![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
There is repeating vandalism of people changing songs to "wuss songs". On Just When I Needed You Most ClueBotNG reverted it once in July, but after that left it again. Is "wuss" a word that can be added or something, or is their an other way such edits can be spotted by the bot? Thanks. Joost 99 ( talk) 11:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Well, first of all, http://report.cluebot.cluenet.org/ is not loading. Second of all, if it did load, it would require a revert ID, which ClueBot III (which points here) does not appear to generate.
ClueBot III archived an open RfC here, and this is annoying and took me 15 minutes to figure this out and undo and try to make the report and so forth, so this is not good. What the huge hurry is to clean talk pages of any but the most very recently active discussions I don't know, but at any rate open RfC's shouldn't be archived. It has an {{ rfc}} tag so maybe the bot could search for those. Herostratus ( talk) 15:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Could somebody please explain here? Rcsprinter (talk to me) 20:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey! Before taling to you i want to say to you: Good job with ClueBot NG!. Now, when I'm compiling cluebot (and i do have the required libs), make gives me this error:
In file included from main.cpp:9: standardprocessors.hpp: In constructor 'WPCluebot::CharsetConverter::CharsetConverter(libconfig::Setting&)': standardprocessors.hpp:438: error: 'ICONV_SET_DISCARD_ILSEQ' was not declared in this scope standardprocessors.hpp:438: error: 'iconvctl' was not declared in this scope standardprocessors.hpp: In constructor 'WPCluebot::AllPropCharsetConverter::AllPropCharsetConverter(libconfig::Setting&)': standardprocessors.hpp:474: error: 'ICONV_SET_DISCARD_ILSEQ' was not declared in this scope standardprocessors.hpp:474: error: 'iconvctl' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [cluebotng] Error 1
It is code problem, libs problem?. Let me know please. (I'm using the last revison of cluebot). 201.236.134.109 ( talk) 00:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
I just noticed that User:ClueBot NG/Run wasn't protected, so anyone can come and shut CBNG off even if it's working properly. I think it should be full-protected so that only admins have access to it. Zero Talk Contribs 16:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
False positive reporting is down hence leaving it here. diff. Regards, SunCreator ( talk) 23:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The bot's adding almost every thing it goes through to my index. Something wrong with it? -- lTopGunl ( talk) 05:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
The bot's adding almost every thing it goes through to my index. Something wrong with it? -- lTopGunl ( talk) 05:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
There's a link to follow from the edit summary. Better leave them like this then I guess? Just 3 months, not a big deal unless there's another way. -- lTopGunl ( talk) 23:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
The BRFA says that ClueBot NG is exclusion compliant. Vandals could place {{ nobots}} on articles, to vandalise them a day later without the bot noticing. Is this intentional? → Σ τ c. 05:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
hat is the reason for the redirect to the page here when bot username is not ClueBot Commons? It would be more logical that the discussion had the same side as the bot. -- 80.161.143.239 ( talk) 14:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
The Review Interface recently seems to be in a state where it will repeat the same edit for review, multiple times, after I have already categorized it. Sometimes the repeat happens immediately, sometimes a few other edits come up before the repeat. Today the repeat was diff 404142727; a few days ago I had a similar experience where 416932352 kept coming up. Let me know if you need more info. Thanks. – Wdchk ( talk) 02:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Today, the review interface gives a internal server error. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.132.64.145 (
talk)
19:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Is the bot down? I archive weekly and keep a max of 10 threads. It has not archived on both conditions (was previously working with no change in other settings). -- lTopGunl ( talk) 22:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to report a false positive ID 773095, but I failed your captcha 8 times and gave up. I tried to log in, that did not work either -- I B d Shank ( Talk Talk) 21:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Good news! You can now access the report and review interfaces by heading to either http://review.cluebot.org or http://report.cluebot.org. Going to http://www.cluebot.org will lead to the CBNG's User page. Rich(MTCD) T| C| E-Mail 01:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
I got the Information about Season Six from Bruce Campbell. Bruce Campbell plays Sam Axe in Burn Notice. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthSeeker123 ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
HOW COULD YOU POSSIBLY TRACK DOWN MY EDIT SO FAST? HOW!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.89.149 ( talk) 03:17, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
The Review Interface recently seems to be in a state where it will repeat the same edit for review, multiple times, after I have already categorized it. Sometimes the repeat happens immediately, sometimes a few other edits come up before the repeat. Today, and on December 18, the repeat was diff 404142727; a few days previously I had a similar experience where 416932352 kept coming up. Let me know if you need more info. Thanks. (This thread was archived, but I reopened and updated it as the problem still exists.) – Wdchk ( talk) 23:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
