![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 21:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Chris G has been identified as an
Awesome Wikipedian, Cheers, |
This is abuse of page protection. Please do not do it. And fix your talk page's editnotice, it breaks the page layout -- Gurch ( talk) 16:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
OMG adminbot! I raised an idea at AN which would prevent any false positive fiasco. In short, that would be having the bot still blocking the way it does now, but templating the talk page with an unblock request. That way, we can be sure someone had a look at the block. What do you think? -- lucasbfr talk 17:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Here about the bot, so under the same heading, but different subject. Basically, earlier I reviewed one of the block requests it posted(great idea by the way, and a positive block), and noticed that the page is not added to cat:temp, which means it means it won't get deleted in a month. Any possibility of having the bot add the cat when it adds the unblock notice? Cheers-- Jac16888 Talk 21:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
What's the story with this? It's showing up in category:request for unblock. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Chris, would it be possible for the bot which feeds edits to bot-related pages into the #wikipedia-BAG IRC channel to ignore bot edits, or at least the edits of my bot User:Bot0612? The reason I am asking is that otherwise this task will end up flooding the channel! Richard 0612 19:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/76/Droits_de_lHomme_sinking.jpg seems to be a corrupted JPEG, with the bottom 25% or so appearing blank. David Trochos ( talk) 19:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
I tried to revert the the re-direct edit here, but couldnt. thanks, CasualObserver'48 ( talk) 02:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
= User:Grawp. 71.194.32.252 ( talk) 02:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
86.133.34.204 ( talk · contribs · logs · block log). Quick fyi, just unblocked this IP. Its single edit was vandalism but an immediate block was a bit fast-- Jac16888 Talk 14:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you replaced some pages moved by new user Vil Adanrath ( talk); the activity looks like that of a banned user who was (I think) originally called Grawp, but I don't know how to report it; any ideas? Swanny18 ( talk) 15:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
This seems to have been actioned somewhat less than 48hrs after the last timestamp... -- Dweller ( talk) 16:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 21:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.
This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww.
Please note that I have corrected the information on the Commons image. You might want to review it and update the local copy. Jappalang ( talk) 06:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Chris, do you know what is happening here? The bot added the note to check the block that someone else applied. Cheers Kevin ( talk) 02:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
There has been a little discussion about Grawp socks and the deletion of their talkpages. Your bot suggests to place the {{ blockeduser}} template which does not include the temporary userpage category. possibly suggesting {{ indefblockeduser}} would be better. Agathoclea ( talk) 08:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey. Would you mind adding User talk:Aitias to User:AntiAbuseBot/autoprotect.js? :) Thank you. — Aitias // discussion 00:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 06:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 21:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Chris G has been identified as an
Awesome Wikipedian, Cheers, |
This is abuse of page protection. Please do not do it. And fix your talk page's editnotice, it breaks the page layout -- Gurch ( talk) 16:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
OMG adminbot! I raised an idea at AN which would prevent any false positive fiasco. In short, that would be having the bot still blocking the way it does now, but templating the talk page with an unblock request. That way, we can be sure someone had a look at the block. What do you think? -- lucasbfr talk 17:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Here about the bot, so under the same heading, but different subject. Basically, earlier I reviewed one of the block requests it posted(great idea by the way, and a positive block), and noticed that the page is not added to cat:temp, which means it means it won't get deleted in a month. Any possibility of having the bot add the cat when it adds the unblock notice? Cheers-- Jac16888 Talk 21:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
What's the story with this? It's showing up in category:request for unblock. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Chris, would it be possible for the bot which feeds edits to bot-related pages into the #wikipedia-BAG IRC channel to ignore bot edits, or at least the edits of my bot User:Bot0612? The reason I am asking is that otherwise this task will end up flooding the channel! Richard 0612 19:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/76/Droits_de_lHomme_sinking.jpg seems to be a corrupted JPEG, with the bottom 25% or so appearing blank. David Trochos ( talk) 19:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
I tried to revert the the re-direct edit here, but couldnt. thanks, CasualObserver'48 ( talk) 02:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
= User:Grawp. 71.194.32.252 ( talk) 02:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
86.133.34.204 ( talk · contribs · logs · block log). Quick fyi, just unblocked this IP. Its single edit was vandalism but an immediate block was a bit fast-- Jac16888 Talk 14:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you replaced some pages moved by new user Vil Adanrath ( talk); the activity looks like that of a banned user who was (I think) originally called Grawp, but I don't know how to report it; any ideas? Swanny18 ( talk) 15:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
This seems to have been actioned somewhat less than 48hrs after the last timestamp... -- Dweller ( talk) 16:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 21:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.
This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww.
Please note that I have corrected the information on the Commons image. You might want to review it and update the local copy. Jappalang ( talk) 06:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Chris, do you know what is happening here? The bot added the note to check the block that someone else applied. Cheers Kevin ( talk) 02:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
There has been a little discussion about Grawp socks and the deletion of their talkpages. Your bot suggests to place the {{ blockeduser}} template which does not include the temporary userpage category. possibly suggesting {{ indefblockeduser}} would be better. Agathoclea ( talk) 08:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey. Would you mind adding User talk:Aitias to User:AntiAbuseBot/autoprotect.js? :) Thank you. — Aitias // discussion 00:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 06:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)