NG generates? -- EpochFail( talk • work) 15:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
If you report a false positive, then is there a way to find out if the request was handled? (In an earlier version of the interface I think that somebody posted a response to each one on-wiki, but I do not think you do that any more.) The reporting interface says that "Status of the report and comments can be seen from within the report panel." Is that still true? (I do not want to have to agree to Google's TOS just to be able to access the database.) Bwrs ( talk) 01:52, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Are you european?If you don't know about Central Asian history then don't edit this article.If you want to edit then contact with WikiProject Mongols and write here in my talkYour edit is useless, you removed useful informations, historic data.There were basic informations that knows every man who interests Mongolian history.Ask members of this project before you do anything!
A simple google search would tell you his nickname is Billy. This was a positive contribution to a wiki page. I understand I have previous for vandalising but this was a meaningful edit. Please remove my warning as it is totally out of order. Or at the very least explain it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.150.187 ( talk) 21:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind help, but this is a flawed system i must say when adding a name is classed as vandalism. Maybe wiki should have invested the millions us users helped them raise in system that actual works and doesn't bite the hand of those who feed it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.150.187 ( talk) 22:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
ClueBot NG is not made by Wikipedia / Wikimedia Staff, in fact I don't believe any of the bots are. Wikipedia bots are made by volunteer editors like you and me with the skill to make them and be allowed to run them on Wikipedia. MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) - (Cakes) 22:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
here and here. -- Lexein ( talk) 05:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
While ClueBot NG is very effective it's not perfect, thanks for pointing them out. I'm sure one of ClueBot's owners can use those misses to better the bot. MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) - (Cakes) 22:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I reported a false positive, I hope properly. I'll omit the praise you richly deserve because apparently it doesn't go here. But I want to point out that I'm not sure I did the "revert the cluebot reversion" process right. That's because there was the form which I used (which was great, BTW), but there was also a page describing a complicated procedure to report false positives involving sending you a MySQL record address. However, the message on my talk page did not include anything about MySQL:
Suggestion: If that page about using MySQL records to report a false positive is obsolete, you might consider removing it.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.165.126 ( talk) 02:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Why is User:ClueBot_III/Master_Detailed_Indices/Talk:2012_Benghazi_attack blank? And looking at the page history, it looks like ClueBot III is edit-warring with itself (repeatedly deleting its own changes)? — Lowellian ( reply) 06:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
If there is a possible vandalism, do not revert it too soon. Check it especially the article you are editing is not familiar enough to you for you've done a great mistake. After all, YOU, BOT, are to Blamed!!!!!!-- 114.38.195.251 ( talk) 15:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I have read through the ClueBot's policies and would like to join.. I have read through the dataset as well... I'm also under Theo's CVU Academy, a constant support to the Cluebot... Please let me know if I can join... And by the way, you stole around 5 of my reverts, because you found articles a second faster then I did!!! The Wikimon ( talk) 14:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Not sure if this is the right place to ask. I applied for access to the Cluebot review interface [1] to help classify edits. It's been about a week, and no response. Should I apply again, or can I find out if there is a problem with my application? RudolfRed ( talk) 16:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! RudolfRed ( talk) 23:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Can you and Oxfordwang stop threatening me? 82.153.101.160 ( talk) 13:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
You undid my edit to the page 108_(number) page, although it was a valid and true edit. I hope your programming gets checked frequently for errors, as you often have false positives. 67.43.19.26 ( talk) 16:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
[2]. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 09:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I would report this through the usual channels but cluebot.org and report.cluebot.org seem to be down. 1593116 was mostly (if not all) a false positive. Someone actually cleaned up a huge amount of vandalism on the DVD article and ClueBot brought the vandalism back. -- andrew ( talk) 15:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
It's archiving to User talk:Nerdfighter/Archives/ 9 instead of User talk:Nerdfighter/Archive 9. Help? nerd fighter 16:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm currently building up to the first release of WP:Snuggle, a newcomer socialization system that's similar in design to WP:Huggle, but geared towards identifying good newcomers who need help. As part of this system, I have a simple Bayesian model determining the probability that a newcomer is editing in good faith based on per edit vandal scores published by [[WP:STiki]. Sadly, STiki only scores main namespace revisions. I'm posting this message in hope that I'd be able to use ClueBot NG's scores to boost my coverage to revisions performed anywhere in the wiki. Do you publish an API or is there a way I could obtain regular data dumps of the scores ClueBot NG generates? -- EpochFail( talk • work) 15:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
If you report a false positive, then is there a way to find out if the request was handled? (In an earlier version of the interface I think that somebody posted a response to each one on-wiki, but I do not think you do that any more.) The reporting interface says that "Status of the report and comments can be seen from within the report panel." Is that still true? (I do not want to have to agree to Google's TOS just to be able to access the database.) Bwrs ( talk) 01:52, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Are you european?If you don't know about Central Asian history then don't edit this article.If you want to edit then contact with WikiProject Mongols and write here in my talkYour edit is useless, you removed useful informations, historic data.There were basic informations that knows every man who interests Mongolian history.Ask members of this project before you do anything!
A simple google search would tell you his nickname is Billy. This was a positive contribution to a wiki page. I understand I have previous for vandalising but this was a meaningful edit. Please remove my warning as it is totally out of order. Or at the very least explain it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.150.187 ( talk) 21:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind help, but this is a flawed system i must say when adding a name is classed as vandalism. Maybe wiki should have invested the millions us users helped them raise in system that actual works and doesn't bite the hand of those who feed it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.150.187 ( talk) 22:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
ClueBot NG is not made by Wikipedia / Wikimedia Staff, in fact I don't believe any of the bots are. Wikipedia bots are made by volunteer editors like you and me with the skill to make them and be allowed to run them on Wikipedia. MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) - (Cakes) 22:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
here and here. -- Lexein ( talk) 05:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
While ClueBot NG is very effective it's not perfect, thanks for pointing them out. I'm sure one of ClueBot's owners can use those misses to better the bot. MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) - (Cakes) 22:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I reported a false positive, I hope properly. I'll omit the praise you richly deserve because apparently it doesn't go here. But I want to point out that I'm not sure I did the "revert the cluebot reversion" process right. That's because there was the form which I used (which was great, BTW), but there was also a page describing a complicated procedure to report false positives involving sending you a MySQL record address. However, the message on my talk page did not include anything about MySQL:
Suggestion: If that page about using MySQL records to report a false positive is obsolete, you might consider removing it.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.165.126 ( talk) 02:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)