Hi Cenbutz1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Grimes2 ( talk) 15:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to CDU Thuringia. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 ^{( talk | contribs)} 07:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi. Please stop moving National Democratic Party of Germany without consensus, as per a recent discussion on that article's talk page. You can seek consensus via WP:RM. Curbon7 ( talk) 17:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I honestly don't understand why? The party is now officially called that, even the German-language Wikipedia has adopted the new name as the page title. So give me a good reason why the page is still called by the old name! Cenbutz1 ( talk) 18:25, 12 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia decisions are decided by consensus not individual editor's opinions. Please go to the article talk page to discuss title changes rather than move-warring the article. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Fifth Vranitzky government, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner ( talk) 09:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any references or sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fifth Vranitzky government and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt ( talk) 11:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Cenbutz1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt ( talk) 11:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Klima government. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 06:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taking Out The Trash was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Klima government and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 23:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

What do you want from me? This is the only source that can find! To be honest, I got the information from the German-language Wikipedia, where there are no sources. EITHER TAKE IT OR DELETE THE PAGE! Cenbutz1 ( talk) 23:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Cenbutz1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CDU Thuringia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Cenbutz1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fifth Vranitzky government, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 12:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Do you even know what you were reverting on the 2019 Austrian legislative election rather than just hitting the undo button because you got upset by some misleading stuff you saw in a Youtube video? Your edits are removing the Chancellor before and after the election from the infobox and removing the formatting fixes to the seats by state table. Number 5 7 21:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Regarding your repeated reinstatement of the Pilz party, the stable version of the article for several years has been with only five parties. As your edits have been reverted, you are expected to gain consensus to add it in, rather than try and force it back in by repeatedly reverting. Per WP:BRD, you should start a discussion on the talk page to try and gain consensus for your proposed changes to the status quo. Cheers, Number 5 7 14:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Smartass Cenbutz1 ( talk) 15:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC) reply