This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'm still encountering the "Article not found" error that I mentioned on Winbots talk page. 24.6.65.83 05:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello bot owner, I hope you don't mind but I added more "bad words" and increased the sensitivity of the words in User:ClueBot/Source. Your bot is doing some very good work! 71.113.16.114 06:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
The bot seems to ignore edit conflicts. Check here. Owen× ☎ 16:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Still not working for IP addresses.
Article not found
This requires an editor to create an account for them to report False Positives.
-- 24.6.65.83 23:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed that rapid successions of edits tend to confuse Cluebot's vandalism report log. Here's what just happened (all times are local times):
This caused the following to appear on the bot's vandalism log:
Possible vandalism: Bull shark was changed by Kerkyt16 (c) (t) replacing content with 'Local Man found dead on bottom of teal lake after and apparent Shark attackA shark was planted in teal lake to eat little fish and make the lake good for peop...' on 2007-08-13T02:13:17+00:00 ClueBot 02:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Possible vandalism: Bull shark was changed by Kerkyt16 (c) (t) replacing content with 'Local Mann found dead on bottom of teal lake after and apparent Shark attackA shark was planted in teal lake to eat little fish and make the lake good for peop...' on 2007-08-13T02:13:59+00:00 ClueBot 02:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
The first edit was actually reverted by me. For the second edit, the bot thinks that it beat itself, which isn't possible! This is not a major issue, but you might want to look into this. -- Ixfd64 02:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason why there is a limit to the number of times the bot can revert an article per day? I don't think any of the other bots have this limitation and removing this limit (or at least raising it to something like 5) would help ClueBot remove more vandalism. Just a suggestion. Congrats on getting the bot approved, it has done a lot of work toward removing vandalism. :) -- Hdt83 Chat 05:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the block template. I think the Lupin tool got away from me a bit. — Wknight94 ( talk) 02:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello dear
i have seen you edit [ [1]],you did right beacuse he vandlized page,it was not your mistake.
Thanks
Khalidkhoso 13:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Maybe you'll add a timeout. Regards, — DerHexer (Talk) 17:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I need help. 2 articles I wrote : DAVID FEUERWERKER and LILIANE ACKERMANN have been repeatedly vandalized in the last 2-3 days by 74.105.77.91. When I revert to the original that individual repeats his vandalism. Is there any way to block that individual 74.105.77.91. Thanks. ( Highland14 16:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC))
I was just to create a single article for Richard Nixon's Head, and then redirect it from List of Recurring Human Characters.
I just wasn't quick enough, and I understand that change was reverted.
How do I do it to make the change and not damaging anything?? :)
DIRed14.2 16:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello Cluebot. You are fab. I would like to suggest or request that your edit summaries are changed to link to the contributions of the offender, in the same way that most other anti-vandalbots do. For example:
and
I don't know about others but I would find this very much more useful. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Is it possible for the bot to be changed to link to a user's contributions rather than their user page, particularly for IP addresses? This would make the bot a lot easier to follow and would make it consistent with other reverts on Wikipedia. Academic Challenger 05:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
This has been implemented. -- Cobi( t| c| b| cn) 07:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Is this something about the bv template? -- Chris G 10:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for dealing with vandalism, but in this case the bot inserted an extra <br> onto the talk page, which shoved the user warning farther down the page than it should have been, aside from being bad XHTML. Could you please recode the bot to not include that extra line break? Thanks! — Remember the dot ( talk) 04:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I noticed in the recent edit by this bot on Second Life, the bot did not flag its edit as being by a bot. Intentional or ommission? Rhialto 07:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
At the same time there was another atack from the same IP against the spanish article about Artur Balder in the spanish wikipedia, wich is full of realiable references waiting for translation. What can we do? Thanks-- Starwar25 23:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me will yopu please not revert my edit to child porn. I am reverting to an earlier version from last night, it was not vandalsim. Look on the talk page and you will see that the addition of material by another user is disputed so please do not involve yourself cluelessly in a content dispute. Pol64 18:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Your annoying me im trying to shorten the page, theres a message at the top of the page if you look —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.89.13 ( talk) 21:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
You need to add "tit", "tits", "asswipe", and "Republican" to your ClueBot list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.198.130 ( talk) 00:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I recommend to semi protect this article , because there are a lot of conspiracy theories about it on web . unfortunately, some misuse the right of anonymous article editing . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.240.240.17 ( talk) 16:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'm still encountering the "Article not found" error that I mentioned on Winbots talk page. 24.6.65.83 05:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello bot owner, I hope you don't mind but I added more "bad words" and increased the sensitivity of the words in User:ClueBot/Source. Your bot is doing some very good work! 71.113.16.114 06:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
The bot seems to ignore edit conflicts. Check here. Owen× ☎ 16:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Still not working for IP addresses.
