You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TH43 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Redfarmer ( talk) 07:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
It's vandalism if you're a blocked user who won't leave it alone even after being blocked, which I have a feeling you are or else you'd be over trying to defend yourself against this charge in an attempt to avoid getting this account blocked. The fact you're more worried about restoring the same sorts of edits TH43 was makes me think you are him, however. For the record, the reason the table is still there is I'm looking for an adequate source for region 4. If you want to contribute and prove you're not TH43, do so then. Redfarmer ( talk) 12:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.The article List of DVDs for 7th Heaven has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Checker Fred (
talk)
19:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on List of DVDs for 7th Heaven, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Checker Fred (
talk)
19:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bouncerboo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Redfarmer ( talk) 13:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TH43 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Redfarmer ( talk) 07:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
It's vandalism if you're a blocked user who won't leave it alone even after being blocked, which I have a feeling you are or else you'd be over trying to defend yourself against this charge in an attempt to avoid getting this account blocked. The fact you're more worried about restoring the same sorts of edits TH43 was makes me think you are him, however. For the record, the reason the table is still there is I'm looking for an adequate source for region 4. If you want to contribute and prove you're not TH43, do so then. Redfarmer ( talk) 12:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.The article List of DVDs for 7th Heaven has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Checker Fred (
talk)
19:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on List of DVDs for 7th Heaven, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Checker Fred (
talk)
19:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bouncerboo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Redfarmer ( talk) 13:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)