Please be sure to sign your posts while adding a new discussion. Feel free to ask or discuss anything whatsoever.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Bbb23 (
talk)
16:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Bobby Southside ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't know why you have blocked me, Sir. If it was because of my user page then i must tell you that im an experienced editor. If i wasn't, i wouldn't have been able to make infobox. I was so far doing edits through IP address but now i thought to make an account. Since there were many wikipedians who used witty things to make their user page attractive, i was doing the same. It was just for fun and nothing else. Moreover, im really here to edit wikipedia and help editors in matters of interest. Please sir.. This is unfair. Im totally devoted to my work and i can prove it any time you want. Also its been just 3 hours since i joined so my first aim was to simply make my user page. Regards Bobby Southside ( talk) 16:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You aren't required to(and shouldn't) post private information about yourself on your user page- nor are you required to have any content on your user page at all. User pages are for introducing yourself to the Wikipedia community in the context of your Wikipedia editing. You chose to post nonsense on it instead. If you had built up a history of productive contributions prior to editing your user page, it might have been handled differently- but this appeared to the casual observer that you weren't here to contribute to this project. If you know of other such inappropriate user pages, feel free to point them out so they can be addressed if you are unblocked(and see other stuff exists)- but in order for that to happen, you need to indicate what productive contributions you want to make. As you have not done that, I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 18:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is a difference between posting "witty things" and clearly false information- unless you are a Martian professional wrestler who believes in alien rights. Now that you know such material is not acceptable, what constructive contributions do you want to make to this project? 331dot ( talk) 17:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sir, please try to understand. I don't want to expose my private life in public. User pages for me are intended make people aware of the user's character. Like i have saw many users using userboxes which even contains messages like "This user doesn't give a f***" and etc. These too are false info but are intended to make the audience laugh and nothing at all. I would after adding the infobox add userboxes with no such content . This act isn't that big to be awarded a block as many other users have made their talk pages like this. I know the policies too and would never try to harm them intentionally. Regards Bobby Southside ( talk) 17:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- At the end, i just want to say that please give me a chance to prove that i can edit productively on wikipedia. I can not have any edit history in just 3 hours. Please give it a second thought, sir. I have good knowledge about football, rock music, Indian laws etc. Please unblock so i can prove my worth.
Bobby Southside (
talk)
18:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- You are free to make another unblock request, which another administrator will review. 331dot ( talk) 18:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Bobby Southside ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for adding an infobox on my user page of a hypothetical person named the same as my username. It is related to a game named WR3D. I made it because i heard that users with good and exceptional user pages are awarded. So i was making a unique and funny user page and suddenly all my hard work did go in vain as my page was blocked. The man said that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. But it was never considered that i joined just 3 hours ago and you can't at all expect from me constructive edits in such less time and i was busy making my user page. Also noway that infobox could be used for commercialisation, personal attacks, misleading etc. But anyways, after reading the guide for appealing blocks, i want to say that i have fully understood what i was blocked for and i swear not to repeat the mistake again. Again, i want to say that all that was just for fun purpose and no personal commercialisation as having a funny page excites your viewers to see more of your page's content. Hence, i want that please unblock me. Thats what has been guided to me to do and i have done exactly that. Following all this, now there is no need for me to be blocked. The thing for which i have been blocked here clearly seems to be the section (Long-term agenda inconsistent with building an encylopedia) but it should have been noted that 3 hours is not long term. And the other and last section of rules that can be put here is (Editing in user space), for this case i want to say that firstly a user needs to make his user page to let the other peoples interact with him with more comfort, otherwise it would make a bad impression and considering just few hours of editorial work one can not say that the user is completely devoted to editing his user page and not articles. Thanks and thats all. Regards Bobby Southside ( talk) 04:54, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Nobody needs a user page. Spending your time crafting a fake user page instead of contributing to Wikipedia shows the block is appropriate. You could have been unblocked if you demonstrated any understanding of WP:NOT, but instead you've doubled down on your edits. Yamla ( talk) 11:15, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Why are you all being so critical of a user who has yet not known fully about wikipedia. I said that i have understood the reason and i won't do that again, so why? In guide to appealing blocks, it was said that you should say this so i have said and thats enough. What you guys need from me in order to unblock me. I have never saw any user being indefinitely blocked for such a small thing and even after he apologized and gave proper reasons for his editing.