This [1] user talk page history shows CBNG issuing a level-1, two others adding a level-2 and a level-3, CBNG adding a level-4, the vandal changing the talk page, and then CBNG issuing a level-2, all on the same day. If the warnings had been deleted by a registered editor other than the vandal I'd understand, but in this case it seems silly to scale back the last warning. Philip Trueman ( talk) 19:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
This is more of a minor issue. The bot did the following revert: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Saints_Row:_The_Third&diff=467267786&oldid=467267763 While this is a violation of WP:No_disclaimers_in_articles, it does not qualify as WP:Vandalism. Therefore, it might be more helpful for the corrected if the edit-comment of the bot indicates that a revert was for different reasons than vandalism. Technically, this is a false positive on vandalism, but I didn't want to report it as such as it would be quite unproductive to undo good reverts. Makrom ( talk) 07:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi hope this is the right place to ask for help. For the past week I and others have been reverting vandalism by 4.26.24.203 & 69.129.53.107 (I assume it's the same person) for Orko and Skeletor can we get some help? Tyros1972 ( talk) 00:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
OK thanks. Tyros1972 ( talk) 23:18, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
What does maxlag mean in the edit rate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramaksoud2000 ( talk • contribs) 01:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk: Ramaksoud2000/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=48|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes|minarchthreads=6}} That is my template. I don't know if the servers are down or something or my template is wrong but it is not archiving my talk page. I could archive it manually but it is cooler when a bot does it... :) I had to put letters in between the brackets for the template to show but I didn't put them on My talk page Ramaksoud2000 ( talk) 02:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi CBNG folks. Noticed there was a little down time in the past couple of days. When service was restored, it did not seem like the IRC feeds (or the entire IRC server) came back up. A lot of STiki users rely on these feeds, so it would be great if this could be fixed when you have the time. Ping me when it gets done, so I can verify the interfacing is going smoothly. Thanks, West.andrew.g ( talk) 04:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
To me, "Positive" meaning a Vandalism Detected (either False or True) is not an intuitive term. Of course this is, because I am not trained or working in this matter. So I need the mental step to construct the meaning. I'd suggest these terms be explained or described in the bot´s main (user accessible) page for the half-initiated ones like me. - DePiep ( talk) 22:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
There is repeating vandalism of people changing songs to "wuss songs". On Just When I Needed You Most ClueBotNG reverted it once in July, but after that left it again. Is "wuss" a word that can be added or something, or is their an other way such edits can be spotted by the bot? Thanks. Joost 99 ( talk) 11:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Well, first of all, http://report.cluebot.cluenet.org/ is not loading. Second of all, if it did load, it would require a revert ID, which ClueBot III (which points here) does not appear to generate.
ClueBot III archived an open RfC here, and this is annoying and took me 15 minutes to figure this out and undo and try to make the report and so forth, so this is not good. What the huge hurry is to clean talk pages of any but the most very recently active discussions I don't know, but at any rate open RfC's shouldn't be archived. It has an {{ rfc}} tag so maybe the bot could search for those. Herostratus ( talk) 15:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Could somebody please explain here? Rcsprinter (talk to me) 20:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey! Before taling to you i want to say to you: Good job with ClueBot NG!. Now, when I'm compiling cluebot (and i do have the required libs), make gives me this error:
In file included from main.cpp:9: standardprocessors.hpp: In constructor 'WPCluebot::CharsetConverter::CharsetConverter(libconfig::Setting&)': standardprocessors.hpp:438: error: 'ICONV_SET_DISCARD_ILSEQ' was not declared in this scope standardprocessors.hpp:438: error: 'iconvctl' was not declared in this scope standardprocessors.hpp: In constructor 'WPCluebot::AllPropCharsetConverter::AllPropCharsetConverter(libconfig::Setting&)': standardprocessors.hpp:474: error: 'ICONV_SET_DISCARD_ILSEQ' was not declared in this scope standardprocessors.hpp:474: error: 'iconvctl' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [cluebotng] Error 1
It is code problem, libs problem?. Let me know please. (I'm using the last revison of cluebot). 201.236.134.109 ( talk) 00:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
I just noticed that User:ClueBot NG/Run wasn't protected, so anyone can come and shut CBNG off even if it's working properly. I think it should be full-protected so that only admins have access to it. Zero Talk Contribs 16:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
False positive reporting is down hence leaving it here. diff. Regards, SunCreator ( talk) 23:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The bot's adding almost every thing it goes through to my index. Something wrong with it? -- lTopGunl ( talk) 05:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
The bot's adding almost every thing it goes through to my index. Something wrong with it? -- lTopGunl ( talk) 05:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
There's a link to follow from the edit summary. Better leave them like this then I guess? Just 3 months, not a big deal unless there's another way. -- lTopGunl ( talk) 23:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
