This is Citizen Canine's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
![]() |
Hello, Citizen Canine!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk) 09:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
|
Thanks for correcting my misspelling of misspelling! What an error to make. Good eye! Enwebb ( talk) 22:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Why did you revert my last edition ? I see you never edited any similar page and you're pretty new at Wikipedia. May I ask why this change and what's wrong about using these flairs where they belong? -- TechnicianGB ( talk) 15:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
It's not a clear policy, it is a recommendation. Since most cities from the world and Europe have it, Vitoria should have it as well, and I can't find why no one wouldn't be ok with it except for political ideologies. No, i'm aware i'm being completely neutral, since I added the official flairs which belong and represent the city of Vitoria-Gasteiz removing them shows a kind of aversion to the reality as Vitoria is a Spanish city in the Basque Country region, so flairs should be left there to show additional info. Unless if you want to edit thousands of cities worldwide to remove all of their flairs, I don't see why Vitoria should be exclusively removed within it's flairs?
I added these flairs some months ago and they were there until an anonymous user deleted them for no reason. It's a pity I didn't notice these changes until yesterday, if not, nothing of this would have happened.
I wasn't either trying to undermine your changes because you are new, I just said that because seeing your edition history, most of your edits are petty editions and you never edited nothing related to Vitoria or Spain. Your editions and writing style remind me of an user I reported last month doing very similar edits, who later got banned as he was a sockpuppet of a master banned account. For a moment, it was like a flashback for me, since after not editing any similar article, you appeared on one where I was engaged in a discussion. Anyways, I'm not blaming you for nothing, just saying it's curious. Maybe I am just a little paranoid since I had to deal with lots of clones from that user. Btw, welcome to the Wikipedia and have a nice day! -- TechnicianGB ( talk) 16:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Citizen Canine. Thanks for the input on the article. However, the linked names are not section headings but sub-heading within section headings which is different. As per /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_be_linked "another article that will help readers understand the article more fully (see the example below). This can include people, events, and topics that already have an article or that clearly deserve one, so long as the link is relevant to the article in question".
Linking this sub-heading names of people and event help readers understand the article better and improves its presention as well. Putting them on a See Also section does not apply since they are interconnected and relevant to the article itself and a See Main article clouds the presentation of the article with excessive repetition and does not make the article presentable. AeroCap ( talk) 10:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
I disagree that sub-sections are section headings and cannot be linked. The article had good presentation the way it was and was easier to read pointing out the most notable person and events clearly through the linked sub-sectioned names and events.
I will take away the duplicated linked names in the main text and leave the subsections linked to make the most notable members and events highlighted AeroCap ( talk) 11:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi again Citizen Canine. As per /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Section_headings "Headings should normally not contain links, especially where only part of a heading is linked" I think an exception can be made in this case since the guideline doesnt say a sub-section should NEVER but NORMALLY shouldnt be linked.
