This is BunnyyHop's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
![]() |
The Socratic Barnstar | |
Keep up the good work Bunny hop it looks like you're really trying hard. Don't get discouraged have a happy 2021! 46.7.7.125 ( talk) 03:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC) |
Hola! Sometimes a break, even if forced, is good. Hope your energy is conserved and renewed, you find less contentious areas to edit on the wiki and are able to create knowledge off-wiki. Best! See you around. Vikram Vincent 13:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
I really worried about you having to go through that massive, litigious hell. It genuinely stressed me out just reading it. No one deserves that kind of recrimination. I hope you can do some self-care for a bit and come back stronger. I hope you're OK. Stix1776 ( talk) 04:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Awarded for your continuous contributions to articles relevant to WikiProject Socialism. Awarded by Cdjp1 on 23 July 2021 |
On 4 March 2021, you were topic-banned from Marxism-Leninism for a WP:BATTLEGROUND / WP:WINNING and WP:CIVILPOV approach on the topic of Marxism-Leninism. You violated this topic ban on 5 Aug 2021 [1] [2] by mass-removing academic content from the Cuba page that accurately described the Cuban political system and proceeded to falsely characterize the content of these sources on the talk page. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 14:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Here is also a formal notice: There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Snooganssnoogans (
talk) 17:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Cullen328: thanks for your response and hints, they are very good :) It also feels satisfactory to have the freedom to expand to other themes; and even though I'm a bit apprehensive about my privacy, which, too, confined me to only edit specific topics, although it might not be of such importance. Plus, I can contribute about those themes in two different wikis at the same time, whereas, right now, I'm only contributing to one. I'm still wondering what my relationship to M/L, and related contentious topics, must be if the ban is lifted. Obviously, I must really avoid the behavior that got me banned in the first place by understanding it; but, for instance, the comment I made yesterday that violated my topic-ban. I did not understand if there was something wrong with the comment itself that prompted users to say the behavior I was banned for in the first place will continue, or if it was just a preconception due to the whole context. -- BunnyyHop ( talk) 05:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
I am interested in contemporary history (XX and XXI centuries). I find it hard to discover any subject within that topic to contribute to that is not within my topic ban. Do you have any suggestions?Sure! Plenty! Effectively the history of any country that didn't specifically have a M/L regime could work. If you look at Australian history - especially 21st century - you'd need to dig pretty deeply to get to the elements of government and politics that relate to M/L theory, support, or policy. There are and were, of course, M/L supporters in Australia but there are about 25 million people who I guarantee are not. And the handful that are/were can be avoided. Or you can apply an abundance of caution and avoid politics altogether. Focus on the history of community organisations and charities, art and architecture, conflicts based on religion, cultural mores, oddities like culture-specific parlance or colloquialisms, infrastructure projects, and so on. When all else fails, I go to WP:AFD to see if there is something I can save, or I click Special:Random and look at what needs to be done. St★lwart 111 08:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ICANN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
This is BunnyyHop's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
![]() |
The Socratic Barnstar | |
Keep up the good work Bunny hop it looks like you're really trying hard. Don't get discouraged have a happy 2021! 46.7.7.125 ( talk) 03:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC) |
Hola! Sometimes a break, even if forced, is good. Hope your energy is conserved and renewed, you find less contentious areas to edit on the wiki and are able to create knowledge off-wiki. Best! See you around. Vikram Vincent 13:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
I really worried about you having to go through that massive, litigious hell. It genuinely stressed me out just reading it. No one deserves that kind of recrimination. I hope you can do some self-care for a bit and come back stronger. I hope you're OK. Stix1776 ( talk) 04:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Awarded for your continuous contributions to articles relevant to WikiProject Socialism. Awarded by Cdjp1 on 23 July 2021 |
On 4 March 2021, you were topic-banned from Marxism-Leninism for a WP:BATTLEGROUND / WP:WINNING and WP:CIVILPOV approach on the topic of Marxism-Leninism. You violated this topic ban on 5 Aug 2021 [1] [2] by mass-removing academic content from the Cuba page that accurately described the Cuban political system and proceeded to falsely characterize the content of these sources on the talk page. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 14:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Here is also a formal notice: There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Snooganssnoogans (
talk) 17:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Cullen328: thanks for your response and hints, they are very good :) It also feels satisfactory to have the freedom to expand to other themes; and even though I'm a bit apprehensive about my privacy, which, too, confined me to only edit specific topics, although it might not be of such importance. Plus, I can contribute about those themes in two different wikis at the same time, whereas, right now, I'm only contributing to one. I'm still wondering what my relationship to M/L, and related contentious topics, must be if the ban is lifted. Obviously, I must really avoid the behavior that got me banned in the first place by understanding it; but, for instance, the comment I made yesterday that violated my topic-ban. I did not understand if there was something wrong with the comment itself that prompted users to say the behavior I was banned for in the first place will continue, or if it was just a preconception due to the whole context. -- BunnyyHop ( talk) 05:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
I am interested in contemporary history (XX and XXI centuries). I find it hard to discover any subject within that topic to contribute to that is not within my topic ban. Do you have any suggestions?Sure! Plenty! Effectively the history of any country that didn't specifically have a M/L regime could work. If you look at Australian history - especially 21st century - you'd need to dig pretty deeply to get to the elements of government and politics that relate to M/L theory, support, or policy. There are and were, of course, M/L supporters in Australia but there are about 25 million people who I guarantee are not. And the handful that are/were can be avoided. Or you can apply an abundance of caution and avoid politics altogether. Focus on the history of community organisations and charities, art and architecture, conflicts based on religion, cultural mores, oddities like culture-specific parlance or colloquialisms, infrastructure projects, and so on. When all else fails, I go to WP:AFD to see if there is something I can save, or I click Special:Random and look at what needs to be done. St★lwart 111 08:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ICANN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)