![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 32 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
On this topic: Apparently it's a good question, because you get varied responses. And Sarah's solid answer is what I'd expect from a teahouse kind of person. :-) ("I thought she was an admin already!").
But I love puzzles, and I can't resist providing my own question/answer: I love strategic minimum actions. What if all one were to do would be to rollback the rollbacker? What would happen next? -- Kim Bruning ( talk) 15:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC) I can think of at least 2 diverging paths resulting from that action, with various options for more or less desirable actions along the way. What do you predict will happen?
Well they would get an oppose vote from me (and probably quite a few others). I can see couple of diverging paths:
*It is how it played out, but I also think at that point the rollbacker might be a little too caught in the moment to think about what's happening.
Although it seems that scenario has a lot of steps, it really doesn't, I've just worked the thing through until there was no where else to a stop. It could stop at any of those numbers, that is, steps 1, 2 & 3 are the same thing. Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 04:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
First,I would like to congratulate you for being a wiki editor for 3 years. I want to introduce myself as Monalika,Bangalore,India.I m not a wiki editor.But last week i found that an article on a major engineering institute of my city MSRIT lacked some references(I mean citations).I have added state government,Central government of India,affiliating Universities Newspaper reports,citation links from companies like IBM,Scneider electric,citation from International groups like IEEE,TED . Somewhere last week you have RIGHTLY put a notice that the article lacked citations.So I have put it.Since there were no citations at that moment of time someone even went to the extent of deleting the article.
I humbly request you to check and have a look at the article and say/edit whether it s written properly or not — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.17.118 ( talk) 18:54, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hi, You've worked on a "Edit War" on the Ed Kosiski page [1] before. Would you please revert the latest edit by 174.70.63.4? Additional information is on the talk page: [2] Thank you.
Thanks - and sorry for forgetting the signature. 174.70.63.4 ( talk) 04:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hmm ... on the one hand I am flattered by that expression of trust. I can see the need and see where I could be helpful on the user-renaming end. But ... it does also include closing RFAs, and I don't have a lot of experience hanging out there (which might be a plus). I just worry about the time it might take.
I see you have persuaded at least Beeblebrox and someone else to go for it. Let's see how that goes. Give it a month or so more and I might be interested.
(Sorry I didn't get more of a chance to talk to you at Wikimania). Daniel Case ( talk) 20:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, my brain does not seem to be wired up for real editing. I suspect I am destined to be a life-long Huggle jockey. I might try writing tools, I've written tons of code. Thanks for the inspiration! Jim1138 ( talk) 09:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I was not attacking, i just have a VERY strong opinion that the article is still VERY POV and that the title of the article is WONG and does not stand up to the pillars. I expressed my opinion very strongly to make a point. Aperseghin ( talk) 13:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
On this topic: Apparently it's a good question, because you get varied responses. And Sarah's solid answer is what I'd expect from a teahouse kind of person. :-) ("I thought she was an admin already!").
But I love puzzles, and I can't resist providing my own question/answer: I love strategic minimum actions. What if all one were to do would be to rollback the rollbacker? What would happen next? -- Kim Bruning ( talk) 15:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC) I can think of at least 2 diverging paths resulting from that action, with various options for more or less desirable actions along the way. What do you predict will happen?
Well they would get an oppose vote from me (and probably quite a few others). I can see couple of diverging paths:
*It is how it played out, but I also think at that point the rollbacker might be a little too caught in the moment to think about what's happening.
Although it seems that scenario has a lot of steps, it really doesn't, I've just worked the thing through until there was no where else to a stop. It could stop at any of those numbers, that is, steps 1, 2 & 3 are the same thing. Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 04:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
First,I would like to congratulate you for being a wiki editor for 3 years. I want to introduce myself as Monalika,Bangalore,India.I m not a wiki editor.But last week i found that an article on a major engineering institute of my city MSRIT lacked some references(I mean citations).I have added state government,Central government of India,affiliating Universities Newspaper reports,citation links from companies like IBM,Scneider electric,citation from International groups like IEEE,TED . Somewhere last week you have RIGHTLY put a notice that the article lacked citations.So I have put it.Since there were no citations at that moment of time someone even went to the extent of deleting the article.
I humbly request you to check and have a look at the article and say/edit whether it s written properly or not — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.17.118 ( talk) 18:54, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hi, You've worked on a "Edit War" on the Ed Kosiski page [4] before. Would you please revert the latest edit by 174.70.63.4? Additional information is on the talk page: [5] Thank you.
Thanks - and sorry for forgetting the signature. 174.70.63.4 ( talk) 04:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Was updating info on vaccine page....guess it hit highlight all thanks for undoing it also....how do you remove up adds — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.77.216 ( talk) 11:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello and Welcome to the CVUA! Please add yourself to the status page. Thank you, Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 22:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC).
