This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
I already started working on the article you can see the Background and composition section [ here, i think it's decent. I suggest we work together on it. Are you for? Tomica1111 ( talk) 13:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I addressed all of the original issues with the article as well as address the new issues concerning the lack of information that were keeping it from GA status. Also, I received comments from Wikipedian Penguin, who noted two other issues (which I fixed) and said otherwise there weren't any other issues that he could see. Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Starting a new section lol. For "Bye Bye", it clarifies it in the next sentence.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:42, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Frankly telling you, NO. I have been very busy on Best Thing I Never Had. Thank you very much Calvin. You are very patient and sometimes i wonder from where you get that patience to review so many articles. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=80903&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=7825
Have a nice laugh. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, my username is Anger-Cola. I've just thought that your signature was changed from "999" to "NaNaNaC'mon", so while "999" is part of your username, "NaNaNaC'mon" came from the lyrics of some other song. How did your signature change over time? A\/\93r- (0la 01:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
— WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 16:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Non-free files are only allowed in mainspace, so better remove the Only Girl video screenshot. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, could you please comment on Talk:Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus#Move back? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 18:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey there Calvin999, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Calvin999.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Everything (Lifehouse song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed here until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence and not on a majority of votes that follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rp0211 (talk2me) 16:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at User_talk:Two_Hearted_River/Sandbox3. You are receiving this message because you are one of the twelve editors I have identified concerning questionable GA review practices. Two Hearted River ( paddle / fish) 03:55, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Calvin? How are you my friend? Where is the massage? Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Calvin999. I understand that because of the good article situation, it is in your best interest not to review my article to avoid further conflict. It is probably a good thing that it waits on the nomination page until someone else can review it. Thanks for your time. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Also, If I can comment, the audio sample should be reduced to 22 seconds, otherwise, should be removed, and this one is 25 :/ ! Tomica1111 ( talk) 16:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:34, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Check on It and work it out. Lol. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, it's the reviewer of that article. I have nothing to do right now and I can start reviewing. However, seeing how you are involved in a few other reviews ( "S&M" (song), Loud (Rihanna album), " Love the Way You Lie" and several pending nominees), I can move on to reviewing other articles and come back to WYT when you're ready. I mean, if you're sure you can get through this within a matter of days, that's fine with me and I can start the review right away. Other nominators may become frustrated on me and I will have to review theirs soon as I promised. Thank you, — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 19:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, would please participate in this discussion? Thank for your time. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 03:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
This is why we have to be careful over genres... here. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 22:29, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I believe that I put enough foundation to explain that the song " Cheers (drink to that) " is of a kind Dancehall Pop. This way that I do not explain because I me eliminate everything what investigates and Poprock put without ningun on foundation in reference, being that I put 3 references... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potros salvajes ardientes ( talk • contribs) 23:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
There are several issues needed to be addressed. See the full review here. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey Calv. So I don't usually have this problem, but I have become so immersed in "Obsessed", and wrote it when I was out of it (no pun intended lol.), that I need some outside eyes. Can you do a basic copy-edit on it here in my sandbox? :)-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 16:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for commenting on the Lucky Day deletion btw, but one thing, you need to remove the Loud album cover in your sandbox, but great job on the article! Thanks, -- FeuDeJoie ( talk) 18:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Would you mind commenting on this post at the RS noticeboard regarding the reliability of a sales source? Dan56 ( talk) 18:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I believe that I put enough foundation to explain that the song " Cheers (drink to that) " is of a kind Dancehall pop. This way that I do not explain because I me eliminate everything what investigates and Poprock put without ningun on foundation in reference, being that I put 3 references... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potros salvajes ardientes ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
On the review page. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey Calv, how are you? What's up? I need some favor from you. I'm working on " Disturbia" to make it GA. However, I'm finding some trouble with the video section - I can find some reliable sources for the Background of it. Can you search something? Thanks Tomica1111 ( talk) 18:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
We can start the article editing. I am free. Tomica1111 ( talk) 22:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Calvin, there's a third banner up on the article and the live performances section may be over-detailed. You might want to trim it down a bit because the last thing I want is to fail this GAN after you working so hard on LTWYL GAN. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Calvin. I'm afraid the Wait Your Turn article you wrote may incorporate a copyright infringement of an MTV article it cites, since the text is very closely paraphrased. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:
The source article says:
As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously in order to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch.
The relevant section of the article has been tagged with a notice of these copyright concerns. So that we can be sure it does not constitute a derivative work, this paragraph should be rewritten. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".
