Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 12:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Christopher Hart (novelist). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 13:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Christopher Hart (novelist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. See
BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
I am responding to your message on my talk page. Please be patient, and do not make further reverts to said article, otherwise you may lose your editing privileges. —
MelbourneStar☆
talk
13:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 13:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
— MelbourneStar☆ talk 13:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User:MelbourneStar. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 14:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Christopherharttoss reported by User:MelbourneStar (Result: ). Thank you. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 14:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. ...
discospinster
talk
14:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 12:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Christopher Hart (novelist). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 13:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Christopher Hart (novelist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. See
BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
I am responding to your message on my talk page. Please be patient, and do not make further reverts to said article, otherwise you may lose your editing privileges. —
MelbourneStar☆
talk
13:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 13:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
— MelbourneStar☆ talk 13:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User:MelbourneStar. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 14:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Christopherharttoss reported by User:MelbourneStar (Result: ). Thank you. — MelbourneStar☆ talk 14:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. ...
discospinster
talk
14:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)