Hi!
Thanks for your message. I think that I have done a pretty good job of expressed my concerns in regards of this issue. The problem seem to be that a faction of 5-7 editors fanatically push for their own pov and simply overturn any attempts to uphold the guidelines of wikipedia by numbers alone.
How what way is my approach flawed?
Danz23 ( talk) 21:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear friend, I must decline your offer. However I thank you for your fairness and
urge you keep in touch and be a part of the constructive process.
You can help by bringing the issue to notice of more neutral editors so a discussion network of neutral parties created. I am sure that all further issues can be discussed in a way compliant with the guidelines of wikipedia.
Hi!
Thanks for your message. I think that I have done a pretty good job of expressed my concerns in regards of this issue. The problem seem to be that a faction of 5-7 editors fanatically push for their own pov and simply overturn any attempts to uphold the guidelines of wikipedia by numbers alone.
How what way is my approach flawed?
Danz23 ( talk) 21:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear friend, I must decline your offer. However I thank you for your fairness and
urge you keep in touch and be a part of the constructive process.
You can help by bringing the issue to notice of more neutral editors so a discussion network of neutral parties created. I am sure that all further issues can be discussed in a way compliant with the guidelines of wikipedia.