It seemed unnecessary to me to include "non-accredited" on the "one-year" institution. I think that's why it wasn't reinserted when the other two were. I don't object, though. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Could you please leave your comments at a Davit Vitter RFC? Thanks. ∴ Therefore | talk 15:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
America 21, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}} to the top of
America 21.
Shell
babelfish
17:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Conservative organizations in the United States ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
The article William Griffith (US politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. –
Hysteria18 (
Talk •
Contributions)
21:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Creation Safaris. Since you had some involvement with the Creation Safaris redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm ( talk) 03:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, C56C! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Firestar464 ( talk) 06:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
It seemed unnecessary to me to include "non-accredited" on the "one-year" institution. I think that's why it wasn't reinserted when the other two were. I don't object, though. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Could you please leave your comments at a Davit Vitter RFC? Thanks. ∴ Therefore | talk 15:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
America 21, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}} to the top of
America 21.
Shell
babelfish
17:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Conservative organizations in the United States ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
The article William Griffith (US politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. –
Hysteria18 (
Talk •
Contributions)
21:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Creation Safaris. Since you had some involvement with the Creation Safaris redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm ( talk) 03:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, C56C! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Firestar464 ( talk) 06:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)