|
You just reverted Insulator (electrical). I would say that that was a good faith edit. Fahadsadah ( talk) 17:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Just like to give you a thumbs up and thank you for your work fighting vandalism here. Keep it up! :) - Kingpin13 ( talk) 18:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Just because an edit uses the word penis does not mean it is vandalism. I am trying to fix a fallacy of information on the Last Judgment by Michelangelo that comes from mistaken assumptions stemming from its pre-restored state. When a certain penis was painted over and changed the orginial intentions (and offensivness) of the work.
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work fighting vandalism.. keep up the great work. Michael (Talk) 18:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
Hay why do you guys keep sending me warnings I don't need them I undid the edits so why do you all still think there bad. Thy aren't hurting Wikipedia so their is no problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nulledit ( talk • contribs) 19:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Why don't you have a userpage, C+C? Valerian456 Hush, Rush 09:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
You got a bit carried away with your reversion of Thrilla in Manila - the portion you thought was removed was moved to a more appropriate place. Also, the Citations and NPOV boxes were properly added, and if you cared to participate in the Talk section of articles you edit, were agreed by multiple editors.
Nothing was removed from the article.
Please read thoroughly, including the relevant Talk page, before insta-reverting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 ( talk) 19:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
I apologize if I reverted you by mistake on Frank Zappa, as I thought I was reverting User talk:204.39.36.130. So if I did revert you, I am very sorry. Regards, — Mattisse ( Talk) 19:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
|
You just reverted Insulator (electrical). I would say that that was a good faith edit. Fahadsadah ( talk) 17:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Just like to give you a thumbs up and thank you for your work fighting vandalism here. Keep it up! :) - Kingpin13 ( talk) 18:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Just because an edit uses the word penis does not mean it is vandalism. I am trying to fix a fallacy of information on the Last Judgment by Michelangelo that comes from mistaken assumptions stemming from its pre-restored state. When a certain penis was painted over and changed the orginial intentions (and offensivness) of the work.
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work fighting vandalism.. keep up the great work. Michael (Talk) 18:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
Hay why do you guys keep sending me warnings I don't need them I undid the edits so why do you all still think there bad. Thy aren't hurting Wikipedia so their is no problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nulledit ( talk • contribs) 19:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Why don't you have a userpage, C+C? Valerian456 Hush, Rush 09:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
You got a bit carried away with your reversion of Thrilla in Manila - the portion you thought was removed was moved to a more appropriate place. Also, the Citations and NPOV boxes were properly added, and if you cared to participate in the Talk section of articles you edit, were agreed by multiple editors.
Nothing was removed from the article.
Please read thoroughly, including the relevant Talk page, before insta-reverting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 ( talk) 19:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
I apologize if I reverted you by mistake on Frank Zappa, as I thought I was reverting User talk:204.39.36.130. So if I did revert you, I am very sorry. Regards, — Mattisse ( Talk) 19:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.