Check out what I've been up to. :) BOZ ( talk) 17:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! :)
As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ ( talk) 18:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Regarding your recent two rv on the article, if you read the book then please justify in the talk page why do you think that text in uncessary. Clearly Solomon presented the work of individuals who passed away ( Roger Revelle the prime example), then the book presentation is limited to what he wrote. As you can see in that Talk page, the entire article's content has been discussed, and such changes required a discussion. Also, did you notice there is a "controversial issue" tag on the top of the Talk page. So please be WP:CIV and follow proper etiquette. In the meantime I politely request you rv yourself, and begin a section explaining your POV to justify the deletion of that text. Be sure I will not reverse it again. -- Mariordo ( talk) 21:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Inter-Services Intelligence. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
-t BMW
c-
23:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I have just added numerous sections on the article talk page that I have concerns about. I would hope that you would comment there. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 09:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Just a heads up, when you open up a thread on someone at WP:ANI or elsewhere, it's considered good form to notify that user on their user talk page so they can respond. I have notified User: Mercenary2k already so this is just for future reference. Oren0 ( talk) 04:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I am contacting you because I see you have contributed to articles about the military history of Pakistan or its armed forces. To help improve Wikipedia's coverage of this important topic, and to provide support and coordination of individual editors, the Military history WikiProject has now set up a new Pakistani military history task force.
If you would like to join up, as a founder member of this important new initiative, please add your name to the Participants' List. Thank you for your time. I hope you can help. Roger Davies talk 06:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Check out what I've been up to. :) BOZ ( talk) 17:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! :)
As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ ( talk) 18:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Regarding your recent two rv on the article, if you read the book then please justify in the talk page why do you think that text in uncessary. Clearly Solomon presented the work of individuals who passed away ( Roger Revelle the prime example), then the book presentation is limited to what he wrote. As you can see in that Talk page, the entire article's content has been discussed, and such changes required a discussion. Also, did you notice there is a "controversial issue" tag on the top of the Talk page. So please be WP:CIV and follow proper etiquette. In the meantime I politely request you rv yourself, and begin a section explaining your POV to justify the deletion of that text. Be sure I will not reverse it again. -- Mariordo ( talk) 21:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Inter-Services Intelligence. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
-t BMW
c-
23:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I have just added numerous sections on the article talk page that I have concerns about. I would hope that you would comment there. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 09:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Just a heads up, when you open up a thread on someone at WP:ANI or elsewhere, it's considered good form to notify that user on their user talk page so they can respond. I have notified User: Mercenary2k already so this is just for future reference. Oren0 ( talk) 04:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I am contacting you because I see you have contributed to articles about the military history of Pakistan or its armed forces. To help improve Wikipedia's coverage of this important topic, and to provide support and coordination of individual editors, the Military history WikiProject has now set up a new Pakistani military history task force.
If you would like to join up, as a founder member of this important new initiative, please add your name to the Participants' List. Thank you for your time. I hope you can help. Roger Davies talk 06:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)