Hello,
I saw your plot tag on the above movie and having spent the afternoon watching the movie, I reduced the plot substantially taking out plot bloats etc. Would appreciate it if you could take a once over and just see if I have crossed my t's and dotted my i's.
Thank you! :)
MisterShiney (Come say hi) 17:28, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings, user Bobbyandbeans. I see (after making considerable edits to the Bullitt page one end to the other you are avidly patroling movie pages with overlong plot sections, adding tags and cutting them down to fit under 700 words. Do understand that the 700 word "limit" is a suggestion, a yardstick, not an iron rule. Half or so the edits I made to Bullitt's plot section were general clean-up of sentence structure and such, the other half small additions in content to make otherwise unclear or insufficiently developed plot points appropriately so. I have since found they bring the section to 717 words. I'd appreciate your understanding the above and not mincing the effort.
Where articles are needlessly or grossly beyond the suggested plot section size keep up the good work. Yours, Wikiuser100 ( talk) 16:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I took 265 words out, accidentally ending 17 over in the plot section. What you call "max" is a suggested max. Only good faith was involved. I've invested more effort here defending the 17 under attack than making dozens of edits on the page at issue.
Wikipedia just takes a survey to learn why it loses so many good editors. They only need review exchanges like this.
All the same, your forebearance in not launching an edit war over this is appreciated. Cheers Wikiuser100 ( talk) 20:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Please take care not to engage in edit warring. Neither version is a "bad" version, so it's not necessary to be so forceful about it, especially if we're discussing the possibility of AfD. Erik ( talk | contribs) 16:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
If "American-British" is inaccurate, it doesnt' matter how long it stood there. Wrong is wrong. I just visited the page for the first time the other day and noticed the inaccuracies and poor references, and that a nom for deletion is warranted, and decided on the cleanup and clarifications before that happened. But, no good deed goes unpunished. I'm bowing out of this here and there, so good luck. Bobbyandbeans ( talk) 17:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page Little Mix, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. – anemone projectors– 17:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Bobbyandbeans!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
05:39, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
|
Hello, Bobbyandbeans. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Greg Sestero".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Interstellarity ( talk) 14:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
I saw your plot tag on the above movie and having spent the afternoon watching the movie, I reduced the plot substantially taking out plot bloats etc. Would appreciate it if you could take a once over and just see if I have crossed my t's and dotted my i's.
Thank you! :)
MisterShiney (Come say hi) 17:28, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings, user Bobbyandbeans. I see (after making considerable edits to the Bullitt page one end to the other you are avidly patroling movie pages with overlong plot sections, adding tags and cutting them down to fit under 700 words. Do understand that the 700 word "limit" is a suggestion, a yardstick, not an iron rule. Half or so the edits I made to Bullitt's plot section were general clean-up of sentence structure and such, the other half small additions in content to make otherwise unclear or insufficiently developed plot points appropriately so. I have since found they bring the section to 717 words. I'd appreciate your understanding the above and not mincing the effort.
Where articles are needlessly or grossly beyond the suggested plot section size keep up the good work. Yours, Wikiuser100 ( talk) 16:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I took 265 words out, accidentally ending 17 over in the plot section. What you call "max" is a suggested max. Only good faith was involved. I've invested more effort here defending the 17 under attack than making dozens of edits on the page at issue.
Wikipedia just takes a survey to learn why it loses so many good editors. They only need review exchanges like this.
All the same, your forebearance in not launching an edit war over this is appreciated. Cheers Wikiuser100 ( talk) 20:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Please take care not to engage in edit warring. Neither version is a "bad" version, so it's not necessary to be so forceful about it, especially if we're discussing the possibility of AfD. Erik ( talk | contribs) 16:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
If "American-British" is inaccurate, it doesnt' matter how long it stood there. Wrong is wrong. I just visited the page for the first time the other day and noticed the inaccuracies and poor references, and that a nom for deletion is warranted, and decided on the cleanup and clarifications before that happened. But, no good deed goes unpunished. I'm bowing out of this here and there, so good luck. Bobbyandbeans ( talk) 17:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page Little Mix, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. – anemone projectors– 17:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Bobbyandbeans!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
05:39, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
|
Hello, Bobbyandbeans. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Greg Sestero".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Interstellarity ( talk) 14:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)