Hi CabOffice01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Pratyya (have a chat?) 06:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
The inexperienced reviewer should not have accepted this article. As reviewing administrator, I have deleted it under provision CSD G11, blatant promotion that can not be rescued by normal editing. A factual article about the department not devoted to government propaganda, not claiming great successes everywhere they has been working, not written in bureaucratic jargon, and not trying to include the names of as many minor officials as possible, might be acceptable. Someone not connected with Government ought to write it. DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may
appeal this username block by adding the text {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our
username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{
unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice instead. Thank you.
DGG (
talk )
02:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi CabOffice01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Pratyya (have a chat?) 06:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
The inexperienced reviewer should not have accepted this article. As reviewing administrator, I have deleted it under provision CSD G11, blatant promotion that can not be rescued by normal editing. A factual article about the department not devoted to government propaganda, not claiming great successes everywhere they has been working, not written in bureaucratic jargon, and not trying to include the names of as many minor officials as possible, might be acceptable. Someone not connected with Government ought to write it. DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may
appeal this username block by adding the text {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our
username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{
unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice instead. Thank you.
DGG (
talk )
02:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)