I think in this case an exception can be made since adding various See Main Article under various sub-headings within heading sections doesnt look presentable on this article which contains a high number of sub-headings. For simplicity, efficiency and ease of reading I believe an exception should be made here. AeroCap ( talk) 14:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Understood. Thanks for the input AeroCap ( talk) 14:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Citizen Canine. Thanks for the input on the article. However the information being removed/edited is not public information (check the source) and was taken off the public record given the dangers this posed to Kendra's family. The removed information has no effect on the article. J. Hafke Esq. (Attorney for Kendra Lust) Jhafke ( talk) 14:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhafke ( talk • contribs) 11:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
The edit was originally made on air by Norm Hitzges himself, on broadcast radio to millions of people. I have reverted it back after the edit trolls like yourself have been reverting it. I'm reverting to his edit, he can edit his own Wikipedia page if he likes, he is adding information to himself, he is a first party source being himself. I am making sure his own edits stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.96.192.210 ( talk) 16:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cirsoid aneurysm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Excision ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Citizen Canine! I've removed your tag from Misogyny and mass media because there wasn't an accompanying discussion at Talk:Misogyny and mass media. Feel free to add the tag again after you've started a discussion stating how the article violates WP:NPOV. If you have any questions, please let me know! Cheers! Woodroar ( talk) 23:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Citizen Canine. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The world's hardest logic puzzle, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Jamez42 ( talk) 02:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anil Gupta (philosopher), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarski's theorem ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Euphoria (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Buongiorno da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai, io sto abbastanza bene per ora. Volevo chiederti una cortesia se puoi aiutarmi, quella cioè di ampliare, rimodellando la formula in inglese, la biografia di Lori Jo Hendrix, la quale ho visto che hai partecipato qualche mese fa. Io ho trovato una biografia extra Wikipedia: eccola qui e anche questa qua, che sono più o meno simili, naturalmente se posso fare qualcosa per te sono a tua completa disposizione. un caro saluto dalla Calabria-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 11:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Buongiorno di nuovo, allora facciamo così, proverò a cercare quel poco di materiale che posso arrangiare, eventualmente scrivo alla diretta interessata come ho intenzione di fare, mi farò mandare qualche stralcio di biografia. Data la tua gentilezza e la conoscenza del tedesco e della mia lingua ti segnalo anche un articolo finito in draft: Draft:Nike Fuhrmann, se per cortesia potresti ampliarlo tu un po'. grazie mille per la tua disponibilità! Se posso fare qualcosa per te non esitare a chiederlo. cordialmente-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 12:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OMG and WTF ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Buongiorno da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai. Io sto abbastanza per ora, preparandomi per andare a messa. Ti scrivo per chiederti un favore, quello cioè di dare un aiuto alle fonti di questi primi articoli su Coreca, le fonti sono presenti su Wikipedia in francese e tedesco, ti chiedo la cortesia di dare una mano alle voci, anche una leggera traduzione in inglese. Per quanto riguarda Fanny Cadeo, una miglioria generale qua e là. Naturalmente se posso fare qualcosa per te chiedimi pure. un caro saluto e a presto, grazie ancora per quello che hai fatto, fai e farai per me.-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 08:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Buongiorno di nuovo, Mi spiego meglio, ho intenzione di farli migliorare e tradurre in russo, polacco e altre lingue, ma necessitano di una miglioria qua e là, se tu potresti aggiungere le fonti in inglese dalle lingue che ti ho sottolineato te ne sarò infinitamente grato. Se ti occorre tempo fai pure. un caro saluto e grazie mille per la stima e aiuto-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 11:34, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Buonasera da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai, oltre a questo per chiederti un aiuto e supporto grammaticale per quanto concerne l'articolo che ho creato pochi minuti fa, sono un po' intontito dalla stanchezza, perciò mi affido alle tue sagge e amorevoli mano, quello che ti chiedo è di dedicare appena puoi 10 minuti del tuo prezioso tempo, per dare una forma più inglese e un senso logico alle frasi, naturalmente se posso fare qualcosa per te chiedimi pure. un caro saluto e a presto!-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 21:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kennel (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gutter ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about this – that was unintentional. Thanks to Gogo Dodo for pointing out my mistake. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Buonasera da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e ringraziarti di quello che stai facendo per me, ho chiesto aiuto a mezzo mondo per aiutare questa biografia, stamane prima di partire ho inserito la biografia che è presente su Imdb, con un po' di casini, ti chiedo per favore se puoi rimpastare l'articolo secondo i canoni, almeno dando una biografia mezza decente. Io non sono tanto bravo in inglese ancora, sto riprendendo gli studi anche in inglese in questi giorni. spero mi aiuterai o in alternativa, la facciamo tornare alla versione precedente. grazie per tutto e a presto!-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 18:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Wall-of-text