I once again say that please unblock me, i will never do that again. Bobby Southside ( talk) 11:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- You have been told by me and Yamla what you need to do to get unblocked(demonstrate that you understand WP:NOT and tell exactly what contributions you want to make). If you make another request, it will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot ( talk) 11:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oh my goodness. This is horrific what is going on here. I don't need to tell you thousand times, isnt it? It feels like you both haven't read my whole unblock reason otherwise you would have surely got your answer. I said that i have great knowledge about football association, rock music, Indian law and many more. Also i even told you the two problems i was liable for and also justified that none of them could be actually used to show me a criminal(as i am treated here). I know that its not compulsory for a user to have user pages but every user has his aspiration(why you both have made user pages if it means nothing). I want to be a master editor like you all and a master editor always has a well managed user page. I still standby that i have not done any wrong and if you would have given me some time i would soon have started to edit other pages. I know it fully that wikipedia isnt social networking site and im not a fan of social networking sites too. Im just here to contribute to my user page which is my property and articles which are wikipedia's property. Nobody shall decide what should be in my property unless it causes problems to other. Im not being offensive but im a little provoked here as my appeals are not even being considered fully. I have said many times that how can you judge that i was not here to contribute to wikipedia but just for myself considering only 3 hours of editorial history. Im sorry if it hurts you both. But really, not only i but no newcomer deserves this kind of treatment when it has been said by wikipedia policies too that try to make the user understand his mistakes and not make him flee away. No warnings, No time but only an indefinite block was what was given me. This seems to be an exceptional case.
Bobby Southside (
talk)
12:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is certainly not true that "a master editor always has a well managed user page". Many users have been here for years and even over a decade and have no user page at all. While you have a degree of control over what appears on your user page, it is not "your property" and is subject to Wikipedia policies. You saying "Im just here to contribute to my user page" is why you are blocked and will remain so until you do what you have been asked to do. You don't have to be a "master editor" to contribute, but you do need to show what contributions you want to make(personal knowledge is not sufficient). If you are going to make another unblock request that will be reviewed by someone else, please do so; if it is not productive, or you post another long comment, your ability to edit this page may be removed. 331dot ( talk) 12:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- It seems that you won't try to undsrstand what i want to say. So just stay away from this user page for sometime. Im again doing an unblock request and i don't need any interference.
Bobby Southside ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
PLEASE READ THIS REQUEST FULLY FOR SAKE OF HUMANITY. I was blocked for adding an infobox on my user page of a hypothetical person named the same as my username. It is related to a game named WR3D. I made it because i heard that users with good and exceptional user pages are awarded. So i was making a unique and funny user page and suddenly all my hard work did go in vain as my page was blocked. The man said that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. But it was never considered that i joined just 3 hours ago and you can't at all expect from me constructive edits in such less time and i was busy making my user page. Also noway that infobox could be used for commercialisation, personal attacks, misleading etc. But anyways, after reading the guide for appealing blocks, i want to say that i have fully understood what i was blocked for and i swear not to repeat the mistake again. Again, i want to say that all that was just for fun purpose and no personal commercialisation as having a funny page excites your viewers to see more of your page's content. Hence, i want that please unblock me. Thats what has been guided to me to do and i have done exactly that. Following all this, now there is no need for me to be blocked. The thing for which i have been blocked here clearly seems to be the section (Long-term agenda inconsistent with building an encylopedia) but it should have been noted that 3 hours is not long term. And the other and last section of rules that can be put here is (Editing in user space), for this case i want to say that firstly a user needs to make his user page to let the other peoples interact with him with more comfort, otherwise it would make a bad impression and considering just few hours of editorial work one can not say that the user is completely devoted to editing his user page and not articles. Look sir, everybody is not of the same type. Everybody has different aspirations and so i was making my account balanced with great userpage as well as great work. But if keeping my userpage empty is what i need to for getting unblocked. Then im ready for it. Also i want to edit pages related football association, rock and roll music, indian laws and astronomy. All in one, please unblock me, i would follow everything you ask me to. Regards Bobby Southside ( talk) 12:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I suggest WP:CIR and WP:IDHT applies here and talk page access should be revoked by the next reviewing admin. -- Yamla ( talk) 13:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
This is a straight forward personal attack on me by him. And no disruptive editing is here. And the WP:CIR never applies here as i am fully aware of english and moreover the message above is a complete witness of that. I have knowledges about syntax too and thats why i had made an infobox well. WP:IDHT too can't be applied here. I haven't disrupted anything. I have just add some unblock request. Now for them, making an unblock request is disruptive because they don't want the user to ever get justice. Moreover, some peoples have broke the wikipedia laws by consistently trying to provoke a new editor by deleting his user page, then blocking him without any warning. Wikipedia policy states that no editor should haunt other users away and also that blocking should be done after negligence to Warning which in my case wasn't even provided. I doubt if the peoples who seem to be on a war against me are the only one who used to edit using that account cuz considering there no. of edits they should have proper knowledge about Wikipedia Policies which the case doesn't seems to be. Bobby Southside ( talk) 13:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Your latest unblock request is almost identical to the previous one. That plus your attack on Yamla have resulted in my revocation of your access to this page.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
