Great article - I am impressed with the depth of information here. I think your lead section is really well-written, and I enjoyed the historical background as well, I think that will tie in the reader to the topic. Nice job! Revagillman ( talk) 14:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Nice work so far on this page, I especially appreciate the cross-sectional depiction of the eddy. I would caution against excess use of jargon-y phrases and sentences which might lead the ready on a never ending wiki-tangent. Overall, it reads well and it's organized logically. The link to the HNLC page is a nice touch Willmfair ( talk) 06:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Great article - I am impressed with the depth of information here. I think your lead section is really well-written, and I enjoyed the historical background as well, I think that will tie in the reader to the topic. Nice job! Revagillman ( talk) 14:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Nice work so far on this page, I especially appreciate the cross-sectional depiction of the eddy. I would caution against excess use of jargon-y phrases and sentences which might lead the ready on a never ending wiki-tangent. Overall, it reads well and it's organized logically. The link to the HNLC page is a nice touch Willmfair ( talk) 06:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)