![]() |
Hi Canadaindiefilms! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
The article Shannon T. Boodram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to be WP:VANITY...
Sources are sparse and focus on her book "LAID"
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
PeterWesco (
talk)
02:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
The article Derek Lebrero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
PeterWesco (
talk)
02:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Meanie (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
De728631 (
talk)
11:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Lebrero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Lebrero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PeterWesco ( talk) 20:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 31#OTRS pending since long ago, edited in May. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Canadaindiefilms! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
The article Shannon T. Boodram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to be WP:VANITY...
Sources are sparse and focus on her book "LAID"
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
PeterWesco (
talk)
02:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
The article Derek Lebrero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
PeterWesco (
talk)
02:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Meanie (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
De728631 (
talk)
11:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Lebrero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Lebrero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PeterWesco ( talk) 20:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 31#OTRS pending since long ago, edited in May. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)