This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You deleted a paragraph from the body, saying "none of this paragraph is about Passienus". However, it was describing what happened to Passienus' wife and stepson in the sequence of events that included Agrippina's betrayal of Passienus and his death, and which ended with his wife becoming Roman empress and his stepson murdering both her and Passienus' first wife... this seems reasonably related to Passienus. It describes how he fits into one of the most scandalous careers in Roman history. And it is not excessively long or detailed, as it all fits in one paragraph. I think that it should be restored to the article, and therefore urge you to reconsider its deletion. P Aculeius ( talk) 11:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
The winners of the 2023 The Core Contest are announced 🎉. We had an amazing set of improvements this year, and the judges ( Femke, Aza24 and Casliber) would like to thank everybody who joined and congratulate the winners.
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list. —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 20:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Caeciliusinhorto,
I just wanted to remind you that whenever you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), it is considered best practice to post a notification on the talk page for the page creator. This is done most easily when you use Twinkle, and editing tool, to tag pages for deletion or for any problems they contain that need to be fixed. Twinkle is a very useful tool for all editors to try out and it can do everything from post Welcome messages to set up an AFD discussion or report a vandal to a noticeboard. Basically, it remembers all of those templates so that you do not have to memorize them or spend time trying to find the right one. Best of all, once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post those talk page notices on your behalf. It's very convenient to use so I encourage you to try it out. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
A Helping Hand | |
Caeciliusinhorto, I would like to thank you very much for reviewing my article. You have spent a great deal of time working with me and I appreciate this. Not only were you patient, but I appreciated the fact you really put me through my paces and left nothing without scrutiny. While sometimes a quick review is nice, thorough reviews are invaluable. I feel I learned a lot about polishing the chrome by really eliminating any unnecessary information from an article, to keep it tight, succinct, clear, and unquestionably verifiable from the sources. I learned lessons. Thank you. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC) |
The proposed decision for the AlisonW case has been posted. Statements regarding the proposed decision are welcome at the talk page. Please note that comments must be made in your own section. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedy has been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Seven years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
If you have a moment, would you be willing to cast an eye on the peer review for Temple of Apollo Palatinus? I think it would really benefit from some classicist input: in particular, there's a lot of background as to Augustus' building programme and relationship with Apollo, and I'm keen to make sure I've struck the right balance between keeping the focus on the subject and giving enough explanation of the background. UndercoverClassicist ( talk) 07:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Caeciliusinhorto, I hope you're well. You may recall that I contributed a music section to the article on Sappho late last year. I wondered if you had any plans to bring the article to FA? – Aza24 (talk) 06:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature. Camillo Neri's bibliography for his 2022 critical edition of Sappho runs to 70 pages in fairly small print; there's a lot of relevant literature to survey!
I understand your point of removing the phrase about the zapatist's use of the watch, but other sources that talk about this watch also mention the zapatists, like this one by Vice [ https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkebp8/casio-f91w-watch-terrorists-ied-trigger-cost-price Why Terrorists Love Casio's Iconic F-91W Watch]. Maybe the lead could contain a passing mention to it, without referring to Marcos in particular. JoaquimCebuano ( talk) 18:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Caeciliusinhorto:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
At the time I left the "Clarify" tag, the word was "Current"! Another editor addressed the issue but left the tag. Pam D 16:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments on the talk page. Note that SchmiAlf has replied, would appreciate if you had any response to his reply. Ilenart626 ( talk) 23:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Regarding the death notice you replied to, it rang an alarm bell with me so I've redacted the section and emailed Trust and Safety. However, you didn't go anything wrong! Fences& Windows 11:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, in this edit to Agnodice you introduced {{sfn|Parker|2016|p=252}} however no such work is listed. This means that nobody can look up the reference, and adds the article to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could supply the missing sorce that would be great. DuncanHill ( talk) 18:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Venus de Milo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ppt91 -- Ppt91 ( talk) 19:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | |||
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
Krampus!
|
Hi, I came across your page while looking at the Aineta aryballos GA review. I must say, I am amazed at the level of edits you have made. Personally I've been very interested in Greek & Roman topics, archaeology in particular, but never had access to the required resources (can't access TWL too). Now when I've introduced myself, could I please request you to consider doing a GA review for the article on Rajiv Malhotra which I nominated? I believe it is GA worthy, perhaps even FA worthy, with a great level of detail. It was rated C a long time ago, hasn't been reassessed and many good edits have been made since then. If you don't have the time, that is understandable too. I also asked the user UndercoverClassicist but received no response. Thanks in advance. Matarisvan ( talk) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
P Aculeius (
talk) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Xmas,
Eid,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Robin}} to your friends' talk pages.
P Aculeius ( talk) 13:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
FYI, this script semi-automates the setting up of a GA reassessment, although you subsequently have to notify the involved WikiProjects manually. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 20:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sappho: A New Translation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist ( talk) 18:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about my edits to the above. On reading the article, I noticed that there was a mix of Br & AM English. As the article uses dmy dates, I assumed that Br English was more correct and also it is not an American-related article. Again, sorry. Best Regards Denisarona ( talk) 16:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Do you think Alcaeus should redirect to Alcaeus of Mytilene with a hatnote? The other three ( Alcaeus (comic poet), Alcaeus of Messene, Alcaeus and Philiscus) seem sparsely notable. Thinking about starting a move request Aza24 (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi! Can you please add to the description of this your pictures[ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Venus_de_Milo_(possibly_missing_parts)] the location. Are items in Louvre? Or other place? Permanent exhibition or temporary? What exactly the museum labels said? Thanks! -- Shakko ( talk) 11:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PenmanWarrior ( talk) 18:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
N-grams for Horn Dance and Addobt Bromley Horn Dance, thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 12:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You deleted a paragraph from the body, saying "none of this paragraph is about Passienus". However, it was describing what happened to Passienus' wife and stepson in the sequence of events that included Agrippina's betrayal of Passienus and his death, and which ended with his wife becoming Roman empress and his stepson murdering both her and Passienus' first wife... this seems reasonably related to Passienus. It describes how he fits into one of the most scandalous careers in Roman history. And it is not excessively long or detailed, as it all fits in one paragraph. I think that it should be restored to the article, and therefore urge you to reconsider its deletion. P Aculeius ( talk) 11:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
The winners of the 2023 The Core Contest are announced 🎉. We had an amazing set of improvements this year, and the judges ( Femke, Aza24 and Casliber) would like to thank everybody who joined and congratulate the winners.