|
---|
Hi Citizen Canine, Why did you block the changes that I made on Wikipedias page about the Catholic Church and then write, "Not seeing any consensus for these changes, just one troublesome user who keeps pushing his POV to suit his ideology?" Did you not see the fifty sources that I cited? Did you not read /info/en/?search=Talk:History_of_the_Catholic_Church ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.204.252 ( talk) 11:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The record shows (hint: re-read your own words) that I never stated that this is what the church believes about itself. My contention has always been that this is what history shows. (don't worry; we'll get there. For some I have to go slower than I would like to, so that they are able to follow along and understand) You said, "But as mentioned, all it tells us is what the Church believes about itself." .....WRONG So once again, Where does this statement suggest that this, "is what the Church believes about itself?" Nowhere does it state that this is what the church believes about itself. the onus is now on you to demonstrate how this passage shows, "what the church believes about itself" or you can admit that you made an error when you made the statement, "But as mentioned, all it tells us is what the Church believes about itself." and then retract your statement so that we can move on. 72.208.204.252 ( talk) 13:27, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
"Tradition" is, by the definition employed here on Wikipedia, "a belief or behavior passed down within a group or society with symbolic meaning or special significance with origins in the past." So the phrase "according to tradition" makes a rather important difference to the meaning. 50 sources seems a little overkill when 5 would have done. You threatened to go through them one-by-one challenging me to show how they do not support the proposed changes, as opposed to it being your responsibility to show that they do. To avoid the bother I suggested that you "go ahead and make those changes again" (I wonder if this wasn't your intention?). I did not mean that I agreed with those changes, I apologise if you were led to that conclusion. Citizen Canine (talk) 06:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. The beginning of the article reads, "According to tradition, the history of the Catholic Church begins with Jesus Christ and his teachings (c. 4 BC – c. AD 30) and the Catholic Church is a continuation of the early Christian community established by Jesus."
"Tradition" is, by the definition employed here on Wikipedia, "a belief or behavior passed down within a group or society with symbolic meaning or special significance with origins in the past." So the phrase "according to tradition" makes a rather important difference to the meaning. 50 sources seems a little overkill when 5 would have done. You threatened to go through them one-by-one challenging me to show how they do not support the proposed changes, as opposed to it being your responsibility to show that they do. To avoid the bother I suggested that you "go ahead and make those changes again" (I wonder if this wasn't your intention?). I did not mean that I agreed with those changes, I apologise if you were led to that conclusion. Citizen Canine (talk) 06:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
If the preposition "according to tradition" is absolutely necessary, and apparently it is because each time I tried to delete it someone put it back; then wouldn't it be the responsibility of those who required the preposition to be a part of the sentence in the first place, to document and provide sources that show why this preposition is absolutely necessary in this sentence? Further, how should we go about explaining away what the second paragraph of the "Tradition" article states about tradition in bold letters?
Indeed, it was my intention to,"go ahead and make those changes again", immediately following our dialogue. Unfortunately, because of Wikipedia's WP:EDITWAR policy I was forced to wait the time stipulated in the policy to make the changes. While waiting, I was threatened and bullied not to make the changes (please see /info/en/?search=User_talk:Ad_Orientem). As a result, I will continue my dialogue with the hopes that you, or someone else reading this, will make the changes on my behalf. Additionally, and for the time being, I would accept Zenadix's compromise at the beginning of this thread, "I agree that the original wording is preferable, and would support reverting back to it. Alternatively, a compromise solution would be to change it to something like "The Catholic Church is a continuation of the early Christian community established by Jesus Christ" or "The Catholic Church traces its history to Jesus Christ and the Apostles", which could potentially satisfy everyone. — Zenadix (talk) 05:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)."
|
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam ( talk) 10:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The point you make doesn't really stack up. Of course someone who can speak German and French is multilingual and it's so obvious that it adds nothing as an example. On the other hand, to claim a multilingual ability for AmE and BrE is nothing short of a lie, and so it isn't a weasel word/phrase - it's an untruth, as claims involving any other language variants would be (e.g. Canadian-French and 'French-French'). The numeric examples are good, and really they are all that's needed. "You say you are multilingual? Great. How many languages is that"? 31.52.166.114 ( talk) 19:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for watching over Momo Challenge and repeatedly reverting vandalism. I've put significant efforts in getting this page right, separating facts from hysteria, but none of that means anything if vandals shred the page with stupid comments. Cheers (raising my glass of lemonade to you)! Robincantin ( talk) 20:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping the ship afloat! See User:Jim1138/Single use IP for a list of articles that I put together. I asked Oshwah for advice user talk:Oshwah#Anon removing content Cheers Jim1138 talk 11:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Was Christopher Robin a bomb? 66.31.161.101 ( talk) 00:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Citizen Canine. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Citizen Canine. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi I removed the image because this is not good practice of dog hydrotherapy, in fact its very low standard. I wasn't able to insert a new image as I had to wait for my profile to be validated
There are great standards and codes of practice in the UK. National Association of canine hydrotherapists, of which I am the chair man.
I will remove the image again and leave a not/edit
Thanks
Adam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.139.10.58 ( talk) 12:38, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. This kind of tangles are generally very silly, but I do not think I've had met a sillier one than this. 80.182.219.166 ( talk) 19:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Buon Pomeriggio da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai, io sto abbastanza been per ora. Ti scrivo inoltre per chiederti un piccolo aiuto a livello grammaticale su un articolo che ho creato poco fa, riguardante un'attrice italiana. Claudia Letizia, mi chiedevo se potresti dedicarci 3 minuti del tuo prezioso tempo, qui l'articolo che ho dovuto abbozzare, e che non è andato bene agli amministratori italofoni, ti chiedo la cortesia di dedicarci un po' di tempo per migliorarlo in inglese, eventualmente al resto penserò io. per adesso grazie mille e buon pomeriggio ancora-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 14:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Buonasera, in italiano ancora non c'è per ora, a Dio piacendo non tarderà ad arrivare. Per quanto riguarda two seasons riguarda ambodue le stagioni, Se mi potresti dare un ulteriore mano te ne sarei infinitamente grato. un caro saluto da Coreca-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 18:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
Hello Citizen Canine, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
If the photo is not Jeanne, the subject of the article, and the caption refers to a mistake by no one who you can identify, (ie not the book it is reffed to) then what is the justification for having the photo there with any caption, especially one that does not say who made the mistake or what its relevance to acceptance of Calment's longevity claim is, eh? I think you have explained why the picture should be removed entirely. Overagainst ( talk) 20:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavery and religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islam and slavery ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
for ur hard work
ImmortalWizard
(chat) 13:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— ZuiTube—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mrwoogi010 ✉ 17:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the silly mistake in the title of Giovanni Gonnelli. I tried to fixed this a long time ago, but without success. Leo Uroboros ( talk) 20:40, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
It's amazing how we even need to argue over something like this. Keep at it. Syopsis ( talk) 16:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Could you please leave the hidden comment in place. Reverts should only be used for blatant vandalism etc. Otherwise you should use the talk page for consensus. As per the talk page, we are trying to minimise WP:recentism. It's a thing. Mozzie ( talk) 17:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
If you see a good-faith edit which you feel does not improve the article, make a good-faith effort to reword instead of reverting it. Similarly, if you make an edit which is good-faith reverted, do not simply reinstate your edit – leave the status quo up, or try an alternative way to make the change that includes feedback from the other editor.
See Talk:New_Zealand#Elizabeth_1_or_2 Ross Finlayson ( talk) 23:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
At talk TPG I agree a better short cut is a good idea. However, I noted criticisms of OTHERTALK and suggested an alternative phrasing. I look forward to your thoughts about the other wording and if that will work for you. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 15:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for the assistance at Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. Shellwood ( talk) 23:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
This is Citizen Canine's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
![]() |
Hello, Citizen Canine!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk) 09:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
|
Thanks for correcting my misspelling of misspelling! What an error to make. Good eye! Enwebb ( talk) 22:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Why did you revert my last edition ? I see you never edited any similar page and you're pretty new at Wikipedia. May I ask why this change and what's wrong about using these flairs where they belong? -- TechnicianGB ( talk) 15:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
It's not a clear policy, it is a recommendation. Since most cities from the world and Europe have it, Vitoria should have it as well, and I can't find why no one wouldn't be ok with it except for political ideologies. No, i'm aware i'm being completely neutral, since I added the official flairs which belong and represent the city of Vitoria-Gasteiz removing them shows a kind of aversion to the reality as Vitoria is a Spanish city in the Basque Country region, so flairs should be left there to show additional info. Unless if you want to edit thousands of cities worldwide to remove all of their flairs, I don't see why Vitoria should be exclusively removed within it's flairs?
I added these flairs some months ago and they were there until an anonymous user deleted them for no reason. It's a pity I didn't notice these changes until yesterday, if not, nothing of this would have happened.
I wasn't either trying to undermine your changes because you are new, I just said that because seeing your edition history, most of your edits are petty editions and you never edited nothing related to Vitoria or Spain. Your editions and writing style remind me of an user I reported last month doing very similar edits, who later got banned as he was a sockpuppet of a master banned account. For a moment, it was like a flashback for me, since after not editing any similar article, you appeared on one where I was engaged in a discussion. Anyways, I'm not blaming you for nothing, just saying it's curious. Maybe I am just a little paranoid since I had to deal with lots of clones from that user. Btw, welcome to the Wikipedia and have a nice day! -- TechnicianGB ( talk) 16:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Citizen Canine. Thanks for the input on the article. However, the linked names are not section headings but sub-heading within section headings which is different. As per /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_be_linked "another article that will help readers understand the article more fully (see the example below). This can include people, events, and topics that already have an article or that clearly deserve one, so long as the link is relevant to the article in question".
Linking this sub-heading names of people and event help readers understand the article better and improves its presention as well. Putting them on a See Also section does not apply since they are interconnected and relevant to the article itself and a See Main article clouds the presentation of the article with excessive repetition and does not make the article presentable. AeroCap ( talk) 10:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
I disagree that sub-sections are section headings and cannot be linked. The article had good presentation the way it was and was easier to read pointing out the most notable person and events clearly through the linked sub-sectioned names and events.
I will take away the duplicated linked names in the main text and leave the subsections linked to make the most notable members and events highlighted AeroCap ( talk) 11:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi again Citizen Canine. As per /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Section_headings "Headings should normally not contain links, especially where only part of a heading is linked" I think an exception can be made in this case since the guideline doesnt say a sub-section should NEVER but NORMALLY shouldnt be linked.
