![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I noticed you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenick Network Systems as delete nearly 9 months ago, but the deletion was never done. Can you do this, or did you change you mind, or should I ask someone else to do it? Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 03:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
You'll need to tidy up after This, as the tag on the article and the log in the AfD lists now both point to redlinks. Worse, plenty of contributors will have watchlist pages that won't register new edits. It might be better for you just to revert yourself. -- Dweller ( talk) 10:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
And your comment was surprisingly unhelpful as well. Criticism is good, blatant personal attacks are not. Guy0307 ( talk) 00:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Please drop by the page and address the Richard Simmons edit. It is about filters you seem to be the major editor of. - Mgm| (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I'd appreciate it if your bot would stop messing up my WikiProject page. I understand that the pic on the project page is not free but please, make it stop doing that. I don't know of another pic I could put on the page. Carabera ( talk) 19:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, I added some updated info on the Polycom and included requested references. Hopefully, it will be to Wikipedia standards....I saw the note that it needed to be rewritten...I modified some of the older content. Does this look okay now..if so, can the two banners at the top of the page be removed? Chasingriley ( talk) 20:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Chasingriley
i have uploaded a newer small resolution image in place of that previous one. hence i took the liberty to remove the tag placed by you. actually i uploaded that image when i didn't knew much about copyright issues here on wikipedia. thanks, Sushant gupta ( talk) 13:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Bjweeks has been identified as an
Awesome Wikipedian, Cheers, If you'd like to show off your awesomeness, you can use this userbox. |
Hello! I just tried using it and got the following error: (2003, "Can't connect to MySQL server on 'sql-s1' (113)") Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 06:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted the Centrum (multivitamin) article. As far as I know it was not tagged for speedy, nor would I think it qualifies under any of the CSD criteria, and it hasn't been around long enough for a prod or afd. Because you did not provide a deletion summary, I'm unclear why the article was deleted. The article was nonsense when I found it, however I turned it into a legitimate stub. Please let me know. Shadowjams ( talk) 06:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! I saw at ANI that you upped Mfield's temp block to a perm one. Just thought you might want to update the block template so that they realise the perm block. Cheers -- Ged UK 10:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
|
The Template Barnstar | |
I award you this Template Barnstar for outstanding work in the area of templates and coding all over wiki! BJ rules! — Rlevse • Talk • 02:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Wow, how kind of you. Thanks for doing that bit of coding work without even being asked; it was really appreciated! NuclearWarfare ( Talk) 02:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
Hey, I noticed that you removed the copyvio tag from 4/3 Battalion. While large portions of the text do come from .mil sites (as I noted at the article's entry at Wikipedia:Copyright problems), there are also portions that come from these sites. Can you explain why you believe copyvio is unwarranted? (I could be wrong about it, but I'd still like an explanation, so I'll know for next time). Thanks, Nikkimaria ( talk) 23:31, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hope that explains it. BJ Talk 23:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for following up on those; looked like generally a SPAcct & the attribution on those images wasn't consistent. Hope the OTRS follows. Skier Dude ( talk) 09:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Small problem BJ. The ref dates you created are fine except when there's a single digit. They should be 2009-04-09 vice 2009-4-9. The format gurus will be all over this. Is it possible to tweak your script and rerun? Let me know. Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Ping. You responded to the OTRS ticket on this one. Your opinion would be most welcome. - Dan Dank55 ( push to talk) 23:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for share your source code in Database reports. I'm going to use them in Spanish Wikipedia, and I'm going to learn a bit more about SQL queries. Thanks and happy programming. Emijrp ( talk) 20:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, you removed some passages from this article invoking BLP. Can I just ask if there's some deeper reason for this? I recognise the passages could do with a bit more sourcing and I cannot currently vouch for every factual bit in there, but the scandals as such are clearly notable, had massive media coverage at the time, and the articles cited do seem to cover them in the general outlines. Do you read Greek? By the way, BLP doesn't really apply, since the man is dead, unless you acted out of concern over the other persons mentioned? Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Your edit of Phil Mickelson removed the following sourced text: Mickelson is unpopular with his fellow players. In a poll by GQ magazine, Mickelson was named as one of the athletes most hated by other PGA tour players. [1]
Please be careful with your edits and not remove sourced material without explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.240.57 ( talk) 23:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
people have been telling me that I need permission to use my script and I have to get approval, they called it a bot, so why isn't it. Buɡboy52.4 ( talk) 00:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Why did the subject of the article related to this AFD request deletion? If it was the vandalism, you could tell them the article is protected and looked after at the moment. - Mgm| (talk) 11:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Please undelete the image; the seven day grace period of F5 hasn't elapsed yet. Sceptre ( talk) 00:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
You co-nomination was much obliged and shall be passed on down the generations as the gift that keeps on giving. Or...whatever. I'm trying to make this as non-generic as possible. HIGH-FIVE! -- Closedmouth ( talk) 15:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
As an admin who had previously blocked this user, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Returned_blocked_user.-- Otterathome ( talk) 20:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi BJ, could you tell me, please, what the source was for this image you deleted? I can re-upload it and get an OTRS ticket for it. Cheers, SlimVirgin talk| contribs
Hi, i've responded to your Afd at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Herb_(anti-cancer). cheers
87.69.177.35 ( talk) has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Bjweeks,
X
clamation point has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! '
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The user is requesting unblock with valid reasoning, ie 'why was I blocked'. I see no notices on their page. The block log says for SOCK, but no examples or diffs are provided. Can you take a moment to post evidence on their user space possibly using the template {{IPsock|username|evidence=[[WP:SOCK|foo]]}}. Cheers. Nja 247 07:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
I no longer have access to OTRS. Could you please explain why the subject requested deletion. The request alone is not enough for an AFD to finish in deletion. - Mgm| (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi - can you tell me why the AfD was courtesy blanked? Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 05:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Your bot posted a duplicate template on File:New Zelda Logo.jpg. I'm assuming that's a bug? Haipa Doragon ( talk • contributions) 20:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
You blocked WEWhistleBlower a couple of weeks ago and the user is asking for unblocking. I'm not sure I understand the block. I've placed the unblock request on-hold pending more information from you. Toddst1 ( talk) 21:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Bjweeks. I thought I would bring your attention to this discussion. You started an AfD from otrs:2009032610045579. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. This little note is just to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. In addition, I'm proposing merging Wikipedia:WikiProject Image Monitoring Group, because their aims seem to be very similar. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Discussion about redirecting those projects is located here. Thanks. PhilKnight ( talk) 19:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Wouldn't this be {{ PD-Art}} ? Jheald ( talk) 12:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Re. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red cunt hair (2nd nomination)
Hi there,
Regarding this AfD closure,
I'd appreciate it if you could please elaborate on how you came to your decision that the consensus was to delete the article.
Thanks, Chzz ► 15:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
(Copied this back from your archive, after Miszabot archived it, to give more time for a response Chzz ► 23:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC))
Re. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red cunt hair (2nd nomination)
Hi there,
Regarding this AfD closure,
I'd appreciate it if you could please elaborate on how you came to your decision that the consensus was to delete the article.
Thanks, Chzz ► 15:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm fully aware that AfD is not a vote; I just don't see any clear consensus. Therefore - and absolutely no offense intended, nothing personal at all;
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Red cunt hair. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Chzz ► 22:49, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've pinged your e-mail. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 02:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I find your comment at WP:ANI, "The image namespace is deprecated, nothing to see here", to be inappropriate, condescending, and derogatory. Admins are supposed to conduct themselves, what was the word, politely, I think it was. The image space is not deprecated, it is expanded into the file namespace, and either file or image can be used interchangeably, per editor preference. The point is that is annoying for a bot to change a specifically chosen and perfectly valid syntax for a less desirable syntax. The issue certainly has not been resolved, unless some changes were made that I am not aware of, although at present the bot is not active for who knows what reason. 199.125.109.126 ( talk) 03:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a question about this as I still use Image: over File: as general force-of-habit. Is this change coming from a bot that is going through and manually changing Image to File or should all editors do so? I am kinda confused. - NeutralHomer • Talk • May 3, 2009 @ 04:22
Hi. A couple of days ago you removed an enormous amount of coatracking on this article. I also removed it, yesterday, and today it was added again. I removed it again, but I have the feeling that that's temporary. There seem to be a couple of editors at work here, and the article, even without the heaps of praise, is nothing but a bunch of kudos. I have half a mind of cleaning it up, but it's only half a mind right now. This is just a heads-up, I guess; it's probably too early for measures like protection and such, but I have the feeling I may revisit you here again. Thanks, and keep up the good work, Drmies ( talk) 03:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Myself, I interpret 7 days as 7X24, not (6X24) + 12. The advantage of keeping this is to avoid contributing to what seems to be developing into a competition between different admins about who can close the most. (I'm not think of you particularly, btw). And I'm not here to object to any of the closings. DGG ( talk) 00:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for that, I thought I might have missed it. =) American Eagle ( talk) 02:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, it looks as if the AfD fails on grounds that too many people think it's keen. Would you like to officially propose the merger into Disk Utility which you (sensibly, IMO) suggested? — Scheinwerfermann T· C 06:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Bringing this back (unanswered) from your Archive 8:
Wouldn't this be {{ PD-Art}} ? Jheald ( talk) 12:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Are you going to restore this image, or do I have to take it to Deletion Review? Jheald ( talk) 15:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
You deleted the page I created as titled above. I don't seem to be getting much cooperation from you so have decided to message you directly. Please could you have a look at the article at your earliest convenience and judge the page now amendments have taken place, then make (if necessary) judgments on how we can improve the article, in order for it to be accepted ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by As200 ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:Kufic.JPG. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jheald ( talk) 08:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Recently, I proposed an investigation into the identity of NIMSOffice. This anonymous user clearly pushes his own agenda. Now NIMSOffice also proposed to investigate me, please see this page and my comments: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/GFZLab#Report_date_May_9_2009.2C_06:10_.28UTC.29
I felt restrained to make in my comment an important point. With good probability I can indicate who NIMSOffice is, but I don't want this information to be public (in case I am mistaken). For WP-investigation it may be useful, though.
I suspect that NIMSOffice is K.Iakoubovskii from NIMS, Japan, who couathored a paper with Dubrovinskaia. This person is also involved in journal STAM, which published Dubrovinskaia's paper within a few weeks from submission, and against referees' rejection). On the above page you will find NIMSOffice's claim that he never had personal interactions with Dubrovinskaia... If NIMSOffice=K.Iakoubovskii, this would be obviously wrong. Aoganov ( talk) 01:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Artem R. Oganov
Please see and comment here. -- mav ( talk) 14:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Honda-logo.svg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Honda-logo.svg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Honda-logo.svg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Name has been hidden via OS instead of renamed; saves log entries. Thank you. -- Avi ( talk) 04:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you please confirm that the permission for File:2009WVTeenUSA wiki.jpg and others from that same set came from the photographer Jonathan Carter? I find it rather strange that he would release the photos in that way. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 02:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Hiya,
It says that you deleted User talk:Eva.maria2009, but there's no deletion reason - I see the user removed a tag with their first edit, but, I wondered why you removed my 'welcome' note? I think there might have been an error on it - I was about to fix that, but it had gone. I expect you had good reasons; please let me know. Cheers! Chzz ► 05:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you explain why the page TCE Company, Inc was deleted. It was not structured in the form of advertisement or spam. The page listed references for the accomplishments of the company and the firm has been in business for over 20 years. How is the content of this page any different from the content of other pages such as NewEgg, CDW and Talkswitch. All pages follow the same structure of content.The only difference is the size of the company. Bgatza ( talk) 14:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Brian
Hi. I'm not sure what the protocol is with helping each other out with tickets, so I figured I'd just drop you a note. :) I've been talking to the author of Ticket:2009060310047417 at User talk:Lamerica (and could have saved you some time yesterday if something pretty horrific and time-consuming had not come up at WP:CP, eating the rest of my afternoon and turning my attention to other matters into mush. Sorry!), and he has written you back to clarify the intentions of his release. I wanted to point out that conversation for context in case it's helpful. Apologies if the right thing for me to do is to directly involve myself, but, again, I'm not sure what the protocol is, and I'm just not innately that bold. At least, not until I learn the ropes. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
The other ticket was in photosubmissions, I've merged them all and moved it to permissions-commons. I thought they wanted to release the PDF, which I uploaded here File:080312CWR_LR.pdf, I didn't realize there was an article and images derived from the PDF. I'll go fix it. BJ Talk 18:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you explain why the page TCE Company, Inc was deleted. It was not structured in the form of advertisement or spam. The page listed references for the accomplishments of the company and the firm has been in business for over 20 years. There was no difference in the content of this page as opposed to the content of other pages such as NewEgg, CDW and Talkswitch. All pages follow the same structure of content.The only difference is the size of the company Bgatza ( talk) 16:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Brian
You owe me one. Keegan talk 07:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Please could you tell me why the Alan Harvey article was deleted? I'm not entirely sure how the system works so would be grateful for feedback -- JHumphries ( talk) 21:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I noticed you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenick Network Systems as delete nearly 9 months ago, but the deletion was never done. Can you do this, or did you change you mind, or should I ask someone else to do it? Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 03:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
You'll need to tidy up after This, as the tag on the article and the log in the AfD lists now both point to redlinks. Worse, plenty of contributors will have watchlist pages that won't register new edits. It might be better for you just to revert yourself. -- Dweller ( talk) 10:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
And your comment was surprisingly unhelpful as well. Criticism is good, blatant personal attacks are not. Guy0307 ( talk) 00:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Please drop by the page and address the Richard Simmons edit. It is about filters you seem to be the major editor of. - Mgm| (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I'd appreciate it if your bot would stop messing up my WikiProject page. I understand that the pic on the project page is not free but please, make it stop doing that. I don't know of another pic I could put on the page. Carabera ( talk) 19:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, I added some updated info on the Polycom and included requested references. Hopefully, it will be to Wikipedia standards....I saw the note that it needed to be rewritten...I modified some of the older content. Does this look okay now..if so, can the two banners at the top of the page be removed? Chasingriley ( talk) 20:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Chasingriley
i have uploaded a newer small resolution image in place of that previous one. hence i took the liberty to remove the tag placed by you. actually i uploaded that image when i didn't knew much about copyright issues here on wikipedia. thanks, Sushant gupta ( talk) 13:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Bjweeks has been identified as an
Awesome Wikipedian, Cheers, If you'd like to show off your awesomeness, you can use this userbox. |
Hello! I just tried using it and got the following error: (2003, "Can't connect to MySQL server on 'sql-s1' (113)") Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 06:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted the Centrum (multivitamin) article. As far as I know it was not tagged for speedy, nor would I think it qualifies under any of the CSD criteria, and it hasn't been around long enough for a prod or afd. Because you did not provide a deletion summary, I'm unclear why the article was deleted. The article was nonsense when I found it, however I turned it into a legitimate stub. Please let me know. Shadowjams ( talk) 06:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! I saw at ANI that you upped Mfield's temp block to a perm one. Just thought you might want to update the block template so that they realise the perm block. Cheers -- Ged UK 10:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
|
The Template Barnstar | |
I award you this Template Barnstar for outstanding work in the area of templates and coding all over wiki! BJ rules! — Rlevse • Talk • 02:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Wow, how kind of you. Thanks for doing that bit of coding work without even being asked; it was really appreciated! NuclearWarfare ( Talk) 02:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
Hey, I noticed that you removed the copyvio tag from 4/3 Battalion. While large portions of the text do come from .mil sites (as I noted at the article's entry at Wikipedia:Copyright problems), there are also portions that come from these sites. Can you explain why you believe copyvio is unwarranted? (I could be wrong about it, but I'd still like an explanation, so I'll know for next time). Thanks, Nikkimaria ( talk) 23:31, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hope that explains it. BJ Talk 23:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for following up on those; looked like generally a SPAcct & the attribution on those images wasn't consistent. Hope the OTRS follows. Skier Dude ( talk) 09:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Small problem BJ. The ref dates you created are fine except when there's a single digit. They should be 2009-04-09 vice 2009-4-9. The format gurus will be all over this. Is it possible to tweak your script and rerun? Let me know. Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Ping. You responded to the OTRS ticket on this one. Your opinion would be most welcome. - Dan Dank55 ( push to talk) 23:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for share your source code in Database reports. I'm going to use them in Spanish Wikipedia, and I'm going to learn a bit more about SQL queries. Thanks and happy programming. Emijrp ( talk) 20:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, you removed some passages from this article invoking BLP. Can I just ask if there's some deeper reason for this? I recognise the passages could do with a bit more sourcing and I cannot currently vouch for every factual bit in there, but the scandals as such are clearly notable, had massive media coverage at the time, and the articles cited do seem to cover them in the general outlines. Do you read Greek? By the way, BLP doesn't really apply, since the man is dead, unless you acted out of concern over the other persons mentioned? Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Your edit of Phil Mickelson removed the following sourced text: Mickelson is unpopular with his fellow players. In a poll by GQ magazine, Mickelson was named as one of the athletes most hated by other PGA tour players. [1]
Please be careful with your edits and not remove sourced material without explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.240.57 ( talk) 23:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
people have been telling me that I need permission to use my script and I have to get approval, they called it a bot, so why isn't it. Buɡboy52.4 ( talk) 00:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Why did the subject of the article related to this AFD request deletion? If it was the vandalism, you could tell them the article is protected and looked after at the moment. - Mgm| (talk) 11:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Please undelete the image; the seven day grace period of F5 hasn't elapsed yet. Sceptre ( talk) 00:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
You co-nomination was much obliged and shall be passed on down the generations as the gift that keeps on giving. Or...whatever. I'm trying to make this as non-generic as possible. HIGH-FIVE! -- Closedmouth ( talk) 15:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
As an admin who had previously blocked this user, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Returned_blocked_user.-- Otterathome ( talk) 20:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi BJ, could you tell me, please, what the source was for this image you deleted? I can re-upload it and get an OTRS ticket for it. Cheers, SlimVirgin talk| contribs
Hi, i've responded to your Afd at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Herb_(anti-cancer). cheers
87.69.177.35 ( talk) has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Bjweeks,
X
clamation point has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! '
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The user is requesting unblock with valid reasoning, ie 'why was I blocked'. I see no notices on their page. The block log says for SOCK, but no examples or diffs are provided. Can you take a moment to post evidence on their user space possibly using the template {{IPsock|username|evidence=[[WP:SOCK|foo]]}}. Cheers. Nja 247 07:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
I no longer have access to OTRS. Could you please explain why the subject requested deletion. The request alone is not enough for an AFD to finish in deletion. - Mgm| (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi - can you tell me why the AfD was courtesy blanked? Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 05:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Your bot posted a duplicate template on File:New Zelda Logo.jpg. I'm assuming that's a bug? Haipa Doragon ( talk • contributions) 20:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
You blocked WEWhistleBlower a couple of weeks ago and the user is asking for unblocking. I'm not sure I understand the block. I've placed the unblock request on-hold pending more information from you. Toddst1 ( talk) 21:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Bjweeks. I thought I would bring your attention to this discussion. You started an AfD from otrs:2009032610045579. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. This little note is just to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. In addition, I'm proposing merging Wikipedia:WikiProject Image Monitoring Group, because their aims seem to be very similar. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Discussion about redirecting those projects is located here. Thanks. PhilKnight ( talk) 19:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Wouldn't this be {{ PD-Art}} ? Jheald ( talk) 12:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Re. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red cunt hair (2nd nomination)
Hi there,
Regarding this AfD closure,
I'd appreciate it if you could please elaborate on how you came to your decision that the consensus was to delete the article.
Thanks, Chzz ► 15:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
(Copied this back from your archive, after Miszabot archived it, to give more time for a response Chzz ► 23:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC))
Re. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red cunt hair (2nd nomination)
Hi there,
Regarding this AfD closure,
I'd appreciate it if you could please elaborate on how you came to your decision that the consensus was to delete the article.
Thanks, Chzz ► 15:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm fully aware that AfD is not a vote; I just don't see any clear consensus. Therefore - and absolutely no offense intended, nothing personal at all;
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Red cunt hair. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Chzz ► 22:49, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've pinged your e-mail. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 02:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I find your comment at WP:ANI, "The image namespace is deprecated, nothing to see here", to be inappropriate, condescending, and derogatory. Admins are supposed to conduct themselves, what was the word, politely, I think it was. The image space is not deprecated, it is expanded into the file namespace, and either file or image can be used interchangeably, per editor preference. The point is that is annoying for a bot to change a specifically chosen and perfectly valid syntax for a less desirable syntax. The issue certainly has not been resolved, unless some changes were made that I am not aware of, although at present the bot is not active for who knows what reason. 199.125.109.126 ( talk) 03:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a question about this as I still use Image: over File: as general force-of-habit. Is this change coming from a bot that is going through and manually changing Image to File or should all editors do so? I am kinda confused. - NeutralHomer • Talk • May 3, 2009 @ 04:22
Hi. A couple of days ago you removed an enormous amount of coatracking on this article. I also removed it, yesterday, and today it was added again. I removed it again, but I have the feeling that that's temporary. There seem to be a couple of editors at work here, and the article, even without the heaps of praise, is nothing but a bunch of kudos. I have half a mind of cleaning it up, but it's only half a mind right now. This is just a heads-up, I guess; it's probably too early for measures like protection and such, but I have the feeling I may revisit you here again. Thanks, and keep up the good work, Drmies ( talk) 03:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Myself, I interpret 7 days as 7X24, not (6X24) + 12. The advantage of keeping this is to avoid contributing to what seems to be developing into a competition between different admins about who can close the most. (I'm not think of you particularly, btw). And I'm not here to object to any of the closings. DGG ( talk) 00:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for that, I thought I might have missed it. =) American Eagle ( talk) 02:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, it looks as if the AfD fails on grounds that too many people think it's keen. Would you like to officially propose the merger into Disk Utility which you (sensibly, IMO) suggested? — Scheinwerfermann T· C 06:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Bringing this back (unanswered) from your Archive 8:
Wouldn't this be {{ PD-Art}} ? Jheald ( talk) 12:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Are you going to restore this image, or do I have to take it to Deletion Review? Jheald ( talk) 15:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
You deleted the page I created as titled above. I don't seem to be getting much cooperation from you so have decided to message you directly. Please could you have a look at the article at your earliest convenience and judge the page now amendments have taken place, then make (if necessary) judgments on how we can improve the article, in order for it to be accepted ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by As200 ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:Kufic.JPG. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jheald ( talk) 08:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Recently, I proposed an investigation into the identity of NIMSOffice. This anonymous user clearly pushes his own agenda. Now NIMSOffice also proposed to investigate me, please see this page and my comments: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/GFZLab#Report_date_May_9_2009.2C_06:10_.28UTC.29
I felt restrained to make in my comment an important point. With good probability I can indicate who NIMSOffice is, but I don't want this information to be public (in case I am mistaken). For WP-investigation it may be useful, though.
I suspect that NIMSOffice is K.Iakoubovskii from NIMS, Japan, who couathored a paper with Dubrovinskaia. This person is also involved in journal STAM, which published Dubrovinskaia's paper within a few weeks from submission, and against referees' rejection). On the above page you will find NIMSOffice's claim that he never had personal interactions with Dubrovinskaia... If NIMSOffice=K.Iakoubovskii, this would be obviously wrong. Aoganov ( talk) 01:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Artem R. Oganov
Please see and comment here. -- mav ( talk) 14:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Honda-logo.svg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Honda-logo.svg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Honda-logo.svg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Name has been hidden via OS instead of renamed; saves log entries. Thank you. -- Avi ( talk) 04:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you please confirm that the permission for File:2009WVTeenUSA wiki.jpg and others from that same set came from the photographer Jonathan Carter? I find it rather strange that he would release the photos in that way. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 02:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Hiya,
It says that you deleted User talk:Eva.maria2009, but there's no deletion reason - I see the user removed a tag with their first edit, but, I wondered why you removed my 'welcome' note? I think there might have been an error on it - I was about to fix that, but it had gone. I expect you had good reasons; please let me know. Cheers! Chzz ► 05:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you explain why the page TCE Company, Inc was deleted. It was not structured in the form of advertisement or spam. The page listed references for the accomplishments of the company and the firm has been in business for over 20 years. How is the content of this page any different from the content of other pages such as NewEgg, CDW and Talkswitch. All pages follow the same structure of content.The only difference is the size of the company. Bgatza ( talk) 14:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Brian
Hi. I'm not sure what the protocol is with helping each other out with tickets, so I figured I'd just drop you a note. :) I've been talking to the author of Ticket:2009060310047417 at User talk:Lamerica (and could have saved you some time yesterday if something pretty horrific and time-consuming had not come up at WP:CP, eating the rest of my afternoon and turning my attention to other matters into mush. Sorry!), and he has written you back to clarify the intentions of his release. I wanted to point out that conversation for context in case it's helpful. Apologies if the right thing for me to do is to directly involve myself, but, again, I'm not sure what the protocol is, and I'm just not innately that bold. At least, not until I learn the ropes. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
The other ticket was in photosubmissions, I've merged them all and moved it to permissions-commons. I thought they wanted to release the PDF, which I uploaded here File:080312CWR_LR.pdf, I didn't realize there was an article and images derived from the PDF. I'll go fix it. BJ Talk 18:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you explain why the page TCE Company, Inc was deleted. It was not structured in the form of advertisement or spam. The page listed references for the accomplishments of the company and the firm has been in business for over 20 years. There was no difference in the content of this page as opposed to the content of other pages such as NewEgg, CDW and Talkswitch. All pages follow the same structure of content.The only difference is the size of the company Bgatza ( talk) 16:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Brian
You owe me one. Keegan talk 07:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Please could you tell me why the Alan Harvey article was deleted? I'm not entirely sure how the system works so would be grateful for feedback -- JHumphries ( talk) 21:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)