Kangaroo powah 23:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Now that you're officially a member of the CVUA Staff, I just wanted to extend a huge welcome from me, deputy coordinator, as well as Dan653 and Achowat, coordinators. Please watch all pages related the the CVUA (don't forget the Wikipedia Talk pages as well!), and if you see a student you'd like sign up on the enroll page, by all means, snag 'em! Happy editing, and all the best from the crew here. Let us know if you ever have any questions! :) Theopolisme TALK 02:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Pizzighettone has changed its name in U.S. Pergolettese and so the page should be referred to the new page that contains the story of the original club. The previous changes have been made without any consensus and not referenced, they would. http://www.cremaonline.it/articolo.asp?ID=18364 http://www.e-cremonaweb.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1669:si-chiama-pergolettese-1932-soluzione-trovata-grazie-ad-alloni&catid=116:attualita&Itemid=477 -- 93.56.244.167 ( talk) 07:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
The practice in these cases is to make the redirect as in recent cases of A.S. Pro Belvedere Vercelli and G.S. Capriatese; otherwise you have two pages with the same information. -- 93.56.244.167 ( talk) 07:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I can revedelete but not oversight. Such edits are coming daily, especially from around India (this one was from Bangladesh and about Bangladesh) and are typically just reverted. Materialscientist ( talk) 07:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I see you warned the IP about this. In fact, the IP was correct and I'm sorry I didn't fix it earlier. I've sourced it now. Dougweller ( talk) 09:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm not very familiar with editing on Wikipedia and have only recently come to use the messaging system here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeomoonwalker ( talk • contribs) 12:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding. I have read the articles you suggested and I see what you mean. So to be clear, even though this archaeological site was once a cathedral, this does not allow for the near duplication of the title St. Mel's Cathedral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeomoonwalker ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Bgpaulus ( talk) 13:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Replied to two different conversation threads, which have also been changed from sections to sub-sections. Bgpaulus ( talk) 18:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
not sure if usable for Wiki. Interesting historical marker of the land where the water was drawn for the battle.
162.58.82.135 ( talk) 21:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)lostdiver61@yahoo.com
Here is the message: User_talk:Titodutta#July_2012 -- Tito Dutta ✉ 04:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
THE PAGE IN QUESTION IS MY COUSIN AND IM TRYING TO CORRECT IT SHINA RAMBO WAS NEVER A BANDIT HE IS ABOUT 20 YEARS OLD SO HOW CAN HE BE BORN IN THE 60S — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toluaina ( talk • contribs) 13:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Refers to Action Theater Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
My edit to the acion theater WAS NOT vandalism i put it there for informational perposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.172.135.130 ( talk) 13:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Alright Ill find a source 24.172.135.130 ( talk) 14:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Here i found a source but i dont know exactly how to put it in heres the link http://www.themeparktourist.com/news/20120419/6550/kings-islands-dinosaurs-alive-3d-movie-be-free-2012-season 24.172.135.130 ( talk) 14:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for making a great job, and Thank you for the Invitation to the
Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy
I'm really appriciate your activities today.
МаксФрад (
talk)
16:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Valenciano ( talk) 17:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure but the page keeps getting reverted to a former version by you even though the information is out of date please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobbyCU ( talk • contribs) 06:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I think I follow you, I dropped all the external links is it okay now. The information is as accurate as I know. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
RobbyCU (
talk •
contribs)
06:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I do not agree with you removing a valuable link for people looking for pricing, standards and additional information.
I contributed far more to this article than one external link that provides valuable insights into this subject.
This link follows Wikipedia guidelines and is in the proper section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senordiamond ( talk • contribs) 06:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm sure you didn't intend to restore a bad revision with this edit. I made the same mistake, as well, so I thought you'd like to know just so you can be more careful in the future. Cheers! Evanh2008 ( talk| contribs) 07:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I havent even thought about using one of those tools. I'm going to request for permission to use rollback :) Oz talk 10:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Bte99 ( talk) 14:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
If I enrol what does it mean? What do you do? I have been attacked by another user for 'trolling' does my edit history look like trolling? As if it does I may wait a bit longer until I enrol. Please reply. TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud ( talk) 15:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I semi-protected this BLP per your request at WP:RFPP. What template would you like to add? Bearian ( talk) 19:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Callanecc,
thanks for the invitation, I controll at a daily basis the pages I've ever made contibution to. but I do not have any clue what you mean with your invitation. I quess it will take some serious study too. Up to now I did "some" work on the Fukushima nuclear disaster and some related pages in this field. Actually my main interest is lying in the field of typography printing and printing machines, especially casting lead character. But for this there's is not much time left... At the moment some serious printing needs to be done...
But... what are you offering ? and where would I get the information, without making it a daytime job ?
best wishes 1947enkidu ( talk) 05:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
For catching and AIV-ing that vandal at Hosni Mubarak. I appreciate it! Evanh2008 ( talk| contribs) 06:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Callanecc, if I am right: you will change the title from M. Walter Pesman to Michiel Pesman? Kind regards, FKvS ( talk) 13:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hope I didn't throw a monkey wrench into the works! I won't comment on the matter. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 08:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Thought you might want to see this. Don't understand it myself, so did not revert. No need to reply. Special:Contributions/137.166.152.101 Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 09:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
There is some serious sock puppetry going on with those IP'S on this article, any idea who sock puppeteer is? TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud ( talk) 12:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I wrote this at 11.30 last night on an iPod, so please excuse any wackiness. Theopolisme TALK 13:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I think 1.39.20.114 and 112.79.137.193 because they made the exact same edit here 76.26.179.26 ( talk) 15:21, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I see you signed for the Wiki I created for speedy deletion. The Wiki was meant as a page for any independent running for Florida Governor 2014 to be able to sign up on.
May I ask why you did so? I feel you did so saying it was redundant. Yet I see no pages allowing any independents to have their name listed in a wiki for the Florida Governor 2014. When I tried to edit a page to allow Florida Independents to be listed the editor threatened to ban me from Wiki edits for doing so. ( This on a page that has links to Tim Tebow in the polls for Florida Governor... yet he isn't running for Governor of Florida and he has obviously no place on the page, so why is he listed on the page and that is ok?
Thank you in advance for your reply.
Dnblumberg ( talk) 15:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
"Talkbacks are fun because they're spammy. That's why." Enjoy! XD Theopolisme TALK 03:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
You may want to see the discussion on my talk page, this discussion at TT:PROD, and the resultant AfD. As I am also sure it will be an issue, it's a perfectly valid question, I just thought you might like some "light reading". Cheers, -- kelapstick( bainuu) 06:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
I did the levels 3, 4, and 4im warnings. Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 00:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Oops, missed that, sorry. Dougweller ( talk) 20:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Left response to your Talk on my talk page.
talkback template added by User:7kingis
Hi, I have not rejected your application for AWB. It is just when I looked at your contributions I did not see enough yet of what you do non automated. If you want to hurry up my consideration, perhaps you can find a toolserver or otherwise report that shows your non-automated (+non rollback) edits so that I can take a quick look. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Left another...
Excuse me, could you add image "Keke-keke-palmer-7228404-816-1222.jpg" into Commons? It's available only in English Wikipedia. 62.121.114.109
The evidence page doesn't exist. Besides, I don't even know what I'm doing wrong. What if I want another username? So what? That's my decision. I feel very uncomfortable with all this evidence and sockpuppet stuff. Checking people's contribution history for evidence counts as stalking. Please stop. Just because I didn't contribute as TheUserPageRecreator right away doesn't mean I won't contribute. Also, my friend, a Wikipedia expert, told me that the pages were deleted for a reason, so now I know. Heymister14 ( talk) 13:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)heymister14
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ProfessorJane. Dougweller ( talk) 16:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
J (t) 15:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Confirmation of registration request for the Account Creation Interface. Confirmation of identity link: [6]. Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:24, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
...to the Rollbackers and Reviewers Cabal by Jeffwang! Join now! -- J (t) 16:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I talked with Maryana and we can definitely help out with these templates. These kind of warnings is something we gathered a lot of data about, and if it's okay, I'll be bold in proposing versions that will work well based on that data. Thanks for reaching out, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
I have replied to your messages on my talk page. JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:H. G. Wells. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I was fooled by the recent vandalism, didn't look back in the history far enough, and tagged the article for speedy deletion (a mistake - aaaarrrggh). I've reverted the article back to a clean version, but do I need to do more to "un-request" the deletion? -- Bgpaulus ( talk) 15:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Note:Kitten already moved to User:Callanecc/Awards. 17:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hehe, thanks for the congrats/friendly words/etc. I'll try my best!
Theopolisme
TALK
16:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've taken the above user, if you don't mind! However, I was wondering if you could help me out. On Saturdays and Friday evening, I'm not really that active. If you could 'look after them' at those times, say between 18:00 hours on Friday to around 20:00 hours on Saturday, BST, it would really be appreciated. I don't want you to go without. -- Chip123456 Talk Contribs 18:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Would you take a look the article on Sandra Fluke. There is an on going discussion Here on her bio. I just would like to see if I am way off base for thinking the sources I have is good enough for including in her bio. Casprings ( talk) 23:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Re Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#List_of_unreleased_Lana_Del_Rey_songs_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29, I didn't add a symbol since I thought another admin could have a look at it. Thank you, Drmies ( talk) 04:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Listen, you don't know Ryan. I do. His page paints a completely one-sided view of him. Yes, he won a Pulitzer, but he also squatted in an apartment for two months, costing his roommate $1000, which with a reasonable rate of interest would run somewhere near $1500 a decade later. I didn't mention the specifics, as I am a gentleman. But who are you to dispute facts that you have no knowledge of? How about you stick to articles on which you have some shred of knowledge? I don't mean to denigrate you as an editor, but with the articles I read with opinions and godawful grammar, how about you go fix some of them instead of altering changes made in good faith in which the facts are not in dispute? Why are you out to protect the perpetrators instead of the victims?
