Speedy deletion of Charles Edward Walker
A tag has been placed on Charles Edward Walker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}} to the top of
the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Redfarmer (
talk)
18:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see
Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Redfarmer ( talk) 18:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with
Charles Edward Walker. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{
hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
Ward3001 (
talk)
19:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Please note that Wikipedia has guidelines for notability and inclusion in articles. Please see
WP:BIO. You have not demonstrated the notability for Charles Walker; simply stating "notable" is insufficient. Also please note above the information about making edits about yourself and conflict of interest. If you are in fact notable, someone else needs to make the addition along with evidence of notability.
Please also note that Wikipedia has rules about repeatedly adding information to an article after it has been legitimately deleted. Please read
WP:3RR. If you continue doing so you can be
blocked from editing because of
vandalism.
Ward3001 (
talk)
21:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Wake Forest University. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Ward3001 (
talk)
21:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Charles Edward Walker
A tag has been placed on Charles Edward Walker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}} to the top of
the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Redfarmer (
talk)
18:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see
Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Redfarmer ( talk) 18:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with
Charles Edward Walker. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{
hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
Ward3001 (
talk)
19:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Please note that Wikipedia has guidelines for notability and inclusion in articles. Please see
WP:BIO. You have not demonstrated the notability for Charles Walker; simply stating "notable" is insufficient. Also please note above the information about making edits about yourself and conflict of interest. If you are in fact notable, someone else needs to make the addition along with evidence of notability.
Please also note that Wikipedia has rules about repeatedly adding information to an article after it has been legitimately deleted. Please read
WP:3RR. If you continue doing so you can be
blocked from editing because of
vandalism.
Ward3001 (
talk)
21:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Wake Forest University. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Ward3001 (
talk)
21:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)