Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
20:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I have done a rollback of your recent edits to the article, and stated so at the talk page. With such a controversial subject, you need to bring matters to the talk page. Adding 'West' to Jerusalem, for example, could be seen as agenda-driven POV. In addition, as some editors may be in a different part of the world from you, leave a little time for other editors to respond at the talk page before making multiple edits that could be construed as contentious. Best, A Sniper ( talk) 18:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello & welcome. I see you describe yourself as a "newbie," who is "just getting started." How did you acquaint yourself so well with the opinions of so many other editors? You seemed well-versed with their views and knew exactly where to find them. Also, you stated that you made a "hand full of pre-account edits." Are you at liberty to disclose what articles you edited? Best,-- Jiujitsuguy ( talk) 22:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Guys, if you have questions about the charming supporters of Israel who leave messages on my page you can ask me. But for the record, yes, I'm fairly often threatened with violence here or via emails by supporters of Israel. Others are too. The email aspect has been raised at ANI several times. The people often use anonymizing proxies, throw away accounts and certain mail servers to distribute hundreds of messages. Some people who support Israel are profoundly stupid, misinformed, morally corrupt, neofacist, despicable racist scum, who I assume have been indoctrinated and radicalized by the immense amount of hateful and dishonest nonsense available on the internet written by astoundingly unethical hate filled ultranationalists and ethnoreligious crazies. Israel doesn't have exclusive rights to those kind of supporters of course and the abuse is part of the nature of editing in the topic area. It's also irrelevant and counterproductive. Admins or others kindly remove the edits most of the time and revdel them sometimes as you can see here. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
We need dispute resolution? I thought we were just trying to get our heads around our positions. That seems a bit drastic - and I'm saying that as a mediator myself. Best, A Sniper ( talk) 21:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
bothhandsblack - care to elaborate on the sock puppet issues you are having? Soosim ( talk) 13:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
12:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Your long ANI post was made longer by the way you formatted diffs -- here we use square brackets [ ] instead of parentheses. I did the reformatting for you on ANI, which can reasonably interpreted as violating WP:TPO but perfectly consistent with WP:IAR, which I note as example of Wikipedia's incoherence. Also, if you going to edit Wikipedia:ECCN areas lots of patience will be required. See User:Nobody Ent/Other Duck Nobody Ent 13:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I fixed your format error at User talk:Brewcrewer for you, regarding your ANI notice. I hope that's ok with you. Caden cool 16:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Three single quotes ''' for bold, two ''' for italics Nobody Ent 16:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi: chiming in as I wonder whether you've seen Wikipedia:The Missing Manual? The actual book is linked at the bottom in downloadable form. I actually started editing Wikipedia because I wanted to learn the markup language '-) Oh and . . . Wikipedia:Emoticons. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia; we really are glad to have you aboard. Yngvadottir ( talk) 21:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi BothHandsBlack!
I'm not sure whether you are familiar with The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, but anyways. I happened to be wearing a pair of
Peril Sensitive Sunglasses
[2] while reading your
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents post that started "I'm a new editor on Wikipedia." Everything was fine until I got to "... in the Israel/Palestine topic area, the subject on which I intend to primarily work", at which point the Peril Sensitive Sunglasses became completely opaque.
--
Shirt58 (
talk)
01:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Please don't make 9kbytes comments. "I'm not X" would have sufficed. Remember, if you're not X, then that is what the outcome of the SPI will be. You don't know me, but I can tell you this based on own experience. -- Frederico1234 ( talk) 19:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I was just passing through your NGO Monitor article, and noticed that the funding section looks like the original one that was there before our little DRN chat, I was just wondering if there was any reason for that, decided it wasn't needed/wasn't right/hadn't got around to it/forgot about it/other more pressing issues? Just wondering. -- Despayre tête-à-tête 15:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
I accidentally put a wrong comment when I undid your last edit. The right comment is "Still, any claiming of connection with human rights would be an original research." Unfortunately, comments can't be edited. -- Yms ( talk) 20:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I have reverted your bold edits on Atheism, the next step is to discuss the issue on the atheism talk page. Read WP:BRD about this editing pattern. IRWolfie- ( talk) 10:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi I have reverted a couple of your edits in History of atheism, pending talk page discussion. Mcewan ( talk) 13:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Remember to leave an edit summary, you forgot to in Atheism. It helps to tie your edit summary to the talk page too. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 17:57, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
According to this diff, you removed a sourced passage from the article, and did so without comment as to the reason. While its generally more noble to write than to remove text, its understood that some things may need pruning. However its necessary to comment in detail as to why the removal is needed, and its highly desirable to make a new section on the talk page to explain your removal and discuss with others its necessity. Regards, - Stevertigo ( t | c) 21:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
20:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I have done a rollback of your recent edits to the article, and stated so at the talk page. With such a controversial subject, you need to bring matters to the talk page. Adding 'West' to Jerusalem, for example, could be seen as agenda-driven POV. In addition, as some editors may be in a different part of the world from you, leave a little time for other editors to respond at the talk page before making multiple edits that could be construed as contentious. Best, A Sniper ( talk) 18:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello & welcome. I see you describe yourself as a "newbie," who is "just getting started." How did you acquaint yourself so well with the opinions of so many other editors? You seemed well-versed with their views and knew exactly where to find them. Also, you stated that you made a "hand full of pre-account edits." Are you at liberty to disclose what articles you edited? Best,-- Jiujitsuguy ( talk) 22:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Guys, if you have questions about the charming supporters of Israel who leave messages on my page you can ask me. But for the record, yes, I'm fairly often threatened with violence here or via emails by supporters of Israel. Others are too. The email aspect has been raised at ANI several times. The people often use anonymizing proxies, throw away accounts and certain mail servers to distribute hundreds of messages. Some people who support Israel are profoundly stupid, misinformed, morally corrupt, neofacist, despicable racist scum, who I assume have been indoctrinated and radicalized by the immense amount of hateful and dishonest nonsense available on the internet written by astoundingly unethical hate filled ultranationalists and ethnoreligious crazies. Israel doesn't have exclusive rights to those kind of supporters of course and the abuse is part of the nature of editing in the topic area. It's also irrelevant and counterproductive. Admins or others kindly remove the edits most of the time and revdel them sometimes as you can see here. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
We need dispute resolution? I thought we were just trying to get our heads around our positions. That seems a bit drastic - and I'm saying that as a mediator myself. Best, A Sniper ( talk) 21:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
bothhandsblack - care to elaborate on the sock puppet issues you are having? Soosim ( talk) 13:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
12:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Your long ANI post was made longer by the way you formatted diffs -- here we use square brackets [ ] instead of parentheses. I did the reformatting for you on ANI, which can reasonably interpreted as violating WP:TPO but perfectly consistent with WP:IAR, which I note as example of Wikipedia's incoherence. Also, if you going to edit Wikipedia:ECCN areas lots of patience will be required. See User:Nobody Ent/Other Duck Nobody Ent 13:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I fixed your format error at User talk:Brewcrewer for you, regarding your ANI notice. I hope that's ok with you. Caden cool 16:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Three single quotes ''' for bold, two ''' for italics Nobody Ent 16:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi: chiming in as I wonder whether you've seen Wikipedia:The Missing Manual? The actual book is linked at the bottom in downloadable form. I actually started editing Wikipedia because I wanted to learn the markup language '-) Oh and . . . Wikipedia:Emoticons. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia; we really are glad to have you aboard. Yngvadottir ( talk) 21:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi BothHandsBlack!
I'm not sure whether you are familiar with The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, but anyways. I happened to be wearing a pair of
Peril Sensitive Sunglasses
[2] while reading your
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents post that started "I'm a new editor on Wikipedia." Everything was fine until I got to "... in the Israel/Palestine topic area, the subject on which I intend to primarily work", at which point the Peril Sensitive Sunglasses became completely opaque.
--
Shirt58 (
talk)
01:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Please don't make 9kbytes comments. "I'm not X" would have sufficed. Remember, if you're not X, then that is what the outcome of the SPI will be. You don't know me, but I can tell you this based on own experience. -- Frederico1234 ( talk) 19:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I was just passing through your NGO Monitor article, and noticed that the funding section looks like the original one that was there before our little DRN chat, I was just wondering if there was any reason for that, decided it wasn't needed/wasn't right/hadn't got around to it/forgot about it/other more pressing issues? Just wondering. -- Despayre tête-à-tête 15:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
I accidentally put a wrong comment when I undid your last edit. The right comment is "Still, any claiming of connection with human rights would be an original research." Unfortunately, comments can't be edited. -- Yms ( talk) 20:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I have reverted your bold edits on Atheism, the next step is to discuss the issue on the atheism talk page. Read WP:BRD about this editing pattern. IRWolfie- ( talk) 10:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi I have reverted a couple of your edits in History of atheism, pending talk page discussion. Mcewan ( talk) 13:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Remember to leave an edit summary, you forgot to in Atheism. It helps to tie your edit summary to the talk page too. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 17:57, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
According to this diff, you removed a sourced passage from the article, and did so without comment as to the reason. While its generally more noble to write than to remove text, its understood that some things may need pruning. However its necessary to comment in detail as to why the removal is needed, and its highly desirable to make a new section on the talk page to explain your removal and discuss with others its necessity. Regards, - Stevertigo ( t | c) 21:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)