Wikipedia has jumped the shark. It used to be democratic, now it is an oligarchy. Ass. unsigned comment by 76.102.237.234 ( talk · contribs)
Hey all!
So, big news this week - on Tuesday, we ramped up to 5 percent of articles :). There's been a lot more feedback (pardon the pun) as I'm sure you've noticed, and to try and help we've scheduled a large number of office hours sessions, including one this evening at 22:00 UTC in the #wikimedia-office connect channel, and another at 01:00 UTC for the aussies amongst us :). I hope to see some of you there - if any of you can't make it but have any questions, I'm always happy to help.
Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 20:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Callanecc, thank you for interest in the account creation process. I have verified your Identification [7] and I have approved your request, welcome to the team. You may now access the interface here. Before you do so, please read the account creation guide and our username policy thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process. You should also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect on where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC. Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! mabdul 00:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Someone has removed maintenance templates from Upendra article without solving issues! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 12:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the prompt removal of vandalism from my talk page. Salih (talk) 15:36, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Under which H# criteria does gibberish material fall? benzband ( talk) 17:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Could you please review the recent edits at Redbox and review the recently denied request for semi-protection. I don't understand how someone can introduce clearly personal edits anonymously without discussion and have the protection request denied. 842U ( talk) 19:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
As you're knowing what's happening with this page.What do you think? is there any possibility to semi-protect it ? -Thank You - 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 10:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
I'll not revert this editor's edit agin, as, don't know it may violate 3RR which I don't want, but, I am watching ANI! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 11:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:User pages. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 15:15, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Callanecc! Could you pop onto the IRC for a moment or two? Thanks. Theopolisme TALK 02:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
You can ask your question on my talk page or use email if you like! Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Blumberg, who asked for your assistance back around Bastille Day, has now put out a YouTube video accusing us (by which he means Wikileaks, of course) of getting people tortured and killed, and saying that if we believe in freedom of information strongly enough to get people killed, obviously we should let him spam us! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20WrFZs35RU&feature=plcp -- Orange Mike | Talk 19:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Callanecc, I would like for you to consider the "Matthew Asinari" article. I am currently writing it. However, there are several issues with the article. Other editors claim that my writing is biased and written like an advertisement. However, I don't feel this is the case and fail to see anything in it that explicitly promotes the subject of the article. Could you please be so kind as to give it a look and point me to any sentences that you feel may be responsible for the issue. Additionally, it states that the article is an orphan article. Does wikipedia oppose to making references to the article in other articles to which the subject is involved? Best, Rrajan12321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrajan12321 ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I think that you are well-qualified. Have you thought about running? Electric Catfish 15:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Callanecc, You were trying to help me last night with my article. I have since done two other revisions and I keep getting denied for Copyright information. There is none in my article and no one can help me and tell me what the problem is that I keep getting turned down. The article is Sally Steele (2) and the link I think is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rocksinnerqueen. I am so frustrated after 3 days of constant concentration trying to work on this. Who can I get to help me? Can you or can you refer me to someone? the chat wikipedia help is not working. No one knows what the problem is. Thank you so much. ( Rocksinnerqueen ( talk) 10:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC))
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Williamsburgland ( talk) 17:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Chip 123456 18:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ✉ has invited you a for a plate of spicy Panipuri! Panipuri promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can give someone else a plate of Panipuri to spread Wikilove too! Hope you'll like it
To share a plate of Panipuri, simply add {{
subst:Panipuri}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.
-- Tito Dutta ✉ 18:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Moved to User:Callanecc/Awards 03:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for cleaning up my user page! Ebikeguy ( talk) 15:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC) |
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Kurdo, I don't understand why you are reverting. For example, in this example it is a quote from a reliable source so there is no reason to remove it, WP:BLP does not apply to notable (which I believe this is) things which are reliably sourced (which this is). It may be that I'm missing something so would you mind enlightening me? Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 05:55, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Above is my comment made on user's talk page Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
![]() |
Tired after doing manual talk page archiving (to 2011 and 2012 archives)? Here is a cup of tea! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 02:57, 27 July 2012 (UTC) |
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
For last few days I have been investigating how my deleted edit count suddenly increased from 144 to 150 suddenly? I have solved the puzzle now. You deleted this page, as a result, my edits also got deleted! Very (b/s)ad! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 03:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hi there Callanecc - thanks for asking a question at my RfA. I'm a little confused by the first sentence, do you think you can clarify it (perhaps it's just a grammar or word use): "An IP user completely changes a large section of a non-BLP article on a living from being unreferenced to completely referenced." The part in italics is what I'm confused by. Thanks! Sarah ( talk) 16:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for answering Sarah, I have a few follow-up questions and I'd like the tease out a few points. Do you mind if I do it here (rather than clogging up your talk page or the RFA talk page)? Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 32 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
On this topic: Apparently it's a good question, because you get varied responses. And Sarah's solid answer is what I'd expect from a teahouse kind of person. :-) ("I thought she was an admin already!").
But I love puzzles, and I can't resist providing my own question/answer: I love strategic minimum actions. What if all one were to do would be to rollback the rollbacker? What would happen next? -- Kim Bruning ( talk) 15:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC) I can think of at least 2 diverging paths resulting from that action, with various options for more or less desirable actions along the way. What do you predict will happen?
Well they would get an oppose vote from me (and probably quite a few others). I can see couple of diverging paths:
*It is how it played out, but I also think at that point the rollbacker might be a little too caught in the moment to think about what's happening.
Although it seems that scenario has a lot of steps, it really doesn't, I've just worked the thing through until there was no where else to a stop. It could stop at any of those numbers, that is, steps 1, 2 & 3 are the same thing. Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 04:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
First,I would like to congratulate you for being a wiki editor for 3 years. I want to introduce myself as Monalika,Bangalore,India.I m not a wiki editor.But last week i found that an article on a major engineering institute of my city MSRIT lacked some references(I mean citations).I have added state government,Central government of India,affiliating Universities Newspaper reports,citation links from companies like IBM,Scneider electric,citation from International groups like IEEE,TED . Somewhere last week you have RIGHTLY put a notice that the article lacked citations.So I have put it.Since there were no citations at that moment of time someone even went to the extent of deleting the article.
I humbly request you to check and have a look at the article and say/edit whether it s written properly or not — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.17.118 ( talk) 18:54, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hi, You've worked on a "Edit War" on the Ed Kosiski page [1] before. Would you please revert the latest edit by 174.70.63.4? Additional information is on the talk page: [2] Thank you.
Thanks - and sorry for forgetting the signature. 174.70.63.4 ( talk) 04:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hmm ... on the one hand I am flattered by that expression of trust. I can see the need and see where I could be helpful on the user-renaming end. But ... it does also include closing RFAs, and I don't have a lot of experience hanging out there (which might be a plus). I just worry about the time it might take.
I see you have persuaded at least Beeblebrox and someone else to go for it. Let's see how that goes. Give it a month or so more and I might be interested.
(Sorry I didn't get more of a chance to talk to you at Wikimania). Daniel Case ( talk) 20:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, my brain does not seem to be wired up for real editing. I suspect I am destined to be a life-long Huggle jockey. I might try writing tools, I've written tons of code. Thanks for the inspiration! Jim1138 ( talk) 09:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I was not attacking, i just have a VERY strong opinion that the article is still VERY POV and that the title of the article is WONG and does not stand up to the pillars. I expressed my opinion very strongly to make a point. Aperseghin ( talk) 13:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
On this topic: Apparently it's a good question, because you get varied responses. And Sarah's solid answer is what I'd expect from a teahouse kind of person. :-) ("I thought she was an admin already!").
But I love puzzles, and I can't resist providing my own question/answer: I love strategic minimum actions. What if all one were to do would be to rollback the rollbacker? What would happen next? -- Kim Bruning ( talk) 15:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC) I can think of at least 2 diverging paths resulting from that action, with various options for more or less desirable actions along the way. What do you predict will happen?
Well they would get an oppose vote from me (and probably quite a few others). I can see couple of diverging paths:
*It is how it played out, but I also think at that point the rollbacker might be a little too caught in the moment to think about what's happening.
Although it seems that scenario has a lot of steps, it really doesn't, I've just worked the thing through until there was no where else to a stop. It could stop at any of those numbers, that is, steps 1, 2 & 3 are the same thing. Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 04:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
First,I would like to congratulate you for being a wiki editor for 3 years. I want to introduce myself as Monalika,Bangalore,India.I m not a wiki editor.But last week i found that an article on a major engineering institute of my city MSRIT lacked some references(I mean citations).I have added state government,Central government of India,affiliating Universities Newspaper reports,citation links from companies like IBM,Scneider electric,citation from International groups like IEEE,TED . Somewhere last week you have RIGHTLY put a notice that the article lacked citations.So I have put it.Since there were no citations at that moment of time someone even went to the extent of deleting the article.
I humbly request you to check and have a look at the article and say/edit whether it s written properly or not — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.17.118 ( talk) 18:54, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hi, You've worked on a "Edit War" on the Ed Kosiski page [4] before. Would you please revert the latest edit by 174.70.63.4? Additional information is on the talk page: [5] Thank you.
Thanks - and sorry for forgetting the signature. 174.70.63.4 ( talk) 04:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Was updating info on vaccine page....guess it hit highlight all thanks for undoing it also....how do you remove up adds — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.77.216 ( talk) 11:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello and Welcome to the CVUA! Please add yourself to the status page. Thank you, Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 22:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC).
