Please add to Francis Mackenzie, 1st Baron Seaforth .. - Kittybrewster 09:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Is there much point adding a note about the dispute between Richard and Steve?
AIUI Steve has resigned from the BWMP and Richard says he intends to continue with the site in a new an improved format. Steve has said he intends to discuss with the CWGC regarding them hosting the grave pictures he has copies of, and he has copyright permission to use them from each person concerned. I'm not sure there's much to be gained adding the note until something actually happens. --
Andy Wade
20:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
as one of your interests. There are not very many of us. That p*ss poor excuse of an article is mostly mine and I would be thrilled if you were to move it forward a step or two. Steps that I promise to match. Life is supposed to be interesting. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 21:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add to Francis Mackenzie, 1st Baron Seaforth .. - Kittybrewster 09:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Is there much point adding a note about the dispute between Richard and Steve?
AIUI Steve has resigned from the BWMP and Richard says he intends to continue with the site in a new an improved format. Steve has said he intends to discuss with the CWGC regarding them hosting the grave pictures he has copies of, and he has copyright permission to use them from each person concerned. I'm not sure there's much to be gained adding the note until something actually happens. --
Andy Wade
20:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
as one of your interests. There are not very many of us. That p*ss poor excuse of an article is mostly mine and I would be thrilled if you were to move it forward a step or two. Steps that I promise to match. Life is supposed to be interesting. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 21:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)