Hello, Chienyichu1221, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Gaaiho PDF Suite main window in Window 10.png

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho PDF Suite main window in Window 10.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Gaaiho PDF Suite 4.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho PDF Suite 4.tif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:PDF Suite main window in Window 10.tif

Thanks for uploading File:PDF Suite main window in Window 10.tif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Gaaiho PDF Suite Icon.png

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho PDF Suite Icon.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Gaaiho PDF Reader 4.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho PDF Reader 4.tif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Gaaiho PDF Reader Icon.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho PDF Reader Icon.tif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Driver Icon.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 09:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Suite Icon.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 09:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Reader Icon.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Reader Icon.tif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Server Icon.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Server Icon.tif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:TSL Icon.png

Thanks for uploading File:TSL Icon.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Gaaiho brand name logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho brand name logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho brand name logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 06:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Reader Icon.tif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 06:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho PDF Reader Icon.tif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 06:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gaaiho PDF Reader 4.tif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 06:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Suite Icon.png

Thanks for uploading File:Suite Icon.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaaiho PDF Reader and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden ( talk) 09:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello! Chienyichu1221, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden ( talk) 09:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaaiho PDF and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden ( talk) 09:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Draft:Gaaiho PDF Reader, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden ( talk) 09:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Draft:Gaaiho PDF, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden ( talk) 09:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Driver Icon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –  Train2104 ( t •  c) 15:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TSL Icon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –  Train2104 ( t •  c) 15:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Suite Icon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –  Train2104 ( t •  c) 15:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Server Icon.tif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –  Train2104 ( t •  c) 15:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho PDF Reader Icon.tif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Gaaiho logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 03:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC) reply

I'll concentrate on the PDF article because both have the same problems. I deleted your article because

• it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the software company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the software company claims or interviewing its management. Most of your text was referenced to sources that were not independent third-party sources, but included the company itself or websites of dubious value. One (Softtonic) triggered Ublock, which told me it is a badware site. the "version history" reference redirects to a company spam page.
• There is absolutely nothing in the text to show that this meets the criteria, no sales figures, nothing except endless lists and tables telling us in minute detail every thing that the the product is supposed to do, although there are no sources for most of these claims
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Your text has virtually no content apart from unattributed descriptions and claims for the product that look as if they are what the company claims its product can do. There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to products.
• The key features and version history lists appear to be WP:OR since you don't even give the company as a source for these (except as the spam redirect), and can't be accepted. It's also possible that they aren't referenced because they are copyright violations, but I didn't check this because the article was unacceptable anyway.

I'm not minded to restore, since it was so bad that it was nominated for deletion even in draft space, which normally affords protection if there are easily fixable issues, and the text was largely unsourced or company-sourced, in fact the whole thing read like a company sales leaflet. If you decide to try again, you will have to show notability, provide proper third party references and dump all the unsourced "key features", which as it stands are just claims with no independent support, and which may have been copied from somewhere.

Please note the item on my talk page regarding your need to formally declare your COI before you attempt to recreate. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gaaiho logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC) reply

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chienyichu1221. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 ( talk) 15:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chienyichu1221 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

I am struggling with handling this sock puppetry issue and feel sorry for causing this issue here. I was not intended to do any illegitimate things here. The thing was that I was trying to post my articles through another account that I just created recently, which is "Michelle.chu". I didn't know that it would cause this account to be blocked. How am I supposed to fix this problem? I'm feeling worried about being blocked and regarded as a "Sockpuppetry". The articles that I posted through "Michelle.chu" have been posted through "Chienyichu1221" before but they were deleted. I was not sure if I could post them (rewritten already) again on "Chineyichu1221" so I created a new account and posted the rewritten version of the two articles on "Michelle.chu" instead. I didnt know that this act is illegitimate. Now I am working on the two articles again since the articles were being deleted again... due to being unambiguous advertising. Actually I am working for the corporation that owns the products I am writing about and I know the "conflict of interest". I am not here to promote the products. I was just asked to make an article. And there is also a concern about the policy of "verifiability". The corporation does not have sufficient independent sources; most of the sourses I used were reviews from some software websites, marketing materials like magazines and articles written by maybe not that well-organized publishers, and other works in which the corporation talks about itself. Does that mean the corporation does not qualify for an article yet? I am now revising my articles which were deleted yesterday and still have no idea through which account I am supposed to post them. Again I was not intended to do any illegitimate things or violate any policies. Please kindly let me know the proper way to handle this problem. Thank you so much and sorry for causing any inconvenience here.