Please let me know if you have questions about this. Two Hearted River ( paddle / fish) 11:50, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Two Hearted River here with a message from Calvin999 copied from my talk page: Feel free to c/e the Music video Synopsis, but I am really gonna fight for the description of the AMAs to remain as it is, because it is in my own words and I wrote it, with reference to only a couple of quotes (Kaufman is also noted at the start). It doesn't matter who writes the description, that order will be same every time no matter who writes it, because that is the order in which the events happen in the performance, and there is nothing wrong with that and it is obviously the correct way to write about something. Calvin• NaNaNaC'mon! 19:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Yes, the examples quoted above takes too much from the original article and presents it as if it is original Wikipedia material. It needs rewriting.— OpenFuture ( talk) 19:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC) |
Response to third opinion request: |
I saw another 3O request, and am providing one. The article sections in question still contain close paraphrasing - superficial changes -and- poor source and quote citation. It needs rewriting. Still.-- Elvey ( talk) 16:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC) |
I'm not asking to get involved with any conflict, I just wasn't sure what you was trying to say. I never asked for a 3O, and still maintain that at least the music video synopsis no longer needs a sectin banner, because I completely re-wrote it and it is completely different. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 16:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
— WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I left it and removed it for privacy reasons. Look at your history :)-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 18:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For your hard work and patience into making " Wait Your Turn" a certified good article, despite the odds. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, can you please participate in [1]? Thanks. Btw I voted of course Oppose. The article it's great. Tomica1111 ( talk) 17:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Of course not! What makes you think you did something wrong? Often I choose not to archive comments left on my talk page, but I mean no offense. I tend to only archive things that I will need for future reference. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Calvin what are we doing with the article? If we do not manage to do the references, will fail until Friday. Hey, I'm not home tomorrow until maybe 17-18 o'clock. Can you work on the article a little bit, and I will continue when I come home? I really do not want to fail Tomica1111 ( talk) 23:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation. Calvin, last time at the GAR, you did not really understand what i meant for the composition section. I told you to use material from the critical reception and not just do a copy-paste. Do you want me to post you some guidelines which will help you know how to craft a composition section step by step so that you do not miss anything? Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
-- Addi hockey 10 e-mail 17:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
If it's okay with you, if you have time, could you add all that music notes info on " Love the Way You Lie"? I'm talking about the chord progression and anything of that nature. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey Calvin. Hope you're well. User:Two Hearted River has responded to your post at User_talk:Fastily#Hello; perhaps you might be interested in commenting. I'm going to hold my tongue for now, because, while I could verbally rip him/her to shreds, s/he appears to be, albeit misguided, a good-faith user. That aside, I still intend to review and potentially close the discussion within 2 days. Best, FASTILY (TALK) 02:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Note: I have brought this dispute to the dispute resolution noticeboard. Two Hearted River ( paddle / fish) 14:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
You can clearly see what happened through the article's history. What do you think ? You are my idol so I copy all the time?! Obviously no, that was also my idea. Btw It stays Tomica1111 ( talk) 16:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
What statements? I don't get what you are getting at. It has everything to do with it that I created the article, and I provided the foundations for it. Yes you have contributed in the Critical reception and Music video sub sections, but looking at the article's history, but for the Background and composition, this, this, this and this are hardly significant edits, they are minor. And as for the Lead, there is no record of you making edits to it in the article history there. And you really should write an edit summary. When did we ever agree to co-nominating? If you wanted to co-edit and co-nominate, you should have asked me, not spring on me and tell me what is happening. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 17:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes I know but you didn't agree to it. "Never mind I will remove the quote" read like you was only removing the quote and that was the end of it. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 20:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey there Calvin999, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Calvin999/Sandbox14.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I will start a new section, cause the previous one is overloaded. Hey I also found this, It can be used in the Reception of the video. It contains a reference to the Hurricane Irene. Can we write that that is a joke or maybe a negative review? Cause I can really understand the text. Tomica1111 ( talk) 12:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this, I don't know whether you are aware, but you can place those parameters in any random way within the template and they would still show in the same way. — Legolas (talk2me) 17:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes, those tables were what I was thinking of. You should replicate that format for the rest of the list, then work on expanding the lead. Bradley0110 ( talk) 11:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I was thinking about the too, and I'll do that the next time. :) - Sauloviegas ( talk) 13:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks again :-) -- Addi hockey 10 e-mail 02:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Calvin. Did you mean that i should do a mini-review? Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