I think in this case an exception can be made since adding various See Main Article under various sub-headings within heading sections doesnt look presentable on this article which contains a high number of sub-headings. For simplicity, efficiency and ease of reading I believe an exception should be made here. AeroCap ( talk) 14:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Understood. Thanks for the input AeroCap ( talk) 14:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Citizen Canine. Thanks for the input on the article. However the information being removed/edited is not public information (check the source) and was taken off the public record given the dangers this posed to Kendra's family. The removed information has no effect on the article. J. Hafke Esq. (Attorney for Kendra Lust) Jhafke ( talk) 14:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhafke ( talk • contribs) 11:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
The edit was originally made on air by Norm Hitzges himself, on broadcast radio to millions of people. I have reverted it back after the edit trolls like yourself have been reverting it. I'm reverting to his edit, he can edit his own Wikipedia page if he likes, he is adding information to himself, he is a first party source being himself. I am making sure his own edits stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.96.192.210 ( talk) 16:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cirsoid aneurysm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Excision ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Citizen Canine! I've removed your tag from Misogyny and mass media because there wasn't an accompanying discussion at Talk:Misogyny and mass media. Feel free to add the tag again after you've started a discussion stating how the article violates WP:NPOV. If you have any questions, please let me know! Cheers! Woodroar ( talk) 23:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Citizen Canine. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The world's hardest logic puzzle, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Jamez42 ( talk) 02:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anil Gupta (philosopher), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarski's theorem ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Euphoria (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Buongiorno da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai, io sto abbastanza bene per ora. Volevo chiederti una cortesia se puoi aiutarmi, quella cioè di ampliare, rimodellando la formula in inglese, la biografia di Lori Jo Hendrix, la quale ho visto che hai partecipato qualche mese fa. Io ho trovato una biografia extra Wikipedia: eccola qui e anche questa qua, che sono più o meno simili, naturalmente se posso fare qualcosa per te sono a tua completa disposizione. un caro saluto dalla Calabria-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 11:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Buongiorno di nuovo, allora facciamo così, proverò a cercare quel poco di materiale che posso arrangiare, eventualmente scrivo alla diretta interessata come ho intenzione di fare, mi farò mandare qualche stralcio di biografia. Data la tua gentilezza e la conoscenza del tedesco e della mia lingua ti segnalo anche un articolo finito in draft: Draft:Nike Fuhrmann, se per cortesia potresti ampliarlo tu un po'. grazie mille per la tua disponibilità! Se posso fare qualcosa per te non esitare a chiederlo. cordialmente-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 12:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OMG and WTF ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Buongiorno da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai. Io sto abbastanza per ora, preparandomi per andare a messa. Ti scrivo per chiederti un favore, quello cioè di dare un aiuto alle fonti di questi primi articoli su Coreca, le fonti sono presenti su Wikipedia in francese e tedesco, ti chiedo la cortesia di dare una mano alle voci, anche una leggera traduzione in inglese. Per quanto riguarda Fanny Cadeo, una miglioria generale qua e là. Naturalmente se posso fare qualcosa per te chiedimi pure. un caro saluto e a presto, grazie ancora per quello che hai fatto, fai e farai per me.-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 08:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Buongiorno di nuovo, Mi spiego meglio, ho intenzione di farli migliorare e tradurre in russo, polacco e altre lingue, ma necessitano di una miglioria qua e là, se tu potresti aggiungere le fonti in inglese dalle lingue che ti ho sottolineato te ne sarò infinitamente grato. Se ti occorre tempo fai pure. un caro saluto e grazie mille per la stima e aiuto-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 11:34, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Buonasera da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai, oltre a questo per chiederti un aiuto e supporto grammaticale per quanto concerne l'articolo che ho creato pochi minuti fa, sono un po' intontito dalla stanchezza, perciò mi affido alle tue sagge e amorevoli mano, quello che ti chiedo è di dedicare appena puoi 10 minuti del tuo prezioso tempo, per dare una forma più inglese e un senso logico alle frasi, naturalmente se posso fare qualcosa per te chiedimi pure. un caro saluto e a presto!-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 21:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kennel (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gutter ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about this – that was unintentional. Thanks to Gogo Dodo for pointing out my mistake. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Buonasera da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e ringraziarti di quello che stai facendo per me, ho chiesto aiuto a mezzo mondo per aiutare questa biografia, stamane prima di partire ho inserito la biografia che è presente su Imdb, con un po' di casini, ti chiedo per favore se puoi rimpastare l'articolo secondo i canoni, almeno dando una biografia mezza decente. Io non sono tanto bravo in inglese ancora, sto riprendendo gli studi anche in inglese in questi giorni. spero mi aiuterai o in alternativa, la facciamo tornare alla versione precedente. grazie per tutto e a presto!-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 18:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Wall-of-text
