|
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Armed Forces of Mauritania, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 18:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Srikanth (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OTT. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Programme.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello Bonadart! Your additions to
National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added
copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent
copyright and
plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Srikanth (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 05:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk) 20:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. I just came across your recent article, which was about a very interesting and inspiring woman. Unfortunately, you published it directly into the encyclopedia in a very poor state, with many issues. I corrected some of these issues, but would encourage you to learn more about the English Wikipedia's policies if you plan to continue contributing here.
In addition to lacking proper references for most of the statements in this article, many sentences were completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia, sounding more like a promotional biography. Additionally, you have been overlinking to pages which have no reason to connect, and leaving gaps in the flow of the article. You even had two section headings which had no content in them- this is fine for a draft but completely ridiculous in article space.
Please consider submitting your drafts for review through the Articles for Creation process moving forward, as they are likely to get deleted in the future rather than have someone try to clean them up for you as I did. For this particular article, since it's already been published, I encourage you to find more sources to reference where I've marked "citation needed" tags, to bring this article up to a basic level required by en.wiki. Definitely *do not* continue to add information without citing sources, or creating section headers with no content. Chiselinccc ( talk) 02:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Rajalakshmi S.J. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti ( talk) 17:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article
Mr. & Mrs. Mahi did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. It is always better to wait for websites like bollywoodhungama.com to update the boxoffice numbers. You can also add a reliable source from
WP:ICTFSOURCES list with updated boxoffice number.
RangersRus (
talk) 18:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Armed Forces of Mauritania, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 18:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Srikanth (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OTT. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Programme.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello Bonadart! Your additions to
National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added
copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent
copyright and
plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Srikanth (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 05:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk) 20:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. I just came across your recent article, which was about a very interesting and inspiring woman. Unfortunately, you published it directly into the encyclopedia in a very poor state, with many issues. I corrected some of these issues, but would encourage you to learn more about the English Wikipedia's policies if you plan to continue contributing here.
In addition to lacking proper references for most of the statements in this article, many sentences were completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia, sounding more like a promotional biography. Additionally, you have been overlinking to pages which have no reason to connect, and leaving gaps in the flow of the article. You even had two section headings which had no content in them- this is fine for a draft but completely ridiculous in article space.
Please consider submitting your drafts for review through the Articles for Creation process moving forward, as they are likely to get deleted in the future rather than have someone try to clean them up for you as I did. For this particular article, since it's already been published, I encourage you to find more sources to reference where I've marked "citation needed" tags, to bring this article up to a basic level required by en.wiki. Definitely *do not* continue to add information without citing sources, or creating section headers with no content. Chiselinccc ( talk) 02:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Rajalakshmi S.J. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti ( talk) 17:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article
Mr. & Mrs. Mahi did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. It is always better to wait for websites like bollywoodhungama.com to update the boxoffice numbers. You can also add a reliable source from
WP:ICTFSOURCES list with updated boxoffice number.
RangersRus (
talk) 18:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)