The BRFA says that ClueBot NG is exclusion compliant. Vandals could place {{ nobots}} on articles, to vandalise them a day later without the bot noticing. Is this intentional? → Σ τ c. 05:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
hat is the reason for the redirect to the page here when bot username is not ClueBot Commons? It would be more logical that the discussion had the same side as the bot. -- 80.161.143.239 ( talk) 14:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
The Review Interface recently seems to be in a state where it will repeat the same edit for review, multiple times, after I have already categorized it. Sometimes the repeat happens immediately, sometimes a few other edits come up before the repeat. Today the repeat was diff 404142727; a few days ago I had a similar experience where 416932352 kept coming up. Let me know if you need more info. Thanks. – Wdchk ( talk) 02:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Today, the review interface gives a internal server error. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.132.64.145 (
talk)
19:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Is the bot down? I archive weekly and keep a max of 10 threads. It has not archived on both conditions (was previously working with no change in other settings). -- lTopGunl ( talk) 22:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to report a false positive ID 773095, but I failed your captcha 8 times and gave up. I tried to log in, that did not work either -- I B d Shank ( Talk Talk) 21:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Good news! You can now access the report and review interfaces by heading to either http://review.cluebot.org or http://report.cluebot.org. Going to http://www.cluebot.org will lead to the CBNG's User page. Rich(MTCD) T| C| E-Mail 01:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
I got the Information about Season Six from Bruce Campbell. Bruce Campbell plays Sam Axe in Burn Notice. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthSeeker123 ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
HOW COULD YOU POSSIBLY TRACK DOWN MY EDIT SO FAST? HOW!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.89.149 ( talk) 03:17, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
The Review Interface recently seems to be in a state where it will repeat the same edit for review, multiple times, after I have already categorized it. Sometimes the repeat happens immediately, sometimes a few other edits come up before the repeat. Today, and on December 18, the repeat was diff 404142727; a few days previously I had a similar experience where 416932352 kept coming up. Let me know if you need more info. Thanks. (This thread was archived, but I reopened and updated it as the problem still exists.) – Wdchk ( talk) 23:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
This [1] user talk page history shows CBNG issuing a level-1, two others adding a level-2 and a level-3, CBNG adding a level-4, the vandal changing the talk page, and then CBNG issuing a level-2, all on the same day. If the warnings had been deleted by a registered editor other than the vandal I'd understand, but in this case it seems silly to scale back the last warning. Philip Trueman ( talk) 19:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
This is more of a minor issue. The bot did the following revert: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Saints_Row:_The_Third&diff=467267786&oldid=467267763 While this is a violation of WP:No_disclaimers_in_articles, it does not qualify as WP:Vandalism. Therefore, it might be more helpful for the corrected if the edit-comment of the bot indicates that a revert was for different reasons than vandalism. Technically, this is a false positive on vandalism, but I didn't want to report it as such as it would be quite unproductive to undo good reverts. Makrom ( talk) 07:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi hope this is the right place to ask for help. For the past week I and others have been reverting vandalism by 4.26.24.203 & 69.129.53.107 (I assume it's the same person) for Orko and Skeletor can we get some help? Tyros1972 ( talk) 00:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
OK thanks. Tyros1972 ( talk) 23:18, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
What does maxlag mean in the edit rate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramaksoud2000 ( talk • contribs) 01:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk: Ramaksoud2000/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=48|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes|minarchthreads=6}} That is my template. I don't know if the servers are down or something or my template is wrong but it is not archiving my talk page. I could archive it manually but it is cooler when a bot does it... :) I had to put letters in between the brackets for the template to show but I didn't put them on My talk page Ramaksoud2000 ( talk) 02:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi CBNG folks. Noticed there was a little down time in the past couple of days. When service was restored, it did not seem like the IRC feeds (or the entire IRC server) came back up. A lot of STiki users rely on these feeds, so it would be great if this could be fixed when you have the time. Ping me when it gets done, so I can verify the interfacing is going smoothly. Thanks, West.andrew.g ( talk) 04:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
To me, "Positive" meaning a Vandalism Detected (either False or True) is not an intuitive term. Of course this is, because I am not trained or working in this matter. So I need the mental step to construct the meaning. I'd suggest these terms be explained or described in the bot´s main (user accessible) page for the half-initiated ones like me. - DePiep ( talk) 22:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)