-
Checkuser note: This is now a CheckUser block.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
14:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
-
Please be sure to sign your posts while adding a new discussion. Feel free to ask or discuss anything whatsoever.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Bbb23 (
talk)
16:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Bobby Southside ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't know why you have blocked me, Sir. If it was because of my user page then i must tell you that im an experienced editor. If i wasn't, i wouldn't have been able to make infobox. I was so far doing edits through IP address but now i thought to make an account. Since there were many wikipedians who used witty things to make their user page attractive, i was doing the same. It was just for fun and nothing else. Moreover, im really here to edit wikipedia and help editors in matters of interest. Please sir.. This is unfair. Im totally devoted to my work and i can prove it any time you want. Also its been just 3 hours since i joined so my first aim was to simply make my user page. Regards Bobby Southside ( talk) 16:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You aren't required to(and shouldn't) post private information about yourself on your user page- nor are you required to have any content on your user page at all. User pages are for introducing yourself to the Wikipedia community in the context of your Wikipedia editing. You chose to post nonsense on it instead. If you had built up a history of productive contributions prior to editing your user page, it might have been handled differently- but this appeared to the casual observer that you weren't here to contribute to this project. If you know of other such inappropriate user pages, feel free to point them out so they can be addressed if you are unblocked(and see other stuff exists)- but in order for that to happen, you need to indicate what productive contributions you want to make. As you have not done that, I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 18:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is a difference between posting "witty things" and clearly false information- unless you are a Martian professional wrestler who believes in alien rights. Now that you know such material is not acceptable, what constructive contributions do you want to make to this project? 331dot ( talk) 17:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sir, please try to understand. I don't want to expose my private life in public. User pages for me are intended make people aware of the user's character. Like i have saw many users using userboxes which even contains messages like "This user doesn't give a f***" and etc. These too are false info but are intended to make the audience laugh and nothing at all. I would after adding the infobox add userboxes with no such content . This act isn't that big to be awarded a block as many other users have made their talk pages like this. I know the policies too and would never try to harm them intentionally. Regards Bobby Southside ( talk) 17:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- At the end, i just want to say that please give me a chance to prove that i can edit productively on wikipedia. I can not have any edit history in just 3 hours. Please give it a second thought, sir. I have good knowledge about football, rock music, Indian laws etc. Please unblock so i can prove my worth.
Bobby Southside (
talk)
18:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- You are free to make another unblock request, which another administrator will review. 331dot ( talk) 18:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Bobby Southside ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for adding an infobox on my user page of a hypothetical person named the same as my username. It is related to a game named WR3D. I made it because i heard that users with good and exceptional user pages are awarded. So i was making a unique and funny user page and suddenly all my hard work did go in vain as my page was blocked. The man said that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. But it was never considered that i joined just 3 hours ago and you can't at all expect from me constructive edits in such less time and i was busy making my user page. Also noway that infobox could be used for commercialisation, personal attacks, misleading etc. But anyways, after reading the guide for appealing blocks, i want to say that i have fully understood what i was blocked for and i swear not to repeat the mistake again. Again, i want to say that all that was just for fun purpose and no personal commercialisation as having a funny page excites your viewers to see more of your page's content. Hence, i want that please unblock me. Thats what has been guided to me to do and i have done exactly that. Following all this, now there is no need for me to be blocked. The thing for which i have been blocked here clearly seems to be the section (Long-term agenda inconsistent with building an encylopedia) but it should have been noted that 3 hours is not long term. And the other and last section of rules that can be put here is (Editing in user space), for this case i want to say that firstly a user needs to make his user page to let the other peoples interact with him with more comfort, otherwise it would make a bad impression and considering just few hours of editorial work one can not say that the user is completely devoted to editing his user page and not articles. Thanks and thats all. Regards Bobby Southside ( talk) 04:54, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Nobody needs a user page. Spending your time crafting a fake user page instead of contributing to Wikipedia shows the block is appropriate. You could have been unblocked if you demonstrated any understanding of WP:NOT, but instead you've doubled down on your edits. Yamla ( talk) 11:15, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Why are you all being so critical of a user who has yet not known fully about wikipedia. I said that i have understood the reason and i won't do that again, so why? In guide to appealing blocks, it was said that you should say this so i have said and thats enough. What you guys need from me in order to unblock me. I have never saw any user being indefinitely blocked for such a small thing and even after he apologized and gave proper reasons for his editing.
