Wikipedia guidelines dictate that you assume good faith in dealing with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors, and assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Thank you. BhaiSaab talk 20:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
More edit warring on multiple articles, after your previous week-long block and many, many bocks before. I'm reblocking for two weeks this time. You must stop edit warring if you want to continue editing at Wikipedia. Dmcdevit· t 20:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
CltFn ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was reverting on a living bio , to remove unsubstantiated , POV motivated material and per the biography tag the 3 RR does not apply
Decline reason:
Okay, first of all, your extreme history of edit warring has set you up for this 2 week block. Stop now, seriously. Do not edit war. You can be blocked permanently if you exhaust the community's patience and you are on your way. Second, even after over a dozen blocks you have violated the WP:3RR again. You KNOW it's against the rules, yet you still do it. Furthermore, you were not reverting vandalism, you were edit warring. Shape up. Reverting is very unhelpful to the editing process. Mango juice talk 15:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note to the reviewing admin.
CltFn ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have been advised by admin netsnipe to file a second unblock request
Decline reason:
Given the apparent determination to continue the edit war and CltFn's refusal to accept that there is any problem with his actions, a block is self-evidently warranted. The history at [1] clearly shows that CltFn is under the wholly mistaken impression that revert warring is an acceptable way to pursue a content dispute despite previous warnings and blocks. WP:BLP does not apply in this case as the claim that Winn is self-published is backed by reliable sources. CltFn also reinserted a huge block of external links, depracated by the link guideline. CltFn also appears to perceive his own biases as neutral and shows all the signs of being a tendentious editor; an enforced break to cool off seems eminently sensible. Guy 10:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
"He openly admits that this is what he is doing see talk page above."
Is she dead? BhaiSaab talk 05:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I saw nothing on the site that says that they are anything but copyrighted. That means (unless you can get them to somehow release the images as free which I doubt will happen) you can only use them under fair use. That means you could read over WP:FUC. Sadly, I doubt they can be used because they aren't even really promotional pictures since they are released by the university for the event. I also don't think we can stretch it to historic event (like the copyright tag used for Image:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg) because... well, it appears that there were four people praying with her and what Amina Wadud did got far more press. I doubt there is much that can be used from there... but, there is probably some place (maybe on the FUC talk page) that you can ask more knowledgeable people.
I'll take a look at that AfD ... but, I'm not sure if I'll weigh in, yet. gren グレン 10:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
You might be too young to get the cultural ref but I just thought you might like a few kind words. I certainly am seeing a pattern here in the way contributors are treated. Clearly some points of view are more equal than others. Hang in there. AnneCr 02:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the Bat Yeor article, please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bat_Ye%27or#Thomas_Jones_Review. Tidaress 09:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Please don't remove the criticisms of Spencer -- Aminz 09:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I have afd'd your article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti Dhimmitude. Peace. -- Striver 10:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
You don't know me, but I have noticed that you have had troubles with User:BhaiSaab in the past.He has filed an RfA against me:
Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#User:Hkelkar
And the question of his extreme partisanship has been raised by an admin.If you would like to contribute to that page then please do. Thanks. Hkelkar 00:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I had deleted that page, but some other users did not agree to it; so I undeleted it again. Please proceed with an MfD for that page and put up all the evidence of solicitation, and notify me on my talk page. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 15:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from renaming pages by cutting and pasting their content into a new place. There is a move tab available for you to use, and using it moves the edit history of the article to the new name. If a page cannot be moved, please use WP:RFPM or ask an administrator. It is also a good idea to wait for consensus before moving pages. Thanks. JD talk 12:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:RobertSpencer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 23:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 12:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Srdja.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 21:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia guidelines dictate that you assume good faith in dealing with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors, and assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Thank you. BhaiSaab talk 20:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
More edit warring on multiple articles, after your previous week-long block and many, many bocks before. I'm reblocking for two weeks this time. You must stop edit warring if you want to continue editing at Wikipedia. Dmcdevit· t 20:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
CltFn ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was reverting on a living bio , to remove unsubstantiated , POV motivated material and per the biography tag the 3 RR does not apply
Decline reason:
Okay, first of all, your extreme history of edit warring has set you up for this 2 week block. Stop now, seriously. Do not edit war. You can be blocked permanently if you exhaust the community's patience and you are on your way. Second, even after over a dozen blocks you have violated the WP:3RR again. You KNOW it's against the rules, yet you still do it. Furthermore, you were not reverting vandalism, you were edit warring. Shape up. Reverting is very unhelpful to the editing process. Mango juice talk 15:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note to the reviewing admin.
CltFn ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have been advised by admin netsnipe to file a second unblock request
Decline reason:
Given the apparent determination to continue the edit war and CltFn's refusal to accept that there is any problem with his actions, a block is self-evidently warranted. The history at [1] clearly shows that CltFn is under the wholly mistaken impression that revert warring is an acceptable way to pursue a content dispute despite previous warnings and blocks. WP:BLP does not apply in this case as the claim that Winn is self-published is backed by reliable sources. CltFn also reinserted a huge block of external links, depracated by the link guideline. CltFn also appears to perceive his own biases as neutral and shows all the signs of being a tendentious editor; an enforced break to cool off seems eminently sensible. Guy 10:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
"He openly admits that this is what he is doing see talk page above."
Is she dead? BhaiSaab talk 05:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I saw nothing on the site that says that they are anything but copyrighted. That means (unless you can get them to somehow release the images as free which I doubt will happen) you can only use them under fair use. That means you could read over WP:FUC. Sadly, I doubt they can be used because they aren't even really promotional pictures since they are released by the university for the event. I also don't think we can stretch it to historic event (like the copyright tag used for Image:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg) because... well, it appears that there were four people praying with her and what Amina Wadud did got far more press. I doubt there is much that can be used from there... but, there is probably some place (maybe on the FUC talk page) that you can ask more knowledgeable people.
I'll take a look at that AfD ... but, I'm not sure if I'll weigh in, yet. gren グレン 10:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
You might be too young to get the cultural ref but I just thought you might like a few kind words. I certainly am seeing a pattern here in the way contributors are treated. Clearly some points of view are more equal than others. Hang in there. AnneCr 02:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the Bat Yeor article, please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bat_Ye%27or#Thomas_Jones_Review. Tidaress 09:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Please don't remove the criticisms of Spencer -- Aminz 09:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I have afd'd your article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti Dhimmitude. Peace. -- Striver 10:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
You don't know me, but I have noticed that you have had troubles with User:BhaiSaab in the past.He has filed an RfA against me:
Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#User:Hkelkar
And the question of his extreme partisanship has been raised by an admin.If you would like to contribute to that page then please do. Thanks. Hkelkar 00:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I had deleted that page, but some other users did not agree to it; so I undeleted it again. Please proceed with an MfD for that page and put up all the evidence of solicitation, and notify me on my talk page. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 15:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from renaming pages by cutting and pasting their content into a new place. There is a move tab available for you to use, and using it moves the edit history of the article to the new name. If a page cannot be moved, please use WP:RFPM or ask an administrator. It is also a good idea to wait for consensus before moving pages. Thanks. JD talk 12:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:RobertSpencer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 23:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 12:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Srdja.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 21:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)