Hello, Cj67, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. -- CTSWyneken 23:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)( talk)
Welcome to to the organized chaos that is Wikipedia. Kindly be advised that your edits to speed of gravity have been reverted for the reasons described on talk:speed of gravity. Kindly feel free to read the prior discussions and to weigh in on the issue of mentioning TVF in that article. You will not be permitted to unilaterally remove that content, but I am happy to listen to your reasons for wanting it removed. Given a good case that myself and another editor can comfortably get behind and defend, that mention will become history. -- EMS | Talk 03:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
so this is the place you said right?
His proof, which was a very very hasty sketch went along these lines :
let f be
he said, consider the functions
now convolve :
if goes to zero, it is known that becomes an approximation of unity under convolving that should give the result
But is this really okay? Doesn't convolving require the function to be defined everywhere at first?
Thanks, Evilbu 18:18, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Lebesgue spaces can be defined on any measure space. A Lebesgue space on a measure space S with counting measure is the space . In the case that S = N, the set of natural numbers, the standard space is obtained. In the case that S = n, the set with n elements, the space Rn with its p-norm is obtained. - lethe talk + 09:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Just a reminder, it is good if you use an edit summary when you contribute, it helps others understand what you change. Thanks. You can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 20:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
The preview button is a good thing too. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I am sure you know about these things more than me, but are you sure about the phrase:
Why is "loc" there? Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 20:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Check this out: [1] bunix 02:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, didn't you see South Park? We're all atheists now. Hail Science! — coelacan talk — 03:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Dear Cj,
Please provide edit summaries on Religion that describe the neutral reason for the edit and not ones like "remove silly fluff". I reverted your recent change because "way of life" however ambiguous you may think it sounds is a very common comparative descriptor of religion. Perhaps there are other reasons for making the change you made, but calling this "silly fluff" is wholly unproductive. PelleSmith 21:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Cj67. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Cj67, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. -- CTSWyneken 23:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)( talk)
Welcome to to the organized chaos that is Wikipedia. Kindly be advised that your edits to speed of gravity have been reverted for the reasons described on talk:speed of gravity. Kindly feel free to read the prior discussions and to weigh in on the issue of mentioning TVF in that article. You will not be permitted to unilaterally remove that content, but I am happy to listen to your reasons for wanting it removed. Given a good case that myself and another editor can comfortably get behind and defend, that mention will become history. -- EMS | Talk 03:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
so this is the place you said right?
His proof, which was a very very hasty sketch went along these lines :
let f be
he said, consider the functions
now convolve :
if goes to zero, it is known that becomes an approximation of unity under convolving that should give the result
But is this really okay? Doesn't convolving require the function to be defined everywhere at first?
Thanks, Evilbu 18:18, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Lebesgue spaces can be defined on any measure space. A Lebesgue space on a measure space S with counting measure is the space . In the case that S = N, the set of natural numbers, the standard space is obtained. In the case that S = n, the set with n elements, the space Rn with its p-norm is obtained. - lethe talk + 09:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Just a reminder, it is good if you use an edit summary when you contribute, it helps others understand what you change. Thanks. You can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 20:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
The preview button is a good thing too. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I am sure you know about these things more than me, but are you sure about the phrase:
Why is "loc" there? Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 20:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Check this out: [1] bunix 02:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, didn't you see South Park? We're all atheists now. Hail Science! — coelacan talk — 03:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Dear Cj,
Please provide edit summaries on Religion that describe the neutral reason for the edit and not ones like "remove silly fluff". I reverted your recent change because "way of life" however ambiguous you may think it sounds is a very common comparative descriptor of religion. Perhaps there are other reasons for making the change you made, but calling this "silly fluff" is wholly unproductive. PelleSmith 21:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Cj67. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)