I already started working on the article you can see the Background and composition section [ here, i think it's decent. I suggest we work together on it. Are you for? Tomica1111 ( talk) 13:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I addressed all of the original issues with the article as well as address the new issues concerning the lack of information that were keeping it from GA status. Also, I received comments from Wikipedian Penguin, who noted two other issues (which I fixed) and said otherwise there weren't any other issues that he could see. Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Starting a new section lol. For "Bye Bye", it clarifies it in the next sentence.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:42, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Frankly telling you, NO. I have been very busy on Best Thing I Never Had. Thank you very much Calvin. You are very patient and sometimes i wonder from where you get that patience to review so many articles. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=80903&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=7825
Have a nice laugh. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, my username is Anger-Cola. I've just thought that your signature was changed from "999" to "NaNaNaC'mon", so while "999" is part of your username, "NaNaNaC'mon" came from the lyrics of some other song. How did your signature change over time? A\/\93r- (0la 01:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
— WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 16:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Non-free files are only allowed in mainspace, so better remove the Only Girl video screenshot. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, could you please comment on Talk:Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus#Move back? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 18:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey there Calvin999, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Calvin999.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Everything (Lifehouse song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed here until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence and not on a majority of votes that follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rp0211 (talk2me) 16:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at User_talk:Two_Hearted_River/Sandbox3. You are receiving this message because you are one of the twelve editors I have identified concerning questionable GA review practices. Two Hearted River ( paddle / fish) 03:55, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Calvin? How are you my friend? Where is the massage? Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Calvin999. I understand that because of the good article situation, it is in your best interest not to review my article to avoid further conflict. It is probably a good thing that it waits on the nomination page until someone else can review it. Thanks for your time. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Also, If I can comment, the audio sample should be reduced to 22 seconds, otherwise, should be removed, and this one is 25 :/ ! Tomica1111 ( talk) 16:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:34, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Check on It and work it out. Lol. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, it's the reviewer of that article. I have nothing to do right now and I can start reviewing. However, seeing how you are involved in a few other reviews ( "S&M" (song), Loud (Rihanna album), " Love the Way You Lie" and several pending nominees), I can move on to reviewing other articles and come back to WYT when you're ready. I mean, if you're sure you can get through this within a matter of days, that's fine with me and I can start the review right away. Other nominators may become frustrated on me and I will have to review theirs soon as I promised. Thank you, — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 19:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, would please participate in this discussion? Thank for your time. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 03:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
This is why we have to be careful over genres... here. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 22:29, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I believe that I put enough foundation to explain that the song " Cheers (drink to that) " is of a kind Dancehall Pop. This way that I do not explain because I me eliminate everything what investigates and Poprock put without ningun on foundation in reference, being that I put 3 references... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potros salvajes ardientes ( talk • contribs) 23:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
There are several issues needed to be addressed. See the full review here. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey Calv. So I don't usually have this problem, but I have become so immersed in "Obsessed", and wrote it when I was out of it (no pun intended lol.), that I need some outside eyes. Can you do a basic copy-edit on it here in my sandbox? :)-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 16:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for commenting on the Lucky Day deletion btw, but one thing, you need to remove the Loud album cover in your sandbox, but great job on the article! Thanks, -- FeuDeJoie ( talk) 18:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Would you mind commenting on this post at the RS noticeboard regarding the reliability of a sales source? Dan56 ( talk) 18:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I believe that I put enough foundation to explain that the song " Cheers (drink to that) " is of a kind Dancehall pop. This way that I do not explain because I me eliminate everything what investigates and Poprock put without ningun on foundation in reference, being that I put 3 references... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potros salvajes ardientes ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
On the review page. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey Calv, how are you? What's up? I need some favor from you. I'm working on " Disturbia" to make it GA. However, I'm finding some trouble with the video section - I can find some reliable sources for the Background of it. Can you search something? Thanks Tomica1111 ( talk) 18:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
We can start the article editing. I am free. Tomica1111 ( talk) 22:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Calvin, there's a third banner up on the article and the live performances section may be over-detailed. You might want to trim it down a bit because the last thing I want is to fail this GAN after you working so hard on LTWYL GAN. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 13:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Calvin. I'm afraid the Wait Your Turn article you wrote may incorporate a copyright infringement of an MTV article it cites, since the text is very closely paraphrased. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:
The source article says:
As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously in order to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch.
The relevant section of the article has been tagged with a notice of these copyright concerns. So that we can be sure it does not constitute a derivative work, this paragraph should be rewritten. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".
