We the undersigned, request that
User:Catfish Jim restore the soapdish. Catfish Jim has requested there be 20 signatories for the offer to be considered.
YES. I remember the issue from your RfA and I thought at the time how damned silly the objection was. Far sillier than your former username. Restore it. For the lulz and to confound the bluenozes.
Miss E. Lovetinkle (
talk)
12:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)reply
YES 100%! What the hell are you trying to do, confuse all the newbie editors?!!! Seriously, the soapdish is cool and has distinguished you and allowed other editors to remember you more so rather than just one more semi-annon editor that gets forgotten in the mad scheme of things. You are already an excellent Admin.; please keep that in mind too, so people can find you for help editing the Wikipedia. --
Leahtwosaints (
talk)
16:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Absolutely. One of the best usernames in the history of ever. I would have been a huge fan of that blues band just on name alone. (note: this statement is not in my official capacity, just my personal opinion as an AWESOME username)
Christine, Wikimedia Foundation (
talk)
19:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes. Aye liked the soapdish. And congrats on the adminship. That slipped by me but you're exactly the sort of person we need for admin duties. --
Derek Ross |
Talk06:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)reply
comment. Is there a connection between a catfish and a soapdish? I need to know this important piece of information before deciding.
Carson101 (
talk)
15:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Neutral. The soapdish will always be there for me, spelled out or not. Alternatively, you could follow my example and remove the "Catfish" as well, which would have an amusing symmetry.
Mac19:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)reply
We the undersigned, request that
User:Catfish Jim restore the soapdish. Catfish Jim has requested there be 20 signatories for the offer to be considered.
YES. I remember the issue from your RfA and I thought at the time how damned silly the objection was. Far sillier than your former username. Restore it. For the lulz and to confound the bluenozes.
Miss E. Lovetinkle (
talk)
12:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)reply
YES 100%! What the hell are you trying to do, confuse all the newbie editors?!!! Seriously, the soapdish is cool and has distinguished you and allowed other editors to remember you more so rather than just one more semi-annon editor that gets forgotten in the mad scheme of things. You are already an excellent Admin.; please keep that in mind too, so people can find you for help editing the Wikipedia. --
Leahtwosaints (
talk)
16:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Absolutely. One of the best usernames in the history of ever. I would have been a huge fan of that blues band just on name alone. (note: this statement is not in my official capacity, just my personal opinion as an AWESOME username)
Christine, Wikimedia Foundation (
talk)
19:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes. Aye liked the soapdish. And congrats on the adminship. That slipped by me but you're exactly the sort of person we need for admin duties. --
Derek Ross |
Talk06:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)reply
comment. Is there a connection between a catfish and a soapdish? I need to know this important piece of information before deciding.
Carson101 (
talk)
15:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Neutral. The soapdish will always be there for me, spelled out or not. Alternatively, you could follow my example and remove the "Catfish" as well, which would have an amusing symmetry.
Mac19:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)reply