Article not found
This requires an editor to create an account for them to report False Positives.
-- 24.6.65.83 23:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed that rapid successions of edits tend to confuse Cluebot's vandalism report log. Here's what just happened (all times are local times):
This caused the following to appear on the bot's vandalism log:
Possible vandalism: Bull shark was changed by Kerkyt16 (c) (t) replacing content with 'Local Man found dead on bottom of teal lake after and apparent Shark attackA shark was planted in teal lake to eat little fish and make the lake good for peop...' on 2007-08-13T02:13:17+00:00 ClueBot 02:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Possible vandalism: Bull shark was changed by Kerkyt16 (c) (t) replacing content with 'Local Mann found dead on bottom of teal lake after and apparent Shark attackA shark was planted in teal lake to eat little fish and make the lake good for peop...' on 2007-08-13T02:13:59+00:00 ClueBot 02:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
The first edit was actually reverted by me. For the second edit, the bot thinks that it beat itself, which isn't possible! This is not a major issue, but you might want to look into this. -- Ixfd64 02:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason why there is a limit to the number of times the bot can revert an article per day? I don't think any of the other bots have this limitation and removing this limit (or at least raising it to something like 5) would help ClueBot remove more vandalism. Just a suggestion. Congrats on getting the bot approved, it has done a lot of work toward removing vandalism. :) -- Hdt83 Chat 05:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the block template. I think the Lupin tool got away from me a bit. — Wknight94 ( talk) 02:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello dear
i have seen you edit [ [1]],you did right beacuse he vandlized page,it was not your mistake.
Thanks
Khalidkhoso 13:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Maybe you'll add a timeout. Regards, — DerHexer (Talk) 17:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I need help. 2 articles I wrote : DAVID FEUERWERKER and LILIANE ACKERMANN have been repeatedly vandalized in the last 2-3 days by 74.105.77.91. When I revert to the original that individual repeats his vandalism. Is there any way to block that individual 74.105.77.91. Thanks. ( Highland14 16:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC))
I was just to create a single article for Richard Nixon's Head, and then redirect it from List of Recurring Human Characters.
I just wasn't quick enough, and I understand that change was reverted.
How do I do it to make the change and not damaging anything?? :)
DIRed14.2 16:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello Cluebot. You are fab. I would like to suggest or request that your edit summaries are changed to link to the contributions of the offender, in the same way that most other anti-vandalbots do. For example:
and
I don't know about others but I would find this very much more useful. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Is it possible for the bot to be changed to link to a user's contributions rather than their user page, particularly for IP addresses? This would make the bot a lot easier to follow and would make it consistent with other reverts on Wikipedia. Academic Challenger 05:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
This has been implemented. -- Cobi( t| c| b| cn) 07:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Is this something about the bv template? -- Chris G 10:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for dealing with vandalism, but in this case the bot inserted an extra <br> onto the talk page, which shoved the user warning farther down the page than it should have been, aside from being bad XHTML. Could you please recode the bot to not include that extra line break? Thanks! — Remember the dot ( talk) 04:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I noticed in the recent edit by this bot on Second Life, the bot did not flag its edit as being by a bot. Intentional or ommission? Rhialto 07:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
At the same time there was another atack from the same IP against the spanish article about Artur Balder in the spanish wikipedia, wich is full of realiable references waiting for translation. What can we do? Thanks-- Starwar25 23:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me will yopu please not revert my edit to child porn. I am reverting to an earlier version from last night, it was not vandalsim. Look on the talk page and you will see that the addition of material by another user is disputed so please do not involve yourself cluelessly in a content dispute. Pol64 18:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Your annoying me im trying to shorten the page, theres a message at the top of the page if you look —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.89.13 ( talk) 21:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
You need to add "tit", "tits", "asswipe", and "Republican" to your ClueBot list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.198.130 ( talk) 00:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I recommend to semi protect this article , because there are a lot of conspiracy theories about it on web . unfortunately, some misuse the right of anonymous article editing . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.240.240.17 ( talk) 16:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)