This user has been
banned indefinitely from editing the English Wikipedia by the community. Administrators, please review the
banning policy before unblocking. ( block log · contributions · Community discussion) |
|
Thanks for your evidence-based edits, clean-ups and general busting of anti-social knowledge destroying cabals. :-) You deserve Admin rights. 120.17.210.246 ( talk) 14:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. You must provide links to my "edit warring" edits. Ремарка для русскоговорящих - я так понимаю скайпочаты не дремлют? Cathry ( talk) 15:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Cathry ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't agree that my recent edits were edit-warring, as they were single reverts of deletions. Also, I don't agree with Ymblanter conclusion at noticeboard about " fringe theories and original research". Cathry ( talk) 16:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Ymblanter's block was correct. I am extending the block to 2 weeks as a result of the personal attacks you have made as 120.17.210.246 ( talk · contribs) whilst blocked. Further misconduct is likely to result in the block being further lengthened, or potentially made indefinite. WJBscribe (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cathry ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't agree that my recent edits were edit-warring, as they were single reverts of deletions. Also, I don't agree with Ymblanter conclusion at noticeboard about " fringe theories and original research" Also, it is extremely outrageous to claim I am acting with ip "120..." My ip located in thousand of kilometres from this ip location, it can be simply checked. Cathry ( talk) 17:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is essentially a repost of your previous unblock appeal, which has already been declined. Yunshui 雲 水 08:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User:Vanjagenije, I see you blocked some ip range with the reason "block evasion". it is unclear what block do you mean. User:Zefr put his opponent to SPI before he complain to you. He got the answer that user is different from me. So there is no blocks for 120.17.... to evade Cathry ( talk) 11:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Per the discussion at ANI, found here, you are hereby indefinitely banned from editing the English Wikipedia. You may file an appeal in 6 months. If you are caught evading your ban, the appeal timer will reset.— CYBERPOWER ( Message) 00:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
This user has been
banned indefinitely from editing the English Wikipedia by the community. Administrators, please review the
banning policy before unblocking. ( block log · contributions · Community discussion) |
|
Thanks for your evidence-based edits, clean-ups and general busting of anti-social knowledge destroying cabals. :-) You deserve Admin rights. 120.17.210.246 ( talk) 14:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. You must provide links to my "edit warring" edits. Ремарка для русскоговорящих - я так понимаю скайпочаты не дремлют? Cathry ( talk) 15:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Cathry ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't agree that my recent edits were edit-warring, as they were single reverts of deletions. Also, I don't agree with Ymblanter conclusion at noticeboard about " fringe theories and original research". Cathry ( talk) 16:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Ymblanter's block was correct. I am extending the block to 2 weeks as a result of the personal attacks you have made as 120.17.210.246 ( talk · contribs) whilst blocked. Further misconduct is likely to result in the block being further lengthened, or potentially made indefinite. WJBscribe (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cathry ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't agree that my recent edits were edit-warring, as they were single reverts of deletions. Also, I don't agree with Ymblanter conclusion at noticeboard about " fringe theories and original research" Also, it is extremely outrageous to claim I am acting with ip "120..." My ip located in thousand of kilometres from this ip location, it can be simply checked. Cathry ( talk) 17:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is essentially a repost of your previous unblock appeal, which has already been declined. Yunshui 雲 水 08:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User:Vanjagenije, I see you blocked some ip range with the reason "block evasion". it is unclear what block do you mean. User:Zefr put his opponent to SPI before he complain to you. He got the answer that user is different from me. So there is no blocks for 120.17.... to evade Cathry ( talk) 11:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Per the discussion at ANI, found here, you are hereby indefinitely banned from editing the English Wikipedia. You may file an appeal in 6 months. If you are caught evading your ban, the appeal timer will reset.— CYBERPOWER ( Message) 00:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)