I once again say that please unblock me, i will never do that again. Bobby Southside ( talk) 11:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- You have been told by me and Yamla what you need to do to get unblocked(demonstrate that you understand WP:NOT and tell exactly what contributions you want to make). If you make another request, it will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot ( talk) 11:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oh my goodness. This is horrific what is going on here. I don't need to tell you thousand times, isnt it? It feels like you both haven't read my whole unblock reason otherwise you would have surely got your answer. I said that i have great knowledge about football association, rock music, Indian law and many more. Also i even told you the two problems i was liable for and also justified that none of them could be actually used to show me a criminal(as i am treated here). I know that its not compulsory for a user to have user pages but every user has his aspiration(why you both have made user pages if it means nothing). I want to be a master editor like you all and a master editor always has a well managed user page. I still standby that i have not done any wrong and if you would have given me some time i would soon have started to edit other pages. I know it fully that wikipedia isnt social networking site and im not a fan of social networking sites too. Im just here to contribute to my user page which is my property and articles which are wikipedia's property. Nobody shall decide what should be in my property unless it causes problems to other. Im not being offensive but im a little provoked here as my appeals are not even being considered fully. I have said many times that how can you judge that i was not here to contribute to wikipedia but just for myself considering only 3 hours of editorial history. Im sorry if it hurts you both. But really, not only i but no newcomer deserves this kind of treatment when it has been said by wikipedia policies too that try to make the user understand his mistakes and not make him flee away. No warnings, No time but only an indefinite block was what was given me. This seems to be an exceptional case.
Bobby Southside (
talk)
12:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is certainly not true that "a master editor always has a well managed user page". Many users have been here for years and even over a decade and have no user page at all. While you have a degree of control over what appears on your user page, it is not "your property" and is subject to Wikipedia policies. You saying "Im just here to contribute to my user page" is why you are blocked and will remain so until you do what you have been asked to do. You don't have to be a "master editor" to contribute, but you do need to show what contributions you want to make(personal knowledge is not sufficient). If you are going to make another unblock request that will be reviewed by someone else, please do so; if it is not productive, or you post another long comment, your ability to edit this page may be removed. 331dot ( talk) 12:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- It seems that you won't try to undsrstand what i want to say. So just stay away from this user page for sometime. Im again doing an unblock request and i don't need any interference.
Bobby Southside ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
PLEASE READ THIS REQUEST FULLY FOR SAKE OF HUMANITY. I was blocked for adding an infobox on my user page of a hypothetical person named the same as my username. It is related to a game named WR3D. I made it because i heard that users with good and exceptional user pages are awarded. So i was making a unique and funny user page and suddenly all my hard work did go in vain as my page was blocked. The man said that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. But it was never considered that i joined just 3 hours ago and you can't at all expect from me constructive edits in such less time and i was busy making my user page. Also noway that infobox could be used for commercialisation, personal attacks, misleading etc. But anyways, after reading the guide for appealing blocks, i want to say that i have fully understood what i was blocked for and i swear not to repeat the mistake again. Again, i want to say that all that was just for fun purpose and no personal commercialisation as having a funny page excites your viewers to see more of your page's content. Hence, i want that please unblock me. Thats what has been guided to me to do and i have done exactly that. Following all this, now there is no need for me to be blocked. The thing for which i have been blocked here clearly seems to be the section (Long-term agenda inconsistent with building an encylopedia) but it should have been noted that 3 hours is not long term. And the other and last section of rules that can be put here is (Editing in user space), for this case i want to say that firstly a user needs to make his user page to let the other peoples interact with him with more comfort, otherwise it would make a bad impression and considering just few hours of editorial work one can not say that the user is completely devoted to editing his user page and not articles. Look sir, everybody is not of the same type. Everybody has different aspirations and so i was making my account balanced with great userpage as well as great work. But if keeping my userpage empty is what i need to for getting unblocked. Then im ready for it. Also i want to edit pages related football association, rock and roll music, indian laws and astronomy. All in one, please unblock me, i would follow everything you ask me to. Regards Bobby Southside ( talk) 12:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I suggest WP:CIR and WP:IDHT applies here and talk page access should be revoked by the next reviewing admin. -- Yamla ( talk) 13:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
This is a straight forward personal attack on me by him. And no disruptive editing is here. And the WP:CIR never applies here as i am fully aware of english and moreover the message above is a complete witness of that. I have knowledges about syntax too and thats why i had made an infobox well. WP:IDHT too can't be applied here. I haven't disrupted anything. I have just add some unblock request. Now for them, making an unblock request is disruptive because they don't want the user to ever get justice. Moreover, some peoples have broke the wikipedia laws by consistently trying to provoke a new editor by deleting his user page, then blocking him without any warning. Wikipedia policy states that no editor should haunt other users away and also that blocking should be done after negligence to Warning which in my case wasn't even provided. I doubt if the peoples who seem to be on a war against me are the only one who used to edit using that account cuz considering there no. of edits they should have proper knowledge about Wikipedia Policies which the case doesn't seems to be. Bobby Southside ( talk) 13:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Your latest unblock request is almost identical to the previous one. That plus your attack on Yamla have resulted in my revocation of your access to this page.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
-
Checkuser note: This is now a CheckUser block.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
14:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
-