|
---|
Hi Citizen Canine, Why did you block the changes that I made on Wikipedias page about the Catholic Church and then write, "Not seeing any consensus for these changes, just one troublesome user who keeps pushing his POV to suit his ideology?" Did you not see the fifty sources that I cited? Did you not read /info/en/?search=Talk:History_of_the_Catholic_Church ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.204.252 ( talk) 11:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The record shows (hint: re-read your own words) that I never stated that this is what the church believes about itself. My contention has always been that this is what history shows. (don't worry; we'll get there. For some I have to go slower than I would like to, so that they are able to follow along and understand) You said, "But as mentioned, all it tells us is what the Church believes about itself." .....WRONG So once again, Where does this statement suggest that this, "is what the Church believes about itself?" Nowhere does it state that this is what the church believes about itself. the onus is now on you to demonstrate how this passage shows, "what the church believes about itself" or you can admit that you made an error when you made the statement, "But as mentioned, all it tells us is what the Church believes about itself." and then retract your statement so that we can move on. 72.208.204.252 ( talk) 13:27, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
"Tradition" is, by the definition employed here on Wikipedia, "a belief or behavior passed down within a group or society with symbolic meaning or special significance with origins in the past." So the phrase "according to tradition" makes a rather important difference to the meaning. 50 sources seems a little overkill when 5 would have done. You threatened to go through them one-by-one challenging me to show how they do not support the proposed changes, as opposed to it being your responsibility to show that they do. To avoid the bother I suggested that you "go ahead and make those changes again" (I wonder if this wasn't your intention?). I did not mean that I agreed with those changes, I apologise if you were led to that conclusion. Citizen Canine (talk) 06:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. The beginning of the article reads, "According to tradition, the history of the Catholic Church begins with Jesus Christ and his teachings (c. 4 BC – c. AD 30) and the Catholic Church is a continuation of the early Christian community established by Jesus."
"Tradition" is, by the definition employed here on Wikipedia, "a belief or behavior passed down within a group or society with symbolic meaning or special significance with origins in the past." So the phrase "according to tradition" makes a rather important difference to the meaning. 50 sources seems a little overkill when 5 would have done. You threatened to go through them one-by-one challenging me to show how they do not support the proposed changes, as opposed to it being your responsibility to show that they do. To avoid the bother I suggested that you "go ahead and make those changes again" (I wonder if this wasn't your intention?). I did not mean that I agreed with those changes, I apologise if you were led to that conclusion. Citizen Canine (talk) 06:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
If the preposition "according to tradition" is absolutely necessary, and apparently it is because each time I tried to delete it someone put it back; then wouldn't it be the responsibility of those who required the preposition to be a part of the sentence in the first place, to document and provide sources that show why this preposition is absolutely necessary in this sentence? Further, how should we go about explaining away what the second paragraph of the "Tradition" article states about tradition in bold letters?
Indeed, it was my intention to,"go ahead and make those changes again", immediately following our dialogue. Unfortunately, because of Wikipedia's WP:EDITWAR policy I was forced to wait the time stipulated in the policy to make the changes. While waiting, I was threatened and bullied not to make the changes (please see /info/en/?search=User_talk:Ad_Orientem). As a result, I will continue my dialogue with the hopes that you, or someone else reading this, will make the changes on my behalf. Additionally, and for the time being, I would accept Zenadix's compromise at the beginning of this thread, "I agree that the original wording is preferable, and would support reverting back to it. Alternatively, a compromise solution would be to change it to something like "The Catholic Church is a continuation of the early Christian community established by Jesus Christ" or "The Catholic Church traces its history to Jesus Christ and the Apostles", which could potentially satisfy everyone. — Zenadix (talk) 05:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)."
