When you completely clear and move everything into an archive, it makes it difficult for others to follow the thread of comments. I know you think you have your reasons, but it would be nice if you tried to followed wikipedia conventions. Thanks. -- Jerry ( Talk) 03:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Why did you add a link to the talk page at the top of the Tennessee article? This breaks several Wikipedia conventions and is not appropriate. Kaldari 16:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I fixed the TN talk link issue for you. The NPOV tag already has the link to the talk page, and it's formatted much more nicely. No big deal. Rklawton 16:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Just to remind you: we do not have a talk_talk: namespace. Please do not attempt to use it. -- RHaworth 18:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Since you did not even bother to look at my edit before you reverted it, perhaps you would be interested to know that my version used "Southeastern", not "Southern". Please edit with civility. Kaldari 19:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
On a side note, I'm thinking state trivia like state flower, etc. might have a place in the State box so all states are uniform in these matters. Or perhaps we can make a second box for state trivia. Again, the idea is to make it easy for people to generate a list of all the state flowers, etc., without having to bully their way through fifty articles. Rklawton 20:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
There is no place for negative bias at Wikipedia. I'm trying hard to comply and I believe everyone else should make the same effort. -- Bookofsecrets 07:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Bookofsecrets makes wild claims and is basing his original research on a road map. STOP or get expelled from Wikipedia. Rjensen 22:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
You are required to mention what your issue with the POV of an article is on the talk page when you place the notice. You have not done that on any of the recent articles you marked. I removed the notices until you can state your complaints. Simply saying "see Tennessee" is unsufficient, every article is individual. -- Golbez 23:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
This conversation has gotten "boring" and I will make to further comments on this subject. Those who desire to see things foolishly will just have to do so. Since this is my talkpage please take this debate elsewhere. -- Bookofsecrets 00:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
You wrote: Nobody ask for your petty opinion. I do not have to agree with the Census Bureau, you or anyone else for that matter. So I'd suggest that you zip the lip.
You are absolutely right. You diod not ask for my opinion. Unfortunately, I do not need your permission to post on an article's talk page, buddy. I do not answer to you simply because you say so.
Also, you are right in the fact that you do not have to agree with the Census Bureau, me, or anyone else. But guess what? If you can't agree with anyone, then get your high-tailed ass off Wikipedia, because we do not need you here.
Thank you for your time, and please do not spoil my Talk page with your inintelligent filth again. P.H. - Kyoukan, UASC 23:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
I do not answer to you simply because you say so.
If you can't agree with anyone, then get your high-tailed ass off Wikipedia, because we do not need you here.
Please be civil and do not make personal attacks against other users. [1] [2] [3] [4] You have had a long history of having an inexplicably hostile and discriminatory attitude toward other users. However, time and time again, the community has continued to assume good faith on your part and hoped that you would improve your behavior. I suppose we were wrong. Remember back to your unblocking just last week; you agreed to "follow wikipedia policies to the best of [your] ability." [5] [6] [7] Your repeated, brazen outbursts of utterly degrading and completely unfounded insults are completely unacceptable. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 talk 00:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
When you completely clear and move everything into an archive, it makes it difficult for others to follow the thread of comments. I know you think you have your reasons, but it would be nice if you tried to followed wikipedia conventions. Thanks. -- Jerry ( Talk) 03:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Why did you add a link to the talk page at the top of the Tennessee article? This breaks several Wikipedia conventions and is not appropriate. Kaldari 16:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I fixed the TN talk link issue for you. The NPOV tag already has the link to the talk page, and it's formatted much more nicely. No big deal. Rklawton 16:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Just to remind you: we do not have a talk_talk: namespace. Please do not attempt to use it. -- RHaworth 18:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Since you did not even bother to look at my edit before you reverted it, perhaps you would be interested to know that my version used "Southeastern", not "Southern". Please edit with civility. Kaldari 19:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
On a side note, I'm thinking state trivia like state flower, etc. might have a place in the State box so all states are uniform in these matters. Or perhaps we can make a second box for state trivia. Again, the idea is to make it easy for people to generate a list of all the state flowers, etc., without having to bully their way through fifty articles. Rklawton 20:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
There is no place for negative bias at Wikipedia. I'm trying hard to comply and I believe everyone else should make the same effort. -- Bookofsecrets 07:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Bookofsecrets makes wild claims and is basing his original research on a road map. STOP or get expelled from Wikipedia. Rjensen 22:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
You are required to mention what your issue with the POV of an article is on the talk page when you place the notice. You have not done that on any of the recent articles you marked. I removed the notices until you can state your complaints. Simply saying "see Tennessee" is unsufficient, every article is individual. -- Golbez 23:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
This conversation has gotten "boring" and I will make to further comments on this subject. Those who desire to see things foolishly will just have to do so. Since this is my talkpage please take this debate elsewhere. -- Bookofsecrets 00:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
You wrote: Nobody ask for your petty opinion. I do not have to agree with the Census Bureau, you or anyone else for that matter. So I'd suggest that you zip the lip.
You are absolutely right. You diod not ask for my opinion. Unfortunately, I do not need your permission to post on an article's talk page, buddy. I do not answer to you simply because you say so.
Also, you are right in the fact that you do not have to agree with the Census Bureau, me, or anyone else. But guess what? If you can't agree with anyone, then get your high-tailed ass off Wikipedia, because we do not need you here.
Thank you for your time, and please do not spoil my Talk page with your inintelligent filth again. P.H. - Kyoukan, UASC 23:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
I do not answer to you simply because you say so.
If you can't agree with anyone, then get your high-tailed ass off Wikipedia, because we do not need you here.
Please be civil and do not make personal attacks against other users. [1] [2] [3] [4] You have had a long history of having an inexplicably hostile and discriminatory attitude toward other users. However, time and time again, the community has continued to assume good faith on your part and hoped that you would improve your behavior. I suppose we were wrong. Remember back to your unblocking just last week; you agreed to "follow wikipedia policies to the best of [your] ability." [5] [6] [7] Your repeated, brazen outbursts of utterly degrading and completely unfounded insults are completely unacceptable. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 talk 00:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)