This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | → | Archive 20 |
I will not click on AN, AN/I, WQA. I will not click on AN, AN/I, WQA. I will NOT click on AN, AN/I, WQA! (oh wait .. this isn't FB) — Ched : ? 09:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Ched - you have a question that a way -> BarkingMoon ( talk) 20:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
I think Techoutsider left. If you go to his talk page, you would go to a randomly named username. Also, if you follow the talk page, you would see Techoutsider requested to leave -- Tyw7 ( ☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Wikipedia wants YOU! Join today! 11:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
What would it take to get the user "Light current" unbanned and unblocked? He was banned over 4 years ago due to ref desk misbehavior, but there is no longer any energy by the ref desk regulars towards maintaining the ban. Rather than continuing the constant fighting, I would like to see him unshackled, to see if he can actually contribute something useful. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
I just sent you an e-mail on a semi-urgent matter. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey Ched. Did you see the article, American Women's Voluntary Services, I just wrote made DYK today (late last night your time)? How you doing? BarkingMoon ( talk) 20:14, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey there, just a notice, I replied to your post at Wikipedia talk:Do your own homework regarding the policy thing. -- œ ™ 16:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
See my response to you here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Flexibility BarkingMoon ( talk) 20:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
New article you may want to look at. Feel free to improve. BarkingMoon ( talk) 02:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Hmm...I'm not sure if we've ever worked on an article together. I see you around plenty, of course. It's possible that you know me from various reports at AIV, maybe. There is a tool that tells you how much editors have interacted with each other; User:Mandarax knows how to work it. Maybe I'll ask him after my nap, and then we can pick up the fight where we left it off all those years ago. ;) Thanks for the support, by the way. Drmies ( talk) 19:59, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Task Force Information: Recent updates include basic minor changes and condensing at the main page, new project sub page and talk for Radical Alternatives , additional comments on the main page talk page, and messages at Task force talk. A current priority is to reach suggested criteria/tasks for clerks, and then to establish a local consensus vis-à-vis clerking. Please remember to keep all the project and its talk pages on your watchlist.-- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Just for the record – I don't have the diff to hand either, but I distinctly remember saying that I would be checking Sarek's edits for (a) rollback abuse and (b) INVOLVED violations, both of which are explicit policy violations and thus come under the general heading of 'tracking an editor's contributions for policy violations' in my opinion.
However, that will hopefully become academic, because this interaction ban will stop Sarek from deliberately irritating me into objecting to their rampant abuse of admin tools. ╟─ Treasury Tag► condominium─╢ 22:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
For taking a lonely and brave position on a certain political 'smear' article. → Stani Stani 23:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop a note saying I respect your opinion and what you have to say. I'm uncomfortable that the article will help spread the neologism but am more uncomfortable that Wikipedia would shy away from covering topics that have been analyzed by good sources because they are damaging to a BLP. Anyways, know that I don't brush off your concerns. -- NeilN talk to me 00:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey Ched, long time no see. Just letting you know I am fully active again and underway with improving 24 articles. My aim is to get 24 (TV series) to GA, even FA. Let me know if you're still interested, but I just wanted to ket you know I am back, stronger than ever, and still committed to achieving my goals :) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 01:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For this clear, understanding and helpful message. Rd232 talk 22:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | → | Archive 20 |
I will not click on AN, AN/I, WQA. I will not click on AN, AN/I, WQA. I will NOT click on AN, AN/I, WQA! (oh wait .. this isn't FB) — Ched : ? 09:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Ched - you have a question that a way -> BarkingMoon ( talk) 20:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
I think Techoutsider left. If you go to his talk page, you would go to a randomly named username. Also, if you follow the talk page, you would see Techoutsider requested to leave -- Tyw7 ( ☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Wikipedia wants YOU! Join today! 11:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
What would it take to get the user "Light current" unbanned and unblocked? He was banned over 4 years ago due to ref desk misbehavior, but there is no longer any energy by the ref desk regulars towards maintaining the ban. Rather than continuing the constant fighting, I would like to see him unshackled, to see if he can actually contribute something useful. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
I just sent you an e-mail on a semi-urgent matter. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey Ched. Did you see the article, American Women's Voluntary Services, I just wrote made DYK today (late last night your time)? How you doing? BarkingMoon ( talk) 20:14, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey there, just a notice, I replied to your post at Wikipedia talk:Do your own homework regarding the policy thing. -- œ ™ 16:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
See my response to you here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Flexibility BarkingMoon ( talk) 20:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
New article you may want to look at. Feel free to improve. BarkingMoon ( talk) 02:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Hmm...I'm not sure if we've ever worked on an article together. I see you around plenty, of course. It's possible that you know me from various reports at AIV, maybe. There is a tool that tells you how much editors have interacted with each other; User:Mandarax knows how to work it. Maybe I'll ask him after my nap, and then we can pick up the fight where we left it off all those years ago. ;) Thanks for the support, by the way. Drmies ( talk) 19:59, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Task Force Information: Recent updates include basic minor changes and condensing at the main page, new project sub page and talk for Radical Alternatives , additional comments on the main page talk page, and messages at Task force talk. A current priority is to reach suggested criteria/tasks for clerks, and then to establish a local consensus vis-à-vis clerking. Please remember to keep all the project and its talk pages on your watchlist.-- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Just for the record – I don't have the diff to hand either, but I distinctly remember saying that I would be checking Sarek's edits for (a) rollback abuse and (b) INVOLVED violations, both of which are explicit policy violations and thus come under the general heading of 'tracking an editor's contributions for policy violations' in my opinion.
However, that will hopefully become academic, because this interaction ban will stop Sarek from deliberately irritating me into objecting to their rampant abuse of admin tools. ╟─ Treasury Tag► condominium─╢ 22:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
For taking a lonely and brave position on a certain political 'smear' article. → Stani Stani 23:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop a note saying I respect your opinion and what you have to say. I'm uncomfortable that the article will help spread the neologism but am more uncomfortable that Wikipedia would shy away from covering topics that have been analyzed by good sources because they are damaging to a BLP. Anyways, know that I don't brush off your concerns. -- NeilN talk to me 00:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey Ched, long time no see. Just letting you know I am fully active again and underway with improving 24 articles. My aim is to get 24 (TV series) to GA, even FA. Let me know if you're still interested, but I just wanted to ket you know I am back, stronger than ever, and still committed to achieving my goals :) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 01:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For this clear, understanding and helpful message. Rd232 talk 22:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |