I have created and shared a powerpoint document with a recommended structure https://docs.google.com/a/netsells.co.uk/presentation/d/15LGtac7eHs5_ICDugabA-9FnMcKrdx9yFzC-txc4n8g/edit?usp=sharing that we can run through tomorrow. Feel free to post suggestions for changes here, so we can raise up our contributions tallies! Brancoady ( talk) 02:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
I am going to begin adding this box with a snapshot of data to the right hand side of the page, including the image in this section. As Chris has pointed out during a recent discussion about this, it is proving difficult to find references for her personal information (date of birth, place of birth etc.) Is anybody working on finding sources for this key data set? Brancoady ( talk) 02:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
I think the contents list perhaps contains links that are too long in length. For example, the co-authored work could perhaps only have the title of the work in the contents list, and detail the author and co authors in the section itself. I dont think I have ever seen a contents section appear like it does on ours anywhere else on wikipedia, so I suspect this does need some work even if not quite in the way I have suggested. Thoughts?
If you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Eastwood - the sections are written more in paragraphs as opposed to sub headings for each one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brancoady ( talk • contribs) 23:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Nick's early life section has a reference from Carolines Blog - I dont think this will be accepted as a reference directly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brancoady ( talk • contribs) 22:56, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Albeit a small point for discussion we should consider which language this article will be written in: US English or UK English. Given Caroline Haythornthwaite is indeed American, and are also many of the articles written by her, this will need deciding perhaps during our meeting on Friday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmhardi1 ( talk • contribs) 02:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
With regards my previous email where I stated a comment from the Tea House regarding the strength of our references - this of course was one persons viewpoint.
I guess we need to decided whether to remove/amend sections now, or wait and see if the article is approved before making any major changes? Nickjhanson ( talk) 08:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Just a thought we might consider looking at other groups pages to see if there are any links between there work and ours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marc1070 ( talk • contribs) 09:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
As you'll see I have acknowledged the 'lenient' feedback received on the article page and also made some changes based on his point 2) regarding her Christian name use. If anyone agrees with any of the individual feedback points made on the page it might be worth making a change. At least it shows we're asking for and acting upon wider audience Wikipedia feedback (engagement points central). Cmhardi1 ( talk) 22:16, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I think this may be something other groups fail to do, and so we should really try and do it. There are several images on Flickr ( http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=caroline%20haythornthwaite) of Caroline, but all appear to be 'all rights reserved'. As per the recommendations on Flickr help pages I am contacting the photographers to request permission to use the images. Hopefully one of them will permit this. Brancoady ( talk) 22:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Follow up: Not the greatest image in the world, but we are free to use this image. I will go about getting it uploaded and added! http://www.flickr.com/photos/brokenthoughts/498904415/ Brancoady ( talk) 23:01, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Further update - image was the wrong license! It was marked for non commercial use. Starting to get some responses however to my bombarding of Flickr users for permission to use! Brancoady ( talk) 23:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Spoken with the owner of the image who has very kindly changed the license! http://www.flickr.com/photos/brokenthoughts/498904415/ Brancoady ( talk) 00:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Brancoady ( talk) 00:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Just given the article a once over and noticed the final section External links needs something doing about. Might be worth us removing this entirely before the presentation tomorrow, unless Bran you want to place the In the news section into this section? Cmhardi1 ( talk) 23:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
I have created and shared a powerpoint document with a recommended structure https://docs.google.com/a/netsells.co.uk/presentation/d/15LGtac7eHs5_ICDugabA-9FnMcKrdx9yFzC-txc4n8g/edit?usp=sharing that we can run through tomorrow. Feel free to post suggestions for changes here, so we can raise up our contributions tallies! Brancoady ( talk) 02:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
I am going to begin adding this box with a snapshot of data to the right hand side of the page, including the image in this section. As Chris has pointed out during a recent discussion about this, it is proving difficult to find references for her personal information (date of birth, place of birth etc.) Is anybody working on finding sources for this key data set? Brancoady ( talk) 02:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
I think the contents list perhaps contains links that are too long in length. For example, the co-authored work could perhaps only have the title of the work in the contents list, and detail the author and co authors in the section itself. I dont think I have ever seen a contents section appear like it does on ours anywhere else on wikipedia, so I suspect this does need some work even if not quite in the way I have suggested. Thoughts?
If you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Eastwood - the sections are written more in paragraphs as opposed to sub headings for each one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brancoady ( talk • contribs) 23:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Nick's early life section has a reference from Carolines Blog - I dont think this will be accepted as a reference directly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brancoady ( talk • contribs) 22:56, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Albeit a small point for discussion we should consider which language this article will be written in: US English or UK English. Given Caroline Haythornthwaite is indeed American, and are also many of the articles written by her, this will need deciding perhaps during our meeting on Friday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmhardi1 ( talk • contribs) 02:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
With regards my previous email where I stated a comment from the Tea House regarding the strength of our references - this of course was one persons viewpoint.
I guess we need to decided whether to remove/amend sections now, or wait and see if the article is approved before making any major changes? Nickjhanson ( talk) 08:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Just a thought we might consider looking at other groups pages to see if there are any links between there work and ours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marc1070 ( talk • contribs) 09:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
As you'll see I have acknowledged the 'lenient' feedback received on the article page and also made some changes based on his point 2) regarding her Christian name use. If anyone agrees with any of the individual feedback points made on the page it might be worth making a change. At least it shows we're asking for and acting upon wider audience Wikipedia feedback (engagement points central). Cmhardi1 ( talk) 22:16, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I think this may be something other groups fail to do, and so we should really try and do it. There are several images on Flickr ( http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=caroline%20haythornthwaite) of Caroline, but all appear to be 'all rights reserved'. As per the recommendations on Flickr help pages I am contacting the photographers to request permission to use the images. Hopefully one of them will permit this. Brancoady ( talk) 22:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Follow up: Not the greatest image in the world, but we are free to use this image. I will go about getting it uploaded and added! http://www.flickr.com/photos/brokenthoughts/498904415/ Brancoady ( talk) 23:01, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Further update - image was the wrong license! It was marked for non commercial use. Starting to get some responses however to my bombarding of Flickr users for permission to use! Brancoady ( talk) 23:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Spoken with the owner of the image who has very kindly changed the license! http://www.flickr.com/photos/brokenthoughts/498904415/ Brancoady ( talk) 00:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Brancoady ( talk) 00:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Just given the article a once over and noticed the final section External links needs something doing about. Might be worth us removing this entirely before the presentation tomorrow, unless Bran you want to place the In the news section into this section? Cmhardi1 ( talk) 23:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)