|
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam ( talk) 10:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The point you make doesn't really stack up. Of course someone who can speak German and French is multilingual and it's so obvious that it adds nothing as an example. On the other hand, to claim a multilingual ability for AmE and BrE is nothing short of a lie, and so it isn't a weasel word/phrase - it's an untruth, as claims involving any other language variants would be (e.g. Canadian-French and 'French-French'). The numeric examples are good, and really they are all that's needed. "You say you are multilingual? Great. How many languages is that"? 31.52.166.114 ( talk) 19:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for watching over Momo Challenge and repeatedly reverting vandalism. I've put significant efforts in getting this page right, separating facts from hysteria, but none of that means anything if vandals shred the page with stupid comments. Cheers (raising my glass of lemonade to you)! Robincantin ( talk) 20:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping the ship afloat! See User:Jim1138/Single use IP for a list of articles that I put together. I asked Oshwah for advice user talk:Oshwah#Anon removing content Cheers Jim1138 talk 11:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Was Christopher Robin a bomb? 66.31.161.101 ( talk) 00:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Citizen Canine. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Citizen Canine. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi I removed the image because this is not good practice of dog hydrotherapy, in fact its very low standard. I wasn't able to insert a new image as I had to wait for my profile to be validated
There are great standards and codes of practice in the UK. National Association of canine hydrotherapists, of which I am the chair man.
I will remove the image again and leave a not/edit
Thanks
Adam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.139.10.58 ( talk) 12:38, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. This kind of tangles are generally very silly, but I do not think I've had met a sillier one than this. 80.182.219.166 ( talk) 19:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Buon Pomeriggio da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai, io sto abbastanza been per ora. Ti scrivo inoltre per chiederti un piccolo aiuto a livello grammaticale su un articolo che ho creato poco fa, riguardante un'attrice italiana. Claudia Letizia, mi chiedevo se potresti dedicarci 3 minuti del tuo prezioso tempo, qui l'articolo che ho dovuto abbozzare, e che non è andato bene agli amministratori italofoni, ti chiedo la cortesia di dedicarci un po' di tempo per migliorarlo in inglese, eventualmente al resto penserò io. per adesso grazie mille e buon pomeriggio ancora-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 14:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Buonasera, in italiano ancora non c'è per ora, a Dio piacendo non tarderà ad arrivare. Per quanto riguarda two seasons riguarda ambodue le stagioni, Se mi potresti dare un ulteriore mano te ne sarei infinitamente grato. un caro saluto da Coreca-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 18:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
Hello Citizen Canine, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
If the photo is not Jeanne, the subject of the article, and the caption refers to a mistake by no one who you can identify, (ie not the book it is reffed to) then what is the justification for having the photo there with any caption, especially one that does not say who made the mistake or what its relevance to acceptance of Calment's longevity claim is, eh? I think you have explained why the picture should be removed entirely. Overagainst ( talk) 20:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavery and religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islam and slavery ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
for ur hard work
ImmortalWizard
(chat) 13:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— ZuiTube—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mrwoogi010 ✉ 17:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the silly mistake in the title of Giovanni Gonnelli. I tried to fixed this a long time ago, but without success. Leo Uroboros ( talk) 20:40, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
It's amazing how we even need to argue over something like this. Keep at it. Syopsis ( talk) 16:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Could you please leave the hidden comment in place. Reverts should only be used for blatant vandalism etc. Otherwise you should use the talk page for consensus. As per the talk page, we are trying to minimise WP:recentism. It's a thing. Mozzie ( talk) 17:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
If you see a good-faith edit which you feel does not improve the article, make a good-faith effort to reword instead of reverting it. Similarly, if you make an edit which is good-faith reverted, do not simply reinstate your edit – leave the status quo up, or try an alternative way to make the change that includes feedback from the other editor.
See Talk:New_Zealand#Elizabeth_1_or_2 Ross Finlayson ( talk) 23:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
At talk TPG I agree a better short cut is a good idea. However, I noted criticisms of OTHERTALK and suggested an alternative phrasing. I look forward to your thoughts about the other wording and if that will work for you. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 15:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for the assistance at Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. Shellwood ( talk) 23:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)