From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:C759)

Leave a message

Archive

Three-revert rule on Jason Momoa

Please be aware that being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing, especially if you violate the three-revert rule. While there are exemptions (e.g., Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to Wikipedia's biographies of living persons (BLP) policy), you must clearly explain the exemption in the edit summary or in a separate section on the talk page. In general, it's best to report the issue (once, not three separate times) and allow other editors to handle further reverts.

Also, please do not accuse other editors of vandalism when it's a different issue such as unsourced or poorly sourced content. Vandalism has a very specific meaning here on Wikipedia and inaccurate accusations of vandalism unfortunately tend to provoke further disruption. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 03:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Why did you revert changes on Dumka wiki page?

Sampurana Shiksha Kavach is a program launched by the district administration. You can dispute the external link to the district website but why remove the entire content? Shashanksinghal.iitkgp ( talk) 12:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

he/him · pending changes reviewer, rollbacker, 100314 edits since: 2014-07-17, last edit on 2024-06-14

I MADE A HUNDO THOUSIE EDITS AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS STUPID T-SHIRT!

jp× g 🗯️ 02:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:C759)

Leave a message

Archive

Three-revert rule on Jason Momoa

Please be aware that being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing, especially if you violate the three-revert rule. While there are exemptions (e.g., Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to Wikipedia's biographies of living persons (BLP) policy), you must clearly explain the exemption in the edit summary or in a separate section on the talk page. In general, it's best to report the issue (once, not three separate times) and allow other editors to handle further reverts.

Also, please do not accuse other editors of vandalism when it's a different issue such as unsourced or poorly sourced content. Vandalism has a very specific meaning here on Wikipedia and inaccurate accusations of vandalism unfortunately tend to provoke further disruption. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 03:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Why did you revert changes on Dumka wiki page?

Sampurana Shiksha Kavach is a program launched by the district administration. You can dispute the external link to the district website but why remove the entire content? Shashanksinghal.iitkgp ( talk) 12:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

he/him · pending changes reviewer, rollbacker, 100314 edits since: 2014-07-17, last edit on 2024-06-14

I MADE A HUNDO THOUSIE EDITS AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS STUPID T-SHIRT!

jp× g 🗯️ 02:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook