Ethan loves tomato — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5C2:3E80:2C68:9F59:763E:36F5 ( talk) 17:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Buddy431, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Slashme (
talk) 05:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Did you have a point in your RD comment other than to be abusive, rude, and dismissing of anyone and everyone who may possibly disagree with your opinion? Some users are discussing a user who has, over the past few years, been very rude to other users (while making perfectly valid posts most of the time) and has stubbornly stated that he will not under any conditions sign his posts because he has been asked to do so - that is his only reason. If you have an opinion on the matter, please share it. If all you want to do is ridicule everyone for having opinions, I don't see why anyone would care. -- kainaw ™ 22:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
(copied from user talk:Buddy432)
Your suggestions of adding the reason is very good. - Sanskit ( talk) 17:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Buddy431 ... May I suggest {{ User Alternate Acct}} (or one of its companion templates) for your User pages? You can see how I use it on my User pages. Happy Editing! — 71.166.147.78 ( talk · contribs) 17:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Excellent off-topic debate collapsing on the RD just now. Well done. -- Tagishsimon (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
You were asking where you could find this, even though it isn't explicitly stated there. Either way, you can find it here. It all boils down to, really, Jimbo says it's wrong. Since principle #12 is that Jimbo is the ultimate authority, then that means that Jimbo is right. Discussion over.
That's it, in a nutshell. Silver seren C 20:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Any more thought on opening an RfC? Several editors are interested in pursuing the idea—including me, now. I can open it and advertise it, if you like, as long as we know what we are debating. There have been several suggestions for the summary statement but that still needs to be bashed out, IMO -- Jubilee ♫ clipman 13:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. On this AFD, you commented that it was my job as nominator to look for sources. Well, I have now done so, and was unable to find any reliable ones - this seems to be a non-notable concept. May I ask you to reconsider your 'Procedural keep'? Thanks. Robofish ( talk) 00:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
With this. I only hope the irony will be understood. -- Cyclopia talk 19:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
I have proposed that Smelly socks be merged to Foot odor. Since you contributed to the recent AfD on Smelly socks, you might be interested in participating in the discussion to merge at Talk:Foot odor#Merger proposal. SnottyWong confess 05:19, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Your response to the Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold question on the reference desk is absolutely unacceptable.
It makes me angry beyond belief - and I want a full and complete apology from you for it.
For shame? WTF? Read what I actually wrote - not what you think that I wrote. I said that our article does contain that specific information...and it does. It doesn't take more than a single sentence to answer the OP's question. You may care to dispute whether our article is correct or not - but DO NOT reprimand me for doing precisely what the Ref Desk's mandate is - which is to find data primarily within the encyclopedia and tell our OP's where to go read it for themselves. If you think the article is incorrect then go there and fix it - but meanwhile, what I wrote is true, correct and in line with what we do here at the reference desks. You should not come here and put me down for doing what you have completely and utterly failed to do. You talk about some nebulous google results without pointing to where they actually are - we don't know whether your answer is backed by reputable sources or from some bunch of random conspiracy theorists.
You are required to Assume Good Faith - you are required not to make personal attacks on me. You are required to show reasonable sources for disputable claims. You are required NOT to do original research. You are expected to answer reference desk questions with REFERENCES. You obeyed none of those rules - and that alone ought to be enough to earn you a reprimand and a block.
Now apologize dammit.
SteveBaker (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
I thought that your response at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Why can we see stars? was very well judged (with regard to the question and the apparent knowledge of the questioner) and admirably full. Deor ( talk) 00:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to get further into the issue of how to deal with LC's socks, please go to the ref desk talk page. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 20:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate your comment on the MfD. However, the templates were not the only reason he was blocked. Again, thank you for commenting and if you need me, now or in the future, never hesitate to contact me. MJ94 ( talk) 18:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
In the area? You're invited to the | |
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting | |
Date: 31 October 2010 | |
Time: noon | |
Place:
Midtown Exchange Global Market, East Lake Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 44°56′57″N 93°15′40″W / 44.9493°N 93.2612°W | |
A response would be appreciated regarding Ghostognemo's page. Cptnono ( talk) 07:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
The Secretary of State had indeed scanned in each of the challenged ballots and released them to the public, making the thousands of ballots available to anyone who asked. The main purpose of scanning these ballots in, aside from showing the goods to the various media outlets, was in fact to aid in the canvassing board's ruling process. You can see a video of the canvassing board using these ballot scans in their rulings. Now, as for where these scans are available online, the only website that still has all the ballots available to the public is MPR, and you can find that database here. Hopefully this is of some use to you. Regards, Brash ( talk) 19:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
In the area? You're invited to the | |
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting | |
Date: 20 November 2010 | |
Time: 1:00-3:30 ( click here for full agenda) R.S.V.P. by Nov. 17 for free lunch + parking | |
Place:
Minnesota History Center 345 Kellogg Blvd, St. Paul, Minnesota 44°57′00″N 93°06′20″W / 44.95°N 93.1055°W | |
User:Buddy431/Garbage scow JamesBWatson ( talk) 19:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Note that there is an admin named User:Ihcoyc. While it may not be obvious at first sight, Ihcoyc is Jesus spelled out in Greek (IHCOYC). The username policy is inconsistent sometimes. — Soap — 19:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
...for your contribution to Pig (disambiguation)! Chrisrus ( talk) 20:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
If you've got concerns with something, take it to a talk page rather than issuing personal attacks in front of the OP. I also notice that some character said that capybara was a type of fish, a lot grosser error than my post that you griped about. I corrected him on that, with a rather gentler touch than you used. Oddly enough, you didn't issue an attack against that user. So I can only assume you've singled me out... and I've had enough of that kind of thing. Don't do it again. P.S. If you actually read what I posted, I made no claim that King Tut was the world's oldest. You were so hell-bent on making your personal attack that you overlooked that point. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 04:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
And as regards your "made it disappear" comment, [1] you failed to note that I moved a week or two's worth of stuff to my current archive page, and you only cited the first half of that action. Again, you were so fixated on making a personal attack that you overlooked the details. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 04:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Collapse for clarity
|
---|
|
Hi there, I was going to write an article about garbage scows and noticed that an article had been written previously and then moved to your userspace [3] for some reason. Would you mind if I expanded this and moved it back to article space? It seems a bit short as it is but has a couple references and seems to at least meet minimum guidelines. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 11:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for voicing for the side of reason and measured response ( here). I agree with your viewpoint here; honestly, it seems obvious that this is the most coherent philosophy to adopt, and it's frustrating that so much debate goes on about this. Anyway, thanks for summarizing it so concisely. Nimur ( talk) 21:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
G'day Buddy. Thanks for looking after the OP's posting. I notice that you took the opportunity to gratuitously name Jayron. The identity of the User who removed the posting is entirely irrelevant. On the Reference Desk you also made the statement Jayron is wrong. That statement has little meaning, even though Jayron himself did a mea culpa and wrote about himself in similar words. It may be your personal opinion that Jayron is wrong but that also has no place whatsover on the Science Reference Desk.
You appear to be mounting something of a vendetta against Jayron. Please remove your references to him from the Reference Desk. Thanks.
Dolphin (
t) 03:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I am in favor of opening a discussion of the name too. Then his case can be used as an example for future cases WhisperToMe ( talk) 23:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
I like your discussion of the Inner Party (written on 2011-10-27), but I suspect it will soon go down the memory hole. The secret is to realize that the dealer has already stacked the deck. You play at your peril, because the outcome is already set. Lower your expectations about this venue. You'll be glad you did! Regards, — HowardBGolden ( talk) 02:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
This was unneccesary because it trivializes the seriousness of what Belchman did. I find the tone of what you said, especially the insinuation that only "Jews and Sexual minorities" are people who get "special treatment" of some sort at Wikipedia, inappropriate. That is highly offensive, and it does not help Belchman become a more tolerant person by leaving the message you did. It makes light of the seriousness of his actions, and completely misstates the nature of what he did. If you actually believe the rediculous things you wrote on his talk page, I weep for your soul. -- Jayron 32 06:25, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Idiotic. With a "T", not a "D". -- MZMcBride ( talk) 04:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip. That question should have been deep-sixed immediately. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:12, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Buddy, I've moved your link to the diff on my deletion to the ref desk talk page because I don't think it makes sense to blank something and then link straight to it. I hope you don't mind. -- Tango ( talk) 18:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
You should peruse
Wikipedia:No legal threats when you get a chance. Blocking a user who has made legal threats has nothing at all to do with the issue(s) at hand, it's simply preventative.
—
V = IR (
Talk •
Contribs) 02:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
You may find this essay echos what you're saying: WP:DOLT. SÆdon talk 05:02, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 05:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In the spirit of WP:BLP I suggest you might consider changing your recent statement at the huamnities desk "For more info how X was beating testing" to "For more info how X was accused of beating testing"--since there is no physical evidence, no admission, and no court decision that comes to this conclusion. Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 04:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your username commenting at an Arbcom discussion regarding civility. An effort is underway that would likely benifit if your views were included. I hope you will append regards at: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Civility enforcement/Questionnaire Thank you for considering this request. My76Strat ( talk) 09:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) ( talk) 09:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac ( talk) 03:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Ethan loves tomato — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5C2:3E80:2C68:9F59:763E:36F5 ( talk) 17:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Buddy431, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Slashme (
talk) 05:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Did you have a point in your RD comment other than to be abusive, rude, and dismissing of anyone and everyone who may possibly disagree with your opinion? Some users are discussing a user who has, over the past few years, been very rude to other users (while making perfectly valid posts most of the time) and has stubbornly stated that he will not under any conditions sign his posts because he has been asked to do so - that is his only reason. If you have an opinion on the matter, please share it. If all you want to do is ridicule everyone for having opinions, I don't see why anyone would care. -- kainaw ™ 22:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
(copied from user talk:Buddy432)
Your suggestions of adding the reason is very good. - Sanskit ( talk) 17:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Buddy431 ... May I suggest {{ User Alternate Acct}} (or one of its companion templates) for your User pages? You can see how I use it on my User pages. Happy Editing! — 71.166.147.78 ( talk · contribs) 17:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Excellent off-topic debate collapsing on the RD just now. Well done. -- Tagishsimon (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
You were asking where you could find this, even though it isn't explicitly stated there. Either way, you can find it here. It all boils down to, really, Jimbo says it's wrong. Since principle #12 is that Jimbo is the ultimate authority, then that means that Jimbo is right. Discussion over.
That's it, in a nutshell. Silver seren C 20:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Any more thought on opening an RfC? Several editors are interested in pursuing the idea—including me, now. I can open it and advertise it, if you like, as long as we know what we are debating. There have been several suggestions for the summary statement but that still needs to be bashed out, IMO -- Jubilee ♫ clipman 13:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. On this AFD, you commented that it was my job as nominator to look for sources. Well, I have now done so, and was unable to find any reliable ones - this seems to be a non-notable concept. May I ask you to reconsider your 'Procedural keep'? Thanks. Robofish ( talk) 00:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
With this. I only hope the irony will be understood. -- Cyclopia talk 19:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
I have proposed that Smelly socks be merged to Foot odor. Since you contributed to the recent AfD on Smelly socks, you might be interested in participating in the discussion to merge at Talk:Foot odor#Merger proposal. SnottyWong confess 05:19, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Your response to the Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold question on the reference desk is absolutely unacceptable.
It makes me angry beyond belief - and I want a full and complete apology from you for it.
For shame? WTF? Read what I actually wrote - not what you think that I wrote. I said that our article does contain that specific information...and it does. It doesn't take more than a single sentence to answer the OP's question. You may care to dispute whether our article is correct or not - but DO NOT reprimand me for doing precisely what the Ref Desk's mandate is - which is to find data primarily within the encyclopedia and tell our OP's where to go read it for themselves. If you think the article is incorrect then go there and fix it - but meanwhile, what I wrote is true, correct and in line with what we do here at the reference desks. You should not come here and put me down for doing what you have completely and utterly failed to do. You talk about some nebulous google results without pointing to where they actually are - we don't know whether your answer is backed by reputable sources or from some bunch of random conspiracy theorists.
You are required to Assume Good Faith - you are required not to make personal attacks on me. You are required to show reasonable sources for disputable claims. You are required NOT to do original research. You are expected to answer reference desk questions with REFERENCES. You obeyed none of those rules - and that alone ought to be enough to earn you a reprimand and a block.
Now apologize dammit.
SteveBaker (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
I thought that your response at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Why can we see stars? was very well judged (with regard to the question and the apparent knowledge of the questioner) and admirably full. Deor ( talk) 00:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to get further into the issue of how to deal with LC's socks, please go to the ref desk talk page. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 20:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate your comment on the MfD. However, the templates were not the only reason he was blocked. Again, thank you for commenting and if you need me, now or in the future, never hesitate to contact me. MJ94 ( talk) 18:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
In the area? You're invited to the | |
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting | |
Date: 31 October 2010 | |
Time: noon | |
Place:
Midtown Exchange Global Market, East Lake Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 44°56′57″N 93°15′40″W / 44.9493°N 93.2612°W | |
A response would be appreciated regarding Ghostognemo's page. Cptnono ( talk) 07:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
The Secretary of State had indeed scanned in each of the challenged ballots and released them to the public, making the thousands of ballots available to anyone who asked. The main purpose of scanning these ballots in, aside from showing the goods to the various media outlets, was in fact to aid in the canvassing board's ruling process. You can see a video of the canvassing board using these ballot scans in their rulings. Now, as for where these scans are available online, the only website that still has all the ballots available to the public is MPR, and you can find that database here. Hopefully this is of some use to you. Regards, Brash ( talk) 19:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
In the area? You're invited to the | |
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting | |
Date: 20 November 2010 | |
Time: 1:00-3:30 ( click here for full agenda) R.S.V.P. by Nov. 17 for free lunch + parking | |
Place:
Minnesota History Center 345 Kellogg Blvd, St. Paul, Minnesota 44°57′00″N 93°06′20″W / 44.95°N 93.1055°W | |
User:Buddy431/Garbage scow JamesBWatson ( talk) 19:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Note that there is an admin named User:Ihcoyc. While it may not be obvious at first sight, Ihcoyc is Jesus spelled out in Greek (IHCOYC). The username policy is inconsistent sometimes. — Soap — 19:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
...for your contribution to Pig (disambiguation)! Chrisrus ( talk) 20:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
If you've got concerns with something, take it to a talk page rather than issuing personal attacks in front of the OP. I also notice that some character said that capybara was a type of fish, a lot grosser error than my post that you griped about. I corrected him on that, with a rather gentler touch than you used. Oddly enough, you didn't issue an attack against that user. So I can only assume you've singled me out... and I've had enough of that kind of thing. Don't do it again. P.S. If you actually read what I posted, I made no claim that King Tut was the world's oldest. You were so hell-bent on making your personal attack that you overlooked that point. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 04:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
And as regards your "made it disappear" comment, [1] you failed to note that I moved a week or two's worth of stuff to my current archive page, and you only cited the first half of that action. Again, you were so fixated on making a personal attack that you overlooked the details. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 04:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Collapse for clarity
|
---|
|
Hi there, I was going to write an article about garbage scows and noticed that an article had been written previously and then moved to your userspace [3] for some reason. Would you mind if I expanded this and moved it back to article space? It seems a bit short as it is but has a couple references and seems to at least meet minimum guidelines. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 11:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for voicing for the side of reason and measured response ( here). I agree with your viewpoint here; honestly, it seems obvious that this is the most coherent philosophy to adopt, and it's frustrating that so much debate goes on about this. Anyway, thanks for summarizing it so concisely. Nimur ( talk) 21:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
G'day Buddy. Thanks for looking after the OP's posting. I notice that you took the opportunity to gratuitously name Jayron. The identity of the User who removed the posting is entirely irrelevant. On the Reference Desk you also made the statement Jayron is wrong. That statement has little meaning, even though Jayron himself did a mea culpa and wrote about himself in similar words. It may be your personal opinion that Jayron is wrong but that also has no place whatsover on the Science Reference Desk.
You appear to be mounting something of a vendetta against Jayron. Please remove your references to him from the Reference Desk. Thanks.
Dolphin (
t) 03:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I am in favor of opening a discussion of the name too. Then his case can be used as an example for future cases WhisperToMe ( talk) 23:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
I like your discussion of the Inner Party (written on 2011-10-27), but I suspect it will soon go down the memory hole. The secret is to realize that the dealer has already stacked the deck. You play at your peril, because the outcome is already set. Lower your expectations about this venue. You'll be glad you did! Regards, — HowardBGolden ( talk) 02:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
This was unneccesary because it trivializes the seriousness of what Belchman did. I find the tone of what you said, especially the insinuation that only "Jews and Sexual minorities" are people who get "special treatment" of some sort at Wikipedia, inappropriate. That is highly offensive, and it does not help Belchman become a more tolerant person by leaving the message you did. It makes light of the seriousness of his actions, and completely misstates the nature of what he did. If you actually believe the rediculous things you wrote on his talk page, I weep for your soul. -- Jayron 32 06:25, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Idiotic. With a "T", not a "D". -- MZMcBride ( talk) 04:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip. That question should have been deep-sixed immediately. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:12, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Buddy, I've moved your link to the diff on my deletion to the ref desk talk page because I don't think it makes sense to blank something and then link straight to it. I hope you don't mind. -- Tango ( talk) 18:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
You should peruse
Wikipedia:No legal threats when you get a chance. Blocking a user who has made legal threats has nothing at all to do with the issue(s) at hand, it's simply preventative.
—
V = IR (
Talk •
Contribs) 02:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
You may find this essay echos what you're saying: WP:DOLT. SÆdon talk 05:02, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 05:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In the spirit of WP:BLP I suggest you might consider changing your recent statement at the huamnities desk "For more info how X was beating testing" to "For more info how X was accused of beating testing"--since there is no physical evidence, no admission, and no court decision that comes to this conclusion. Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 04:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your username commenting at an Arbcom discussion regarding civility. An effort is underway that would likely benifit if your views were included. I hope you will append regards at: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Civility enforcement/Questionnaire Thank you for considering this request. My76Strat ( talk) 09:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) ( talk) 09:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Buddy431/Portal of Evil during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac ( talk) 03:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!