I noticed you have been removing sources from Wikipedia articles here and here. It's very important for sources to be cited on Wikipedia, and they should not be removed unless there is consensus to do so. I have re-added the sources, and I encourage you to refrain from removing sources in the future. All the best, – Quadell ( talk) 14:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, upon further investigation, I see that the
Larry Tanenbaum links don't seem to back up the information given. I've commented on that
Talk:Larry Tanenbaum, so perhaps we can discuss it there. –
Quadell (
talk) 14:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see any excuse for this at
Jew however.
Dougweller (
talk) 19:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Related issue here at Paula Zahn, which I have repaired. -- CliffC ( talk) 21:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see any excuse for this at
Jew however.
Dougweller (
talk) 19:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
did not get what you mean20:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- How do you justify this edit [1]? What's wrong with the source? Dougweller ( talk) 04:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Edit warring at Bloomex
Hello Bw213. There seems to be a talk page consensus to keep the material by Ellen Roseman. You appear to have a WP:Conflict of interest on this article, and you've been removing material that is critical of Bloomex. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked. Nothing prevents you from trying to find other material in reliable sources that comments on Bloomex's business practices, and offering it for consideration on the article Talk page. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you have been removing sources from Wikipedia articles here and here. It's very important for sources to be cited on Wikipedia, and they should not be removed unless there is consensus to do so. I have re-added the sources, and I encourage you to refrain from removing sources in the future. All the best, – Quadell ( talk) 14:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, upon further investigation, I see that the
Larry Tanenbaum links don't seem to back up the information given. I've commented on that
Talk:Larry Tanenbaum, so perhaps we can discuss it there. –
Quadell (
talk) 14:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see any excuse for this at
Jew however.
Dougweller (
talk) 19:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Related issue here at Paula Zahn, which I have repaired. -- CliffC ( talk) 21:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see any excuse for this at
Jew however.
Dougweller (
talk) 19:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
did not get what you mean20:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- How do you justify this edit [1]? What's wrong with the source? Dougweller ( talk) 04:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Edit warring at Bloomex
Hello Bw213. There seems to be a talk page consensus to keep the material by Ellen Roseman. You appear to have a WP:Conflict of interest on this article, and you've been removing material that is critical of Bloomex. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked. Nothing prevents you from trying to find other material in reliable sources that comments on Bloomex's business practices, and offering it for consideration on the article Talk page. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)