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list. —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 20:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Caeciliusinhorto,
I just wanted to remind you that whenever you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), it is considered best practice to post a notification on the talk page for the page creator. This is done most easily when you use Twinkle, and editing tool, to tag pages for deletion or for any problems they contain that need to be fixed. Twinkle is a very useful tool for all editors to try out and it can do everything from post Welcome messages to set up an AFD discussion or report a vandal to a noticeboard. Basically, it remembers all of those templates so that you do not have to memorize them or spend time trying to find the right one. Best of all, once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post those talk page notices on your behalf. It's very convenient to use so I encourage you to try it out. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
A Helping Hand | |
Caeciliusinhorto, I would like to thank you very much for reviewing my article. You have spent a great deal of time working with me and I appreciate this. Not only were you patient, but I appreciated the fact you really put me through my paces and left nothing without scrutiny. While sometimes a quick review is nice, thorough reviews are invaluable. I feel I learned a lot about polishing the chrome by really eliminating any unnecessary information from an article, to keep it tight, succinct, clear, and unquestionably verifiable from the sources. I learned lessons. Thank you. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC) |
The proposed decision for the AlisonW case has been posted. Statements regarding the proposed decision are welcome at the talk page. Please note that comments must be made in your own section. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedy has been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Seven years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
If you have a moment, would you be willing to cast an eye on the peer review for Temple of Apollo Palatinus? I think it would really benefit from some classicist input: in particular, there's a lot of background as to Augustus' building programme and relationship with Apollo, and I'm keen to make sure I've struck the right balance between keeping the focus on the subject and giving enough explanation of the background. UndercoverClassicist ( talk) 07:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Caeciliusinhorto, I hope you're well. You may recall that I contributed a music section to the article on Sappho late last year. I wondered if you had any plans to bring the article to FA? – Aza24 (talk) 06:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature. Camillo Neri's bibliography for his 2022 critical edition of Sappho runs to 70 pages in fairly small print; there's a lot of relevant literature to survey!
I understand your point of removing the phrase about the zapatist's use of the watch, but other sources that talk about this watch also mention the zapatists, like this one by Vice [ https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkebp8/casio-f91w-watch-terrorists-ied-trigger-cost-price Why Terrorists Love Casio's Iconic F-91W Watch]. Maybe the lead could contain a passing mention to it, without referring to Marcos in particular. JoaquimCebuano ( talk) 18:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Caeciliusinhorto:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long
Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave ( talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
At the time I left the "Clarify" tag, the word was "Current"! Another editor addressed the issue but left the tag. Pam D 16:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments on the talk page. Note that SchmiAlf has replied, would appreciate if you had any response to his reply. Ilenart626 ( talk) 23:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Regarding the death notice you replied to, it rang an alarm bell with me so I've redacted the section and emailed Trust and Safety. However, you didn't go anything wrong! Fences& Windows 11:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, in this edit to Agnodice you introduced {{sfn|Parker|2016|p=252}} however no such work is listed. This means that nobody can look up the reference, and adds the article to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could supply the missing sorce that would be great. DuncanHill ( talk) 18:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Venus de Milo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ppt91 -- Ppt91 ( talk) 19:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | |||
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
Krampus!
|
Hi, I came across your page while looking at the Aineta aryballos GA review. I must say, I am amazed at the level of edits you have made. Personally I've been very interested in Greek & Roman topics, archaeology in particular, but never had access to the required resources (can't access TWL too). Now when I've introduced myself, could I please request you to consider doing a GA review for the article on Rajiv Malhotra which I nominated? I believe it is GA worthy, perhaps even FA worthy, with a great level of detail. It was rated C a long time ago, hasn't been reassessed and many good edits have been made since then. If you don't have the time, that is understandable too. I also asked the user UndercoverClassicist but received no response. Thanks in advance. Matarisvan ( talk) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
P Aculeius (
talk) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Xmas,
Eid,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Robin}} to your friends' talk pages.
P Aculeius ( talk) 13:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
FYI, this script semi-automates the setting up of a GA reassessment, although you subsequently have to notify the involved WikiProjects manually. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 20:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sappho: A New Translation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist ( talk) 18:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about my edits to the above. On reading the article, I noticed that there was a mix of Br & AM English. As the article uses dmy dates, I assumed that Br English was more correct and also it is not an American-related article. Again, sorry. Best Regards Denisarona ( talk) 16:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Do you think Alcaeus should redirect to Alcaeus of Mytilene with a hatnote? The other three ( Alcaeus (comic poet), Alcaeus of Messene, Alcaeus and Philiscus) seem sparsely notable. Thinking about starting a move request Aza24 (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi! Can you please add to the description of this your pictures[ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Venus_de_Milo_(possibly_missing_parts)] the location. Are items in Louvre? Or other place? Permanent exhibition or temporary? What exactly the museum labels said? Thanks! -- Shakko ( talk) 11:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PenmanWarrior ( talk) 18:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
N-grams for Horn Dance and Addobt Bromley Horn Dance, thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 12:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)