Decline reason:

It's hard to see how you are acting in good faith here. You knew your article was inappropriate, so you set up an account to attempt to recreate the article when you knew you shouldn't. You knew about our policies on conflict-of-interest, but chose to deliberately violate them. The articles are overtly promotional. And, as you point out, there are issues with verifiability. That's violations of WP:SOCK, WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and WP:V. Given that, I'm not sure there's any benefit to unblocking you. However, if you can summarise each of those five policies and if you agree not to write about anything for which you have a conflict-of-interest (or, more specifically, tell us what other sorts of contributions you'd make), we'd certainly be willing to consider unblocking you. Yamla ( talk) 12:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chienyichu1221 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Thanks for the response and I am here to sincerely summarize each of the five policies you mentioned above: WP:SOCK, WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and WP:V. Firstly, my account was blocked due to being regarded as "Sock puppetry", which refers to users using alternative accounts for illigetimate purposes. According to WP:SOCK, each Wikipedia user is expected to have only one account unless there are valid reasons for doing so. The condition of maintaining multiple accounts exist only for legitimate uses. My case was that I posted the articles deleted in the draft namespace of the account "Chienyichu1221" onto the other account newly created named "Michele.chu" since I didn't notice that the act would be recognized as "creating new accounts to avoid detection" WP:SOCK. I should have followed what the draft reviewer said reformatting my articles, honestly disclosing my relationship with the company, and posting it. I shouldn't have done that through another account becuase the act was totally "Avoiding scrutiny", which makes other editors unable to know the patterns of my contributions. Secondly, I was asked to make articles for products owned by the corporation I belong to, so my case was "apparent COI" WP:COI, which means I have connection with the business or the products I am writing about. And it already caused BAD FEELING since everything wthin Wiki community should be strictly kept neutral and reliable. Wiki is a place for unpaid volunteers only. According to WP:PAID, as I work for the organization, I MUST disclose who my employer is and my relationship to the organization. What I should have chosen to do was requesting an independent editor to create the articles Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations. I need to disclose my relationship to the organization first, and gather all independnet reliable sources to those from WikiProject or anyone regularly responding to article requests; that way I won't be accused of advertising my organization. I need to clearly disclose COI in the request. I should always be honest in my relationship with my organization. No lies, otherwise articles will be deleted again.

Lastly, wiki articles must be created based on reliable, independent third-party sources that others using wiki can check. Everything in the articles should be verifiable even though it has been recognized as being true. As requesting articles is possibly the only way, I have to provide WikiProject writers with reliable sources, including Wikipedia:Verifiability published books, magazines, journals and mainstream newspapers. The problem is that there are no sufficient "reliable sources" for my organization; most of the sources I have are self-published sources or even questionable sources. So I am afraid that the WikiProject writers will have trouble creating articles. I hereby agree not to write about anything for which I have a COI. Thank you. Please kindly review my unblock request and let me know anything I need to further clarify. The article request can be conpleted only when my account is unblocked.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. No response to the questions about third account posted below. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is a rather nice summary of our policies. It leaves just one question open: If unblocked, what will you do on Wikipedia? Huon ( talk) 23:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the reply. I have been seriouly thinking about the sorts of contributions I can make.I will try my best to do good and trustable edits about the topics I am into such as history, music and so on. Also I am planning to upload some on my photographs that I think would be useful to Wiki. Those are the things I am intended to do and if you have any suggestions on that, please feel free to let me know. Thank you.

@ Huon: I am willing to unblock, what's your opinion? @ Bbb23: This is a CU block. Do you agree with unblocking? Vanjagenije (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC) reply

And the third account?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC) reply

My opinion isn't particularly relevant because I can't overturn a CheckUser block anyway. Personally I'd be willing to AGF and to unblock them if they agree not to write about that company, widely construed. Re-blocking them if necessary is cheap, and there are several innocent explanations for the third one-edit account, starting with WP:COWORKER. Huon ( talk) 19:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC) reply

I'm curious about the third account that the editor hasn't been as forthcoming about - User:Ruby19891221 SQL ^{Query me!} 02:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC) reply