Welcome!
Hello, CSWP1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called
Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{
help me}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!-- Mishae ( talk) 11:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi CSWP1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Dathus ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC) |
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
List of Palestinians. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Your personal view doesn't trump a source; and "necessary" isn't the test.
Epeefleche (
talk)
03:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.What was your former user name, on the account to which you have lost the password? Were you subject to any editing restrictions? Thanks. RolandR ( talk) 11:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at
Talk:Juliano Mer-Khamis, is considered
bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
RolandR (
talk)
01:47, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Juliano Mer-Khamis. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. RolandR ( talk) 01:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Juliano Mer-Khamis. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. RolandR ( talk) 08:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Juliano Mer-Khamis. Your repeated deletion of reliably sourced material from this article has been reverted by three editors so far. And talk page consensus also disagrees with you. Please do not repeat this disruptive edit.
RolandR (
talk)
14:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Juliano Mer-Khamis.
RolandR (
talk)
21:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
See WP:TPO. You want to complain about it go to ANI and if an admin finds it necessary to remove they can remove it. You however cannot. Stop messing with other peoples comments, it makes you look petulant and childish. Oh no, the big bad meanie insulted me. Grow up. nableezy - 09:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CSWP1 reported by User:RolandR (Result: ). Thank you.
RolandR (
talk)
18:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Swarm
X
22:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Welcome!
Hello, CSWP1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called
Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{
help me}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!-- Mishae ( talk) 11:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi CSWP1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Dathus ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC) |
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
List of Palestinians. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Your personal view doesn't trump a source; and "necessary" isn't the test.
Epeefleche (
talk)
03:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.What was your former user name, on the account to which you have lost the password? Were you subject to any editing restrictions? Thanks. RolandR ( talk) 11:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at
Talk:Juliano Mer-Khamis, is considered
bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
RolandR (
talk)
01:47, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Juliano Mer-Khamis. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. RolandR ( talk) 01:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Juliano Mer-Khamis. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. RolandR ( talk) 08:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Juliano Mer-Khamis. Your repeated deletion of reliably sourced material from this article has been reverted by three editors so far. And talk page consensus also disagrees with you. Please do not repeat this disruptive edit.
RolandR (
talk)
14:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Juliano Mer-Khamis.
RolandR (
talk)
21:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
See WP:TPO. You want to complain about it go to ANI and if an admin finds it necessary to remove they can remove it. You however cannot. Stop messing with other peoples comments, it makes you look petulant and childish. Oh no, the big bad meanie insulted me. Grow up. nableezy - 09:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CSWP1 reported by User:RolandR (Result: ). Thank you.
RolandR (
talk)
18:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Swarm
X
22:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)