Please let me know if you have questions about this. Two Hearted River ( paddle / fish) 11:50, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Two Hearted River here with a message from Calvin999 copied from my talk page: Feel free to c/e the Music video Synopsis, but I am really gonna fight for the description of the AMAs to remain as it is, because it is in my own words and I wrote it, with reference to only a couple of quotes (Kaufman is also noted at the start). It doesn't matter who writes the description, that order will be same every time no matter who writes it, because that is the order in which the events happen in the performance, and there is nothing wrong with that and it is obviously the correct way to write about something. Calvin• NaNaNaC'mon! 19:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Yes, the examples quoted above takes too much from the original article and presents it as if it is original Wikipedia material. It needs rewriting.— OpenFuture ( talk) 19:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC) |
Response to third opinion request: |
I saw another 3O request, and am providing one. The article sections in question still contain close paraphrasing - superficial changes -and- poor source and quote citation. It needs rewriting. Still.-- Elvey ( talk) 16:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC) |
I'm not asking to get involved with any conflict, I just wasn't sure what you was trying to say. I never asked for a 3O, and still maintain that at least the music video synopsis no longer needs a sectin banner, because I completely re-wrote it and it is completely different. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 16:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
— WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I left it and removed it for privacy reasons. Look at your history :)-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 18:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For your hard work and patience into making " Wait Your Turn" a certified good article, despite the odds. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, can you please participate in [1]? Thanks. Btw I voted of course Oppose. The article it's great. Tomica1111 ( talk) 17:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Of course not! What makes you think you did something wrong? Often I choose not to archive comments left on my talk page, but I mean no offense. I tend to only archive things that I will need for future reference. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Calvin what are we doing with the article? If we do not manage to do the references, will fail until Friday. Hey, I'm not home tomorrow until maybe 17-18 o'clock. Can you work on the article a little bit, and I will continue when I come home? I really do not want to fail Tomica1111 ( talk) 23:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation. Calvin, last time at the GAR, you did not really understand what i meant for the composition section. I told you to use material from the critical reception and not just do a copy-paste. Do you want me to post you some guidelines which will help you know how to craft a composition section step by step so that you do not miss anything? Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
-- Addi hockey 10 e-mail 17:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
If it's okay with you, if you have time, could you add all that music notes info on " Love the Way You Lie"? I'm talking about the chord progression and anything of that nature. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey Calvin. Hope you're well. User:Two Hearted River has responded to your post at User_talk:Fastily#Hello; perhaps you might be interested in commenting. I'm going to hold my tongue for now, because, while I could verbally rip him/her to shreds, s/he appears to be, albeit misguided, a good-faith user. That aside, I still intend to review and potentially close the discussion within 2 days. Best, FASTILY (TALK) 02:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Note: I have brought this dispute to the dispute resolution noticeboard. Two Hearted River ( paddle / fish) 14:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
You can clearly see what happened through the article's history. What do you think ? You are my idol so I copy all the time?! Obviously no, that was also my idea. Btw It stays Tomica1111 ( talk) 16:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
What statements? I don't get what you are getting at. It has everything to do with it that I created the article, and I provided the foundations for it. Yes you have contributed in the Critical reception and Music video sub sections, but looking at the article's history, but for the Background and composition, this, this, this and this are hardly significant edits, they are minor. And as for the Lead, there is no record of you making edits to it in the article history there. And you really should write an edit summary. When did we ever agree to co-nominating? If you wanted to co-edit and co-nominate, you should have asked me, not spring on me and tell me what is happening. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 17:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes I know but you didn't agree to it. "Never mind I will remove the quote" read like you was only removing the quote and that was the end of it. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 20:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey there Calvin999, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Calvin999/Sandbox14.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I will start a new section, cause the previous one is overloaded. Hey I also found this, It can be used in the Reception of the video. It contains a reference to the Hurricane Irene. Can we write that that is a joke or maybe a negative review? Cause I can really understand the text. Tomica1111 ( talk) 12:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this, I don't know whether you are aware, but you can place those parameters in any random way within the template and they would still show in the same way. — Legolas (talk2me) 17:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes, those tables were what I was thinking of. You should replicate that format for the rest of the list, then work on expanding the lead. Bradley0110 ( talk) 11:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I was thinking about the too, and I'll do that the next time. :) - Sauloviegas ( talk) 13:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks again :-) -- Addi hockey 10 e-mail 02:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Calvin. Did you mean that i should do a mini-review? Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)