Kangaroo powah 23:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Now that you're officially a member of the CVUA Staff, I just wanted to extend a huge welcome from me, deputy coordinator, as well as Dan653 and Achowat, coordinators. Please watch all pages related the the CVUA (don't forget the Wikipedia Talk pages as well!), and if you see a student you'd like sign up on the enroll page, by all means, snag 'em! Happy editing, and all the best from the crew here. Let us know if you ever have any questions! :) Theopolisme TALK 02:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Pizzighettone has changed its name in U.S. Pergolettese and so the page should be referred to the new page that contains the story of the original club. The previous changes have been made without any consensus and not referenced, they would. http://www.cremaonline.it/articolo.asp?ID=18364 http://www.e-cremonaweb.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1669:si-chiama-pergolettese-1932-soluzione-trovata-grazie-ad-alloni&catid=116:attualita&Itemid=477 -- 93.56.244.167 ( talk) 07:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
The practice in these cases is to make the redirect as in recent cases of A.S. Pro Belvedere Vercelli and G.S. Capriatese; otherwise you have two pages with the same information. -- 93.56.244.167 ( talk) 07:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I can revedelete but not oversight. Such edits are coming daily, especially from around India (this one was from Bangladesh and about Bangladesh) and are typically just reverted. Materialscientist ( talk) 07:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I see you warned the IP about this. In fact, the IP was correct and I'm sorry I didn't fix it earlier. I've sourced it now. Dougweller ( talk) 09:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm not very familiar with editing on Wikipedia and have only recently come to use the messaging system here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeomoonwalker ( talk • contribs) 12:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding. I have read the articles you suggested and I see what you mean. So to be clear, even though this archaeological site was once a cathedral, this does not allow for the near duplication of the title St. Mel's Cathedral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeomoonwalker ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Bgpaulus ( talk) 13:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Replied to two different conversation threads, which have also been changed from sections to sub-sections. Bgpaulus ( talk) 18:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
not sure if usable for Wiki. Interesting historical marker of the land where the water was drawn for the battle.
162.58.82.135 ( talk) 21:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)lostdiver61@yahoo.com
Here is the message: User_talk:Titodutta#July_2012 -- Tito Dutta ✉ 04:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
THE PAGE IN QUESTION IS MY COUSIN AND IM TRYING TO CORRECT IT SHINA RAMBO WAS NEVER A BANDIT HE IS ABOUT 20 YEARS OLD SO HOW CAN HE BE BORN IN THE 60S — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toluaina ( talk • contribs) 13:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Refers to Action Theater Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
My edit to the acion theater WAS NOT vandalism i put it there for informational perposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.172.135.130 ( talk) 13:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Alright Ill find a source 24.172.135.130 ( talk) 14:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Here i found a source but i dont know exactly how to put it in heres the link http://www.themeparktourist.com/news/20120419/6550/kings-islands-dinosaurs-alive-3d-movie-be-free-2012-season 24.172.135.130 ( talk) 14:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for making a great job, and Thank you for the Invitation to the
Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy
I'm really appriciate your activities today.
МаксФрад (
talk)
16:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Valenciano ( talk) 17:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure but the page keeps getting reverted to a former version by you even though the information is out of date please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobbyCU ( talk • contribs) 06:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I think I follow you, I dropped all the external links is it okay now. The information is as accurate as I know. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
RobbyCU (
talk •
contribs)
06:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I do not agree with you removing a valuable link for people looking for pricing, standards and additional information.
I contributed far more to this article than one external link that provides valuable insights into this subject.
This link follows Wikipedia guidelines and is in the proper section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senordiamond ( talk • contribs) 06:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm sure you didn't intend to restore a bad revision with this edit. I made the same mistake, as well, so I thought you'd like to know just so you can be more careful in the future. Cheers! Evanh2008 ( talk| contribs) 07:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I havent even thought about using one of those tools. I'm going to request for permission to use rollback :) Oz talk 10:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Bte99 ( talk) 14:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
If I enrol what does it mean? What do you do? I have been attacked by another user for 'trolling' does my edit history look like trolling? As if it does I may wait a bit longer until I enrol. Please reply. TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud ( talk) 15:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I semi-protected this BLP per your request at WP:RFPP. What template would you like to add? Bearian ( talk) 19:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Callanecc,
thanks for the invitation, I controll at a daily basis the pages I've ever made contibution to. but I do not have any clue what you mean with your invitation. I quess it will take some serious study too. Up to now I did "some" work on the Fukushima nuclear disaster and some related pages in this field. Actually my main interest is lying in the field of typography printing and printing machines, especially casting lead character. But for this there's is not much time left... At the moment some serious printing needs to be done...
But... what are you offering ? and where would I get the information, without making it a daytime job ?
best wishes 1947enkidu ( talk) 05:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
For catching and AIV-ing that vandal at Hosni Mubarak. I appreciate it! Evanh2008 ( talk| contribs) 06:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Callanecc, if I am right: you will change the title from M. Walter Pesman to Michiel Pesman? Kind regards, FKvS ( talk) 13:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hope I didn't throw a monkey wrench into the works! I won't comment on the matter. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 08:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Thought you might want to see this. Don't understand it myself, so did not revert. No need to reply. Special:Contributions/137.166.152.101 Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 09:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
There is some serious sock puppetry going on with those IP'S on this article, any idea who sock puppeteer is? TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud ( talk) 12:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I wrote this at 11.30 last night on an iPod, so please excuse any wackiness. Theopolisme TALK 13:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I think 1.39.20.114 and 112.79.137.193 because they made the exact same edit here 76.26.179.26 ( talk) 15:21, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I see you signed for the Wiki I created for speedy deletion. The Wiki was meant as a page for any independent running for Florida Governor 2014 to be able to sign up on.
May I ask why you did so? I feel you did so saying it was redundant. Yet I see no pages allowing any independents to have their name listed in a wiki for the Florida Governor 2014. When I tried to edit a page to allow Florida Independents to be listed the editor threatened to ban me from Wiki edits for doing so. ( This on a page that has links to Tim Tebow in the polls for Florida Governor... yet he isn't running for Governor of Florida and he has obviously no place on the page, so why is he listed on the page and that is ok?
Thank you in advance for your reply.
Dnblumberg ( talk) 15:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
"Talkbacks are fun because they're spammy. That's why." Enjoy! XD Theopolisme TALK 03:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
You may want to see the discussion on my talk page, this discussion at TT:PROD, and the resultant AfD. As I am also sure it will be an issue, it's a perfectly valid question, I just thought you might like some "light reading". Cheers, -- kelapstick( bainuu) 06:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
I did the levels 3, 4, and 4im warnings. Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 00:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Oops, missed that, sorry. Dougweller ( talk) 20:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Left response to your Talk on my talk page.
talkback template added by User:7kingis
Hi, I have not rejected your application for AWB. It is just when I looked at your contributions I did not see enough yet of what you do non automated. If you want to hurry up my consideration, perhaps you can find a toolserver or otherwise report that shows your non-automated (+non rollback) edits so that I can take a quick look. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Left another...
Excuse me, could you add image "Keke-keke-palmer-7228404-816-1222.jpg" into Commons? It's available only in English Wikipedia. 62.121.114.109
The evidence page doesn't exist. Besides, I don't even know what I'm doing wrong. What if I want another username? So what? That's my decision. I feel very uncomfortable with all this evidence and sockpuppet stuff. Checking people's contribution history for evidence counts as stalking. Please stop. Just because I didn't contribute as TheUserPageRecreator right away doesn't mean I won't contribute. Also, my friend, a Wikipedia expert, told me that the pages were deleted for a reason, so now I know. Heymister14 ( talk) 13:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)heymister14
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ProfessorJane. Dougweller ( talk) 16:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
J (t) 15:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Confirmation of registration request for the Account Creation Interface. Confirmation of identity link: [6]. Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:24, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
...to the Rollbackers and Reviewers Cabal by Jeffwang! Join now! -- J (t) 16:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I talked with Maryana and we can definitely help out with these templates. These kind of warnings is something we gathered a lot of data about, and if it's okay, I'll be bold in proposing versions that will work well based on that data. Thanks for reaching out, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
I have replied to your messages on my talk page. JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:H. G. Wells. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I was fooled by the recent vandalism, didn't look back in the history far enough, and tagged the article for speedy deletion (a mistake - aaaarrrggh). I've reverted the article back to a clean version, but do I need to do more to "un-request" the deletion? -- Bgpaulus ( talk) 15:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Note:Kitten already moved to User:Callanecc/Awards. 17:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hehe, thanks for the congrats/friendly words/etc. I'll try my best!
Theopolisme
TALK
16:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've taken the above user, if you don't mind! However, I was wondering if you could help me out. On Saturdays and Friday evening, I'm not really that active. If you could 'look after them' at those times, say between 18:00 hours on Friday to around 20:00 hours on Saturday, BST, it would really be appreciated. I don't want you to go without. -- Chip123456 Talk Contribs 18:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Would you take a look the article on Sandra Fluke. There is an on going discussion Here on her bio. I just would like to see if I am way off base for thinking the sources I have is good enough for including in her bio. Casprings ( talk) 23:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Re Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#List_of_unreleased_Lana_Del_Rey_songs_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29, I didn't add a symbol since I thought another admin could have a look at it. Thank you, Drmies ( talk) 04:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Listen, you don't know Ryan. I do. His page paints a completely one-sided view of him. Yes, he won a Pulitzer, but he also squatted in an apartment for two months, costing his roommate $1000, which with a reasonable rate of interest would run somewhere near $1500 a decade later. I didn't mention the specifics, as I am a gentleman. But who are you to dispute facts that you have no knowledge of? How about you stick to articles on which you have some shred of knowledge? I don't mean to denigrate you as an editor, but with the articles I read with opinions and godawful grammar, how about you go fix some of them instead of altering changes made in good faith in which the facts are not in dispute? Why are you out to protect the perpetrators instead of the victims?
Wikipedia has jumped the shark. It used to be democratic, now it is an oligarchy. Ass. unsigned comment by 76.102.237.234 ( talk · contribs)
Hey all!
So, big news this week - on Tuesday, we ramped up to 5 percent of articles :). There's been a lot more feedback (pardon the pun) as I'm sure you've noticed, and to try and help we've scheduled a large number of office hours sessions, including one this evening at 22:00 UTC in the #wikimedia-office connect channel, and another at 01:00 UTC for the aussies amongst us :). I hope to see some of you there - if any of you can't make it but have any questions, I'm always happy to help.
Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 20:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Callanecc, thank you for interest in the account creation process. I have verified your Identification [7] and I have approved your request, welcome to the team. You may now access the interface here. Before you do so, please read the account creation guide and our username policy thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process. You should also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect on where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC. Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! mabdul 00:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Someone has removed maintenance templates from Upendra article without solving issues! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 12:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the prompt removal of vandalism from my talk page. Salih (talk) 15:36, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Under which H# criteria does gibberish material fall? benzband ( talk) 17:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Could you please review the recent edits at Redbox and review the recently denied request for semi-protection. I don't understand how someone can introduce clearly personal edits anonymously without discussion and have the protection request denied. 842U ( talk) 19:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
As you're knowing what's happening with this page.What do you think? is there any possibility to semi-protect it ? -Thank You - 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 10:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
I'll not revert this editor's edit agin, as, don't know it may violate 3RR which I don't want, but, I am watching ANI! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 11:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:User pages. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 15:15, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Callanecc! Could you pop onto the IRC for a moment or two? Thanks. Theopolisme TALK 02:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
You can ask your question on my talk page or use email if you like! Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Blumberg, who asked for your assistance back around Bastille Day, has now put out a YouTube video accusing us (by which he means Wikileaks, of course) of getting people tortured and killed, and saying that if we believe in freedom of information strongly enough to get people killed, obviously we should let him spam us! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20WrFZs35RU&feature=plcp -- Orange Mike | Talk 19:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Callanecc, I would like for you to consider the "Matthew Asinari" article. I am currently writing it. However, there are several issues with the article. Other editors claim that my writing is biased and written like an advertisement. However, I don't feel this is the case and fail to see anything in it that explicitly promotes the subject of the article. Could you please be so kind as to give it a look and point me to any sentences that you feel may be responsible for the issue. Additionally, it states that the article is an orphan article. Does wikipedia oppose to making references to the article in other articles to which the subject is involved? Best, Rrajan12321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrajan12321 ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I think that you are well-qualified. Have you thought about running? Electric Catfish 15:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Callanecc, You were trying to help me last night with my article. I have since done two other revisions and I keep getting denied for Copyright information. There is none in my article and no one can help me and tell me what the problem is that I keep getting turned down. The article is Sally Steele (2) and the link I think is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rocksinnerqueen. I am so frustrated after 3 days of constant concentration trying to work on this. Who can I get to help me? Can you or can you refer me to someone? the chat wikipedia help is not working. No one knows what the problem is. Thank you so much. ( Rocksinnerqueen ( talk) 10:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC))
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Williamsburgland ( talk) 17:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Chip 123456 18:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ✉ has invited you a for a plate of spicy Panipuri! Panipuri promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can give someone else a plate of Panipuri to spread Wikilove too! Hope you'll like it
To share a plate of Panipuri, simply add {{
subst:Panipuri}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.
-- Tito Dutta ✉ 18:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Moved to User:Callanecc/Awards 03:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for cleaning up my user page! Ebikeguy ( talk) 15:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC) |
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Kurdo, I don't understand why you are reverting. For example, in this example it is a quote from a reliable source so there is no reason to remove it, WP:BLP does not apply to notable (which I believe this is) things which are reliably sourced (which this is). It may be that I'm missing something so would you mind enlightening me? Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 05:55, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Above is my comment made on user's talk page Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
![]() |
Tired after doing manual talk page archiving (to 2011 and 2012 archives)? Here is a cup of tea! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 02:57, 27 July 2012 (UTC) |
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
For last few days I have been investigating how my deleted edit count suddenly increased from 144 to 150 suddenly? I have solved the puzzle now. You deleted this page, as a result, my edits also got deleted! Very (b/s)ad! -- Tito Dutta ✉ 03:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hi there Callanecc - thanks for asking a question at my RfA. I'm a little confused by the first sentence, do you think you can clarify it (perhaps it's just a grammar or word use): "An IP user completely changes a large section of a non-BLP article on a living from being unreferenced to completely referenced." The part in italics is what I'm confused by. Thanks! Sarah ( talk) 16:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for answering Sarah, I have a few follow-up questions and I'd like the tease out a few points. Do you mind if I do it here (rather than clogging up your talk